EXPLORE

Article

US Sanctions Grinex Crypto Exchange

Arete Analysis

Cybersecurity Trends

On August 14, 2025, the US Treasury Department announced sanctions against the spiritual successor to Garantex, the Grinex crypto exchange. Following law enforcement action against Garantex in March 2025, Grinex was created by Garantex employees to support sanctions evasion efforts. Subsequently, Grinex has become a hot spot for illicitly obtained funds from ransomware, extortion, and other fraudulent activities.

Multi-Step Process

The disruptions of Grinex and Garantex took years to execute and occurred over multiple phases of sanctions and law enforcement actions.

Phase 1 – Initial Sanctions against Garantex
In April 2022, the US Treasury Department sanctioned Estonia-based crypto exchange Garantex. This came after Estonia revoked Garantex’s license in February 2022 due to a lack of anti-money laundering/know-your-customer (AML/KYC) policies. At the time of the sanctions announcement, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) assessed Garantex to have facilitated more than $100 million USD in illicit transactions. Interestingly, these sanctions did not inhibit Garantex from continuing their operations in providing cover for criminals and sanctioned customers of the exchange.

However, the sanctions did impact the ransomware landscape. Previously used by big-name ransomware groups such as Conti, LockBit, and Ryuk, the exchange was largely no longer a viable option for groups hoping to stay in business and evade additional law enforcement scrutiny. Groups that continued to utilize the sanctioned exchange or decided to use it later often earned themselves a one-way ticket to organizations’ no-pay lists and became a target for future law enforcement takedowns. Notably, 8Base ransomware was added to Arete’s internal no-pay list in September 2023 following an identified transaction to Garantex. 8Base was then taken down by a law enforcement action in February of 2025.

Phase 2 – Law Enforcement Attempts to Dismantle Garantex
Fast-forward to March 2025, when law enforcement agencies led by the US Secret Service attempted to disrupt the sanctioned crypto exchange by seizing Garantex’s primary domain and over $26 million in cryptocurrency assets. Unfortunately, the operation didn’t entirely disrupt the exchange and led to the unveiling of Grinex, often referred to as Garantex 2.0, later that month. Grinex began serving as the nefarious new arm of Garantex, and operators almost immediately began routing illicit funds through the new exchange.

Phase 3 – US Treasury Sanctions Grinex
This brings us to August 14th, when the US Treasury announced sanctions against the newly formed Grinex crypto exchange, three Garantex executives, and the A7A5 stablecoin, which is discussed in the next section. Currently, Grinex remains operational, and Arete is monitoring for use of the exchange as part of ransomware groups money laundering efforts.

But Wait, There’s More

The A7A5 stablecoin cryptocurrency is designed to track 1:1 with the Russian Ruble and appeared to be transferring funds from Garantex in January 2025, indicating the desire to create a sanction-resistant asset even before the disruption. The A7A5 coin, launched behind a veil of shell companies based in Kyrgyzstan, was adopted as an efficient sanctions evasion tool for individuals looking to cash out their illicitly obtained funds.

Analyst Comments

The identification and subsequent sanctions of Grinex and the A7A5 stablecoin significantly impinge upon cybercriminals’ ability to launder funds. Sanctions announcements especially impact ransomware groups, as many incident response firms, especially ones registered as money services businesses (MSBs), will not facilitate payments to groups using sanctioned infrastructure. The unsealing of indictments against the Garantex leadership and increased spotlight on the use of the A7A5 stable coin as a sanctions evasion tool allow organizations additional opportunities to monitor sanctions exposure and prohibit funds from moving to sanctioned entities. Arete cautions that new money laundering techniques designed to evade sanctions are likely to emerge in the future as cybercriminals continuously evolve their tactics in this space.

Sources

Back to Blog Posts

Article

Threat Actors Continue to Leverage BYOVD Technique

Multiple ransomware operations have recently been observed leveraging the Bring Your Own Vulnerable Driver (BYOVD) technique to disable endpoint security controls prior to ransomware deployment. Notably, the Qilin ransomware group commonly leverages a malicious msimg32.dll file loaded via DLL side-loading, along with vulnerable drivers including rwdrv.sys and hlpdrv.sys, to gain kernel-level access and disable security processes. Similarly, Warlock ransomware has been observed exploiting the vulnerable NSecKrnl.sys driver to bypass security controls. The use of BYOVD has also been observed across ransomware campaigns associated with Akira, INC, Medusa, and other threat actors. 

What’s Notable and Unique 

  • The Qilin ransomware group employs a sophisticated multi-stage infection chain, leveraging DLL side-loading (msimg32.dll) to execute malicious payloads directly in memory and evade traditional file-based detection. In DLL side-loading, a threat actor tricks a program into loading a malicious dynamic link library. The malware escalates privileges and uses signed but vulnerable drivers (rwdrv.sys and hlpdrv.sys) to bypass security controls, access system memory, and systematically disable endpoint defenses by terminating security processes and disabling monitoring callbacks at the kernel level. 

  • Akira ransomware operators have also exploited the rwdrv.sys and hlpdrv.sys drivers. Additionally, Arete has observed threat actors leveraging multiple other drivers, including the vulnerable TrueSight.sys, to bypass security controls. 

  • Meanwhile, Warlock ransomware operators disguised malicious activity by renaming rclone.exe to TrendSecurity.exe to appear legitimate. The file functioned as a loader, exploiting the vulnerable NSecKrnl.sys driver to disable security processes, while Group Policy Objects (GPOs) were leveraged to systematically disable security controls across the environment. 

Analyst Comments 

The BYOVD technique, employed by multiple known ransomware operators, reflects a broader shift toward pre-encryption defense evasion, including suppression of Windows telemetry, removal of monitoring callbacks, and abuse of legitimately signed but vulnerable drivers. This technique enables threat actors to evade detection, maintain persistence for extended periods, and maximize the operational impact of ransomware deployment across compromised environments. Organizations should implement strict driver control policies, such as Microsoft’s Vulnerable Driver Blocklist and application control mechanisms. Additionally, enforcing least privilege access, enabling multi-factor authentication (MFA), maintaining up-to-date patching, and continuously monitoring for anomalous driver and kernel-level activity can further reduce the risk of such attacks. 

Sources 

  • Qilin EDR killer infection chain

  • Web Shells, Tunnels, and Ransomware: Dissecting a Warlock Attack 

Article

Ransomware Trends & Data Insights: March 2026

The threat landscape in March had a much more even distribution of threat groups than has been observed since the first half of 2025. Although Akira, Qilin, Play, and INC remained among the most active groups, Arete observed 21 unique ransomware and extortion groups in March, compared to only 15 in February. Akira and Qilin’s activity also declined from the previous month; in February, the two groups were responsible for almost half of all ransomware incidents, but in March they only comprised a little more than a quarter of all activity. Arete also observed activity from several emerging groups in the past month, including BravoX, NightSpire, Payouts King, and Securotrop.

 Figure 1. Activity from the top 5 threat groups in March 2026

Analysts at Arete identified several trends behind the threat actors perpetrating cybercrime activities:

  • In March, threat actors actively exploited FortiGate Next-Generation Firewall appliances as initial access vectors to compromise enterprise networks. The activity involves the exploitation of recently disclosed security vulnerabilities, including CVE-2025-59718, CVE-2025-59719, and CVE-2026-24858, or weak credentials, allowing attackers to gain administrative access, extract configuration files, and obtain service account credentials. Arete also observed Fortinet device exploitation involving various threat groups, with the Qilin ransomware group notably leveraging Fortinet device exploits.


  • Phishing campaigns leveraging OAuth redirection and a resurgence of Microsoft Teams–based social engineering were also observed in March. In one campaign, attackers sent emails disguised as Microsoft Teams recordings or Microsoft 365 alerts, redirecting victims through legitimate OAuth endpoints to attacker-controlled pages hosting malicious ZIP payloads. A separate campaign has been ongoing since last year, in which attackers flood users’ inboxes with spam and impersonate IT support personnel to trick victims into initiating remote support sessions via tools like Quick Assist.


  • Arete recently released its 2025 Annual Crimeware Report. Leveraging data and intelligence collected during ransomware and extortion incident response engagements, this report highlights notable trends and shifts in the threat landscape throughout 2025, including Akira’s unusually high activity levels in the second half of 2025, evolving social engineering techniques, and trends in ransom demands and impacted industries.

Sources

  • Arete Internal

Report

Arete's 2025 Annual Crimeware Report

Harness Arete’s unique data and expertise on extortion and ransomware to inform your response to the evolving threat landscape.

Red alert symbols and warning icons spreading across a digital network, representing firewall compromise and widespread cyber intrusion.
Red alert symbols and warning icons spreading across a digital network, representing firewall compromise and widespread cyber intrusion.

Article

FortiGate Exploits Enable Network Breaches and Credential Theft

A recent security report indicates that threat actors are actively exploiting FortiGate Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW) appliances as initial access vectors to compromise enterprise networks. The activity leverages recently disclosed vulnerabilities or weak credentials to gain unauthorized access and extract configuration files, which often contain sensitive information, including service account credentials and detailed network topology data. 

Analysis of these incidents shows significant variation in attacker dwell time, ranging from immediate lateral movement to delays of up to two months post-compromise. Since these appliances often integrate with authentication systems such as Active Directory and Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP), their compromise can grant attackers extensive access, substantially increasing the risk of widespread network intrusion and data exposure. 

What’s Notable and Unique 

  • The activity involves the exploitation of recently disclosed security vulnerabilities, including CVE-2025-59718, CVE-2025-59719, and CVE-2026-24858, or weak credentials, allowing attackers to gain administrative access, extract configuration files, and obtain service account credentials and network topology information. 


  • In one observed incident, attackers created a FortiGate admin account with unrestricted firewall rules and maintained access over time, consistent with initial access broker activity. After a couple of months, threat actors extracted and decrypted LDAP credentials to compromise Active Directory. 

  • In another case, attackers moved from FortiGate access to deploying remote access tools, including Pulseway and MeshAgent, while also utilizing cloud infrastructure such as Google Cloud Storage and Amazon Web Services (AWS). 

Analyst Comments 

Arete has identified multiple instances of Fortinet device exploitation for initial access, involving various threat actors, with the Qilin ransomware group notably leveraging Fortinet device exploits. Given their integration with systems like Active Directory, NGFW appliances remain high-value targets for both state-aligned and financially motivated actors. In parallel, Arete has observed recent dark web activity involving leaked FortiGate VPN access, further highlighting the expanding risk landscape. This aligns with the recent reporting from Amazon Threat Intelligence, which identified large-scale compromises of FortiGate devices driven by exposed management ports and weak authentication, rather than vulnerability exploitation. Overall, these developments underscore the increasing focus on network edge devices as entry points, reinforcing the need for organizations to strengthen authentication, restrict external exposure, and address fundamental security gaps to mitigate the risk of widespread compromise. 

Sources 

FortiGate Edge Intrusions | Stolen Service Accounts Lead to Rogue Workstations and Deep AD Compromise