EXPLORE

Article

Don’t Drink from That! Gootloader Watering Hole Leads to REvil Attack

Arete Analysis

Threat Actors

REvil, more commonly referred to as Sodinokibi, is one of the most prolific ransomware threat groups currently active in the cyber extortion space. In the past year alone, Arete has responded to countless incidents where REvil has facilitated cyberattacks against client sites.

From our investigations, we have curated and documented threat intelligence to better understand the group’s tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs). Based on incident analysis, the threat group primarily leverages three main vectors to gain initial access to targeted environments:

  • They exploit externally facing and unsecured Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP).

  • They leverage access to a compromised remote management platform, such as ScreenConnect/ConnectWise or NinjaRMM.

  • Or, they leverage compromised VPN appliances.

Other entry and deployment methodologies have been employed previously by the REvil group, such as the WinRAR Italia distributor supply chain attack in June of 2019. However, based off of the numerous REvil attacks we have responded to since the group’s inception, the above methodologies are those most commonly leveraged by the REvil threat group.

During a recent incident, however, we noted an interesting change in the group’s initial  access tactics, whereby they leveraged a successful Cobalt Strike compromise, which was initially introduced into the victim environment by way of the execution of Gootloader that was downloaded from a fraudulent messaging forum.

Arete Analysis

During our investigation, we identified the root cause of this incident as a successful watering hole attack that had impacted an employee workstation.

While conducting an online search for legal contract agreements specific to septic systems, the employee selected a site that a Google search had returned. Unbeknownst to the employee, threat actors had compromised the site, configuring it to display a malicious web page designed to look like an active messaging forum.

As shown below, the forum’s first post appeared to come from a user — display name “Emma Hill” — who had requested the same type of legal contract agreement that the employee had been searching for. The web page also made it seem that another user — display name “Admin” — had replied to the initial post, providing a direct download link to the requested document.


Figure 1: Malicious web page that appears to show a legitimate messaging forum

In this case, the hyperlinked text reached out to an external domain, one that was hosting a PHP script named down.php. When clicked, this link fetched a request to this PHP script, which then automatically downloaded a ZIP archive that contained a highly obfuscated JavaScript file. This JavaScript file had the same name as the ZIP archive. The content of this JavaScript file is below:

Figure 2: JavaScript file

Based on our analysis and the fact that we observed Cobalt Strike indicators on the endpoint less than an hour later, this JavaScript file was attributed to the Gootkit Remote Access Trojan (RAT), which was then further leveraged to introduce a secondary payload, Cobalt Strike, into the victim environment.  A REvil threat actor leveraged this initial compromise to gain access into this organization’s environment and, approximately eight (8) days later, deployed the REvil ransomware.

Another interesting observation from the analysis of this web page was that, after visiting the site from the same IP address in a short amount of time, the page redirected the end user to a different web page, one with a title page indicative of the legal contract the user was searching for. Unfortunately, this web page was simply a veil designed to shroud the site’s compromise and suppress any user suspicions.

Figure 3: Web page after initial site visitation

Indicators

Based on analysis performed during this engagement, Arete has compiled a list of indicators for public use and incorporation into security infrastructure.

Zip Archive Containing JavaScript Payload

  • MD5: E435D74D8A4009C955635C11DA1D3AFC

  • SHA1: F7C620AD560CDA2A9BA90B3E17C6D43A5FB91B44

  • SHA256: 2D6AB5C855F86032C4B2213B7FC5E53F0A772B4F709AE85299B8D33C1867845C

JavaScript Payload

  • MD5: 31C8B072C6FF386645DB60A4D9E121BB

  • SHA1: F6D85FFE4CA1A77F0DF7FE2379D6BB2103B6EE15

  • SHA256: 71C838EAC60AFBFE39728887240781AA5A10E0E563FB4AC259F965BFCD1FD5EA

Domains Serving Zip Archive

  • https[:]//www[.]vacanzenelmediterraneo[.]com/down.php

    • IPv4: 89.46.108[.]30

  • https[:]//www[.]thursdaybram[.]com/down.php

    • IPv4: 104.131.158[.]83

  • https[:]//yukata-sienne[.]jp/down.php

    • IPv4: 183.181.97[.]13

  • https[:]//www[.]frerecapucinbenin[.]org/down.php

    • IPv4: 94.177.165[.]14

  • https[:]//www[.]willkommen[.]org[.]rs/down.php

    • IPv4: 46.151.128[.]3

Watering Hole Communication Strings

  • Hi, I am looking to*A friend of mine told me he had seen it on your forum. I will appreciate any help here.

  • Here is a direct download link,

  • Thank you so much for your response! This is exactly what Ive been looking for

  • Thank you, Admin

  • Issue resolved. The ticket can be closed.

Fraudulent Forum – Full

Back to Blog Posts

Article

Top 9 Security Controls for SMBs

In today’s complex cyber threat landscape, small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) should implement a layered, multi-pronged approach to security. Here are some proven, effective controls to consider:

1.        Implement MFA for All Users
Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is an effective and accessible way to protect sensitive data, comply with regulatory standards, and prevent unauthorized access to critical systems. By ensuring that users not only use a password but also a secure token, an organization can significantly reduce phishing attempts, credential stuffing attacks, and ransomware incidents. MFA should be enabled for email, VPN, and critical system access.

2.        Update Patch Management Programs
A modern patching program should include policies and mechanisms to manage software updates in a timely manner. Patching efforts should address not just operating system updates, but also commonly utilized software within the environment. An active patching plan aims to reduce the mean time to patch and provide metrics on existing patch efforts. In the event of a high-severity vulnerability, a mature patching program should also be able to identify the risks and exposure for a given set of systems based on the average time to patch. This helps stakeholders make informed decisions when a new exploit is released.

3.        Leverage a Properly Managed Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Tool
With real-time threat detection and advanced visibility, endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions can enhance an organization’s ability to detect and investigate potential malicious activity, including ransomware, lateral movement, fileless attacks, and more. Effective management of EDR should include proper configuration, regular agent updates, and established procedures for responding to alerts.

4.        Enhance EDR with Frontline Incident Intelligence
While EDR solutions are an important component of a security program, threat actors are continually adapting their techniques to evade detection, and as a result, standard detection methods may not always identify emerging threats or novel attack behaviors. To strengthen protection, organizations can supplement EDR tools with custom detection rules informed by incident response data. These rules can help identify indicators of compromise observed during cyber incidents, providing an additional layer of visibility beyond traditional detections.

Arete Bloktd℠ illustrates this approach by transforming threat intelligence and malware analysis into curated detection rules for EDR tools. Applying frontline intelligence to security tools can result in earlier detection, less investigative burden, and a more confident response. 

5.        Create and Continuously Test an Incident Response (IR) Plan
An incident response plan can help an organization effectively identify, respond to, and recover from a cybersecurity incident while minimizing disruption and downtime. An IR plan defines clear roles, escalation paths, communication strategies, and decision frameworks for both internal and external teams. To be effective, these plans should be regularly tested with post-incident reviews or tabletop exercises involving key stakeholders.

6.        Maintain Encrypted and Tested Data Backups
In the case of a cyberattack, backups can help organizations maintain business continuity, support ransom negotiations with threat actors, and contribute to a timely and successful recovery. Encrypting backups makes it more difficult for threat actors to access or alter them, and regular testing ensures they remain accessible during a security incident.

7.        Conduct Employee Security Awareness Training
Human error is a leading cause of cybersecurity incidents, and an organization’s employees are its first line of defense against cyber threats. Security awareness training reinforces the importance of data confidentiality, supports regulatory compliance, and helps employees recognize and understand red flags such as suspicious emails, malicious links, and social engineering attempts.

8.        Assess and Address Existing Risk and Vulnerabilities
To maintain a proactive approach to risk management and improve resilience, organizations should regularly assess existing vulnerabilities through expert-led Vulnerability Assessments, Penetration Testing, and Threat Hunting Assessments. These exercises can help identify security gaps, support regulatory compliance, and prevent potential incidents. During remediation, prioritize high-impact vulnerabilities and make a plan for periodic assessments.

9.        Apply Least-Privilege Access Controls
Employees should have access only to the systems, applications, and data necessary to perform their jobs. By removing unnecessary administrative privileges and regularly reviewing user permissions, organizations can reduce the risk of unauthorized access and limit the damage caused by compromised accounts or insider threats.

Organizations should regularly review their cybersecurity programs, stay informed about emerging threats, and evaluate whether their security controls are adapting to the evolving threat landscape.

Article

Ransomware Trends & Data Insights: August 2026

Although INC Ransom was the most active ransomware threat group observed in August 2026, overall activity remained relatively distributed across the threat landscape, with approximately 30 unique ransomware and extortion groups, including both established and newly emerged actors, observed during the month. Alongside INC Ransom, Storm, DragonForce, Qilin, and The Gentlemen were among the top five most active threat groups, underscoring the continued diversity and competitiveness of the ransomware ecosystem.

Figure 1. Activity from the top 5 threat groups in August 2026 

Throughout the month, analysts at Arete identified several trends behind the threat actors perpetrating cybercrime activities: 

  • August 2026 was a significant month for the emergence of new threat actors, with Arete identifying several previously untracked ransomware groups, including Storm, Dark Project, DireWolf, Morpheus, Orova, Spirals, Wallstreet Team, and Zawoo Team. This trend underscores the ongoing evolution of the threat landscape and the low barriers to entry for new cybercriminal operations. 

  • Arete observed a continued use of AI-enabled capabilities across the ransomware ecosystem during August. Similar to Fulcrumsec and Setra, the newly emerged Zawoo Team appears to leverage AI-assisted analysis of stolen data, publishing highly structured and detailed victim assessments on its data leak site (DLS). Additionally, both the Aurora and Storm ransomware groups have been observed utilizing AI-driven or AI-assisted chat representatives during victim communications. These developments suggest that threat actors are increasingly incorporating AI to enhance data analysis, automate victim engagement, and improve the effectiveness and scalability of extortion operations. 

  • In August, Arete also observed that despite sustained law enforcement disruption efforts, LockBit continues to demonstrate operational resilience, likely through the expansion of its affiliate ecosystem and the evolution of its tactics. Recent activity indicates an increased reliance on data theft and exfiltration-only operations, with observed victimology suggesting a notable focus on organizations within the financial sector. 

Sources

  • Arete Internal

Report

Arete's H1 2026 Crimeware Report

Explore intelligence and operational data from the frontlines of ransomware and extortion response as we detail the most significant trends and developments in the cyber threat landscape in the first half (H1) of 2026.

Article

WinRAR Path-Traversal Vulnerability Exploited in Ransomware Attacks

CISA has warned that CVE-2025-8088, a path-traversal vulnerability in WinRAR, is being exploited in ransomware attacks. The vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted archive files to place malicious executables in locations such as the Windows Startup folder, enabling code execution when the system restarts. WinRAR addressed this vulnerability in version 7.13, but exploitation has continued due to challenges in updating the software. CISA's updated KEV entry now specifically identifies the vulnerability as being used in ransomware attacks. 

What’s Notable and Unique

  • The vulnerability was initially exploited as a zero-day by the Russia-linked RomCom group, enabling malware execution at user logon and supporting credential theft, cyberespionage, and ransomware-related activities.

  • CVE-2025-8088 continues to be actively exploited by both government-backed and financially motivated threat actors. Observed campaigns have been attributed to Russian- and Chinese-linked groups targeting several organizations.

  • Phishing campaigns leveraging weaponized RAR attachments exploited CVE-2025-8088 to silently place malicious payloads in autorun locations using directory traversal and Alternate Data Streams (ADS). 

  • The widespread exploitation of CVE-2025-8088 highlights strong demand for effective WinRAR exploits, with multiple underground vendors previously supplying exploit capabilities to a diverse range of threat actors. One such vendor, zeroplayer, advertised a WinRAR exploit in July 2025. 

Analyst Comments

Organizations should immediately upgrade WinRAR to version 7.13 or later and conduct an enterprise-wide inventory to identify unmanaged installations. Given that WinRAR lacks automatic updates, Group Policy support, and integration with common enterprise patch management platforms, manual verification and remediation may be required to ensure all vulnerable instances are addressed. Security teams should also enhance defenses against archive-based phishing attacks by blocking or scrutinizing unsolicited compressed files, monitoring for suspicious file creation in Windows Startup directories, and detecting abuse of ADS. With CISA now linking CVE-2025-8088 to ransomware activity, organizations should treat remediation as a high priority and actively monitor for indicators of WinRAR-based exploitation across their environments.

Sources

  • CISA Adds Three Known Exploited Vulnerabilities to Catalog

  • WinRAR vulnerability being exploited in ransomware attacks, CISA warns