EXPLORE

Article

Egregor: The Ghost of Soviet Bears Past Haunts On

Arete Analysis

Combating Ransomware

Threat Actors

Summary

Egregor ransomware, a sophisticated RaaS platform, uses data exfiltration and brazen negotiation tactics to target major sectors like manufacturing and retail and caters to experienced affiliates.

Ransomware variants come. Ransomware variants go. And while Egregor may have only recently surfaced, it is by no means a fly-by-night operation. In fact, one could argue that the foundation upon which Egregor operates has been around since Stalin and Beria’s secret police, and it is been lurking, watching, waiting for the right time to strike.  
 
As a mature and exclusive Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) platform, Egregor poses a serious threat to both public and private organizations. Not only is it supported by seasoned cybercriminal software developers, but it also caters to experienced affiliates who effectively target and compromise organizations, executing enterprise-wide deployment to maximize the monetization of their efforts.  

In particular, Egregor plagues the manufacturing and retail sectors, with recent targets including well-known brands like Kmart, TransLink, Embraer, Randstad, Barnes & Noble, and Ubisoft. While the ransomware impacted more than 100 organizations across France, Italy, Germany, the U.K., Asia-Pacific, the Middle East, and Latin America in the final quarter of 2020, U.S. organizations remained top targets, accounting for roughly 50 percent of attacks in that timeframe.  
 
Given the observed consistency of broad, opportunistic targeting, an attack is more a matter of when for organizations that remain unprepared.

Statistical data on Egregor ransomware from Arete metrics  

The information listed below is based on Egregor cases investigated by Arete IR since October 2020.  Our IR and Data Analytics practices work together to track key data points for every ransomware engagement.  Our IR practice tracks data points on the ransomware variant and collects statistics based on handled engagements:

Sectors of clients affected by this threat:  
 Healthcare | Finance | Professional Services | Manufacturing | Public Service 

  • Malware precursor: Qbot and IcedID  

  • Average ransom demand: $3,407,119  

  • Highest ransom paid: $1,000,000  

  • Lowest ransom paid: $100,000  

  • Average business downtime: 12 days  

  • Data exfiltration has been observed in 99 percent of the cases. In one outlier case, where there was no data exfiltration, Arete assisted the client with data restoration.

From whence the brazen Egregor came

Egregor is a label inspired by the occult, signifying the collective “energy” or “force” of a group of individuals — perhaps befitting an affiliate-serving RaaS platform. It was first publicly identified as early as September 2020, closely following the alleged cessation of Maze ransomware operations the month prior. Both ransomware platforms evolved from the Sehkmet ransomware family, and code analysis of each has provided high-confidence indications that Egregor ransomware is most likely a successor to Maze, whose developers and operators have not ceased operations but merely “re-branded.”  
 
Egregor developers and operator affiliates are likely Russian and/or Eastern European cybercriminals. Security researchers have noted observations of deployment script comments in Russian, and Egregor performs language checks in similar sequence and fashion to its predecessor Maze; it will not execute on systems with a regional designator for Russia or Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) signatories.  
 
The affiliates operating Egregor are also infamous for their brazen intimidation — for example, allegedly printing ransom demands from victim network printers — and hardline negotiating, executing on the ultimatum that they will leak victim data within 72 hours if they do not receive a response following the encryption of victims’ systems. In many cases, they will leak the entirety of the data they exfiltrate.

Egregor high-level technical overview

While tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) may vary amongst operators, it’s important to note that Egregor caters to semi-exclusive affiliates, likely of Russian or Eastern European origin.

The broader research community has observed consistent commonalities between Egregor and ProLock intrusion cycles. Given their similarities in TTPs, supported by multiple open-source confirmations of our own observations, we assess with high confidence that Qakbot operators have likely transitioned from ProLock to Egregor.

Egregor operators are known to exploit vulnerable and internet-accessible RDP gateways and phish victims with targeted, convincing lures. They also commonly deploy Egregor through Qakbot (Qbot), Ursnif (Gozi/ISFB), IcedID (Bakbot) infostealer/loader hybrid Trojan malware. Cobalt Strike has also been used to deliver Egregor in select instances.

The Egregor payload was likely designed to be portable, serving various affiliate tools, and is commonly encountered as a PE in dynamic linked library (DLL) form. Open-source Intelligence (OSINT) indicates that the DLL contains code and data, natively supporting multiple bot loader functions. The payload will not be decrypted and loaded without the proper key phrase provided to the DLL in the command line.

Egregor operators perform several evasive maneuvers during to the intrusion cycle, including disabling antivirus and endpoint protection (e.g., Windows Defender) via automated scripts (e.g., PowerShell+WMI) executed under elevated privileges.

OSINT reporting reveals that operators have uploaded batch files to victim system that, when executed, will take advantage of the BITSAdmin (bitsadmin.exe) utility to download the ransomware from a remote server and automatically execute it in the system.

The malware supports the following command-line arguments:

–fast: targets files within a size-limit range for encryption

–full: full encryption of the host (including mapped/mounted network drives)

–multiproc: multi-threading for speed

–nomimikatz: switch off Mimikatz module; Mimikatz is an open-source OST credential-harvesting tool

–nonet: do not encrypt network drives

–path: encrypt only specified folder(s)

–target: encrypt file(s) that have a specific extension

–append: select file extension to append to encrypted files

–norename: do not rename encrypted files

–greetings: prepend a name to the ransom note, likely used for directly addressing victims

–samba: establish file-, printer-, and serial port-sharing between compromised nodes

–killrdp: terminate RDP session

During breach response investigations, Arete has observed the following artifacts associated with the ransomware execution:

  • exe C:%USERNAME%Downloadsclang.dll,DllRegisterServer -pigbutt5 –multiproc

  • exe \Domain_ControllerIntelmsvc.dll,DllRegisterServer -passegr17 –multiproc

  • exe C:Windowsmsvc.dll,DllRegisterServer -passegr13 –full

  • exe C:Windowsdog.dll,DllRegisterServer -pclassified13 –full

  • exe \Domain_Controllerintelfasm.dll,DllRegisterServer -pbiden17 –multiproc

  • C:Windowssystem32cmd.exe /c eb2.bat -passegr13

  • C:Windowssystem32cmd.exe /c eb.bat -pclassified13

  • The last two artifacts show the threat actor using a batch file to pass the key phrase and properly execute the ransomware with the “–full” option.

The following tools have also been found to be associated with the threat actor activity:

  • Advanced Port Scanner: A network scanner that enumerates networked hosts and open ports.

  • ADFind: A tool that is used to enumerate Active Directory.

  • Lazange: A password recovery tool to harvest credentials.

  • PsExec: A lightweight tool that lets you execute processes on other systems, complete with full interactivity for console applications, without having to manually install client software.

Security recommendations

  1. Implement a sophisticated endpoint detection and response (EDR) solution that will rely on behavior analysis, instead of just malware signatures, and have tamper-proof capabilities.

  2. Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA).

  3. Implement an email security solution to detect and protect against known and unknown threats.

  4. Lock down and tighten privileges around Microsoft PowerShell in your environment. Apply and enforce PowerShell Constrained Language Mode (CLM) throughout your environments. Consider Just Enough Administration (JEA) policies to allow select PowerShell host administrative capabilities while disabling others.

  5. Hunt for unusual RDP connections.

  6. Prevent users from executing any program or any of the 31 currently known Windows executable filetypes (e.g., .exe, .dll, .hta, .bat, .scr) from the AppDataLocalTemp path of Office365, Microsoft Word, Excel, and Outlook. Alternatively, also inspect C: C:Users[current user]AppDataRoamingMicrosoft as it’s another popular method that achieves the same results.

  7. Develop and implement a user security education program to assist with identifying threats like those in phishing emails.

  8. Implement an off-site backup solution and test it regularly.

Summary of indicators from OSINT and Arete investigations

Egregor filenames 

clang.dll

fasm.dll

sed.dll

q.dll

dog.dll

msvc.dll

b.dll



Key phrases to decrypt and execute the ransomware 

-passgregor10

-passgregor1313

-pass2police

-peguard6

-pclassified13

-passengr13

-passgregor9999

-pbiden17

-passengr17

-websitecounterficker

Note: ‘dubisteinmutterficker’ is a German profanity: You’re a motherf*****


Bitcoin [BTC] wallet addresses 

1MPdDiRhWFawgN2GVi1Jamm8DdC4qypoGL

112yZpAs3Va6az6JTKZ7iQZEAWdvD5DYoj

1Mk96FcixjayGZgdPgo4GrnPPSn7rL1jpE

1D2ZiHwE4pQb8X6NncXdfHwncHa3yrDdYr

13ELQVGgkM79nW34ncBe7Jz7xhXsXmrRuM

1PDSGRqkBF7yEjHTNDaxNm6UQT63rrzTGk

1LdrbQEaersWLi6A83JrCzERyXEZWD4hBP

1GJ4dp5wwK2E9P74eF7FVujjTHERDTFJX

1GZV41rSAHAj63pNjLCBwo7rfioxU8JPE9



URLs hosting Egregor

hxxp://185.238.0[.]241:81/78.bin

hxxp://49.12.104[.]241:81/sm.dll

hxxp://49.12.104[.]241/sm.dll

hxxp://49.12.104[.]241:81/78.bin


Egregor SHA256 hashes

5cb7a352535b447609849e20aec18c84d8b58e377d9c6365eafb45cdb7ef949b 14e547bebaa738b8605ba4182c4379317d121e268f846c0ed3da171375e65fe4 4139c96d16875d1c3d12c27086775437b26d3c0ebdcdc258fb012d23b9ef8345 38b155b6546db882189cc79bcac0b0284d3f858e0feb1e5dbc24b22f78cdfb68 f1ba626b8181bd1cd84f47f70838d9fa4d8117fac3bd07cbd73cb6f73b1297f8 b9b71eb04d255b21e3272eef5f4c15d1c208183748dfad3569efd455d87879c6 6dbe1d2de299359036520f15490834a6ac40b665cf5cd249379d65242af00b44 3b13b6f1d7cd14dc4a097a12e2e505c0a4cff495262261e2bfc991df238b9b04 28f3f5a3ea270d9b896fe38b9df79a6ca430f5edab0423b3d834cf8d586f13e6 7222c8acc69a7598989c335d528b366f801a41b434cbf928c6aef01f8e54f57a a9d483c0f021b72a94324562068d8164f8cce0aa8f779faea304669390775436 14da004cc96b910fb75abb86df09e318d92f4fb8dda39c8bd6a8e0601b6605d8 004a2dc3ec7b98fa7fe6ae9c23a8b051ec30bcfcd2bc387c440c07ff5180fe9a 311baa4d4229a8d6802d82a8d9935592bf9a7b6aaf0949f0fa0b094592f5e8a7 ee06c557f1acd5c4948b1df0413e49f3885f8ac96185a9d986b91a1231444541 2d563dd113a02fdf452544ae2fd7c94162be6db8fb7a287a3474a6ab998159fd 2d01c32d51e4bbb986255e402da4624a61b8ae960532fbb7bb0d3b0080cb9946 9017c070ad6ac9ac52e361286b3ff24a315f721f488b53b7aaf6ac35de477f44 af538ab1b8bdfbf5b7f1548d72c0d042eb14d0011d796cab266f0671720abb4d aee131ba1bfc4b6fa1961a7336e43d667086ebd2c7ff81029e14b2bf47d9f3a7 e6b9d0d356223ed81e635c5702dd47bca1aaeae3471827db03470713e453d5b4 3fc382ae51ceca3ad6ef5880cdd2d89ef508f368911d3cd41c71a54453004c55 319ec80eae65c1d39df27c80b52fe7fe1fadc6e9ceabf72f57d1b29e0467ac02 932778732711cd18d5c4aabc507a65180bf1d4bd2b7d2d4e5506be4b8193596e 3e5a6834cf6192a987ca9b0b4c8cb9202660e399ebe387af8c7407b12ae2da63 3fd510a3b2e0b0802d57cd5b1cac1e61797d50a08b87d9b5243becd9e2f7073f 765327e1dc0888c69c92203d90037c5154db9787f54d3fc8f1097830be8c76ab b027467332243c8186e59f68ff7c43c9e212d9e5074fedf003febcfedad4381a 4c9e3ffda0e663217638e6192a093bbc23cd9ebfbdf6d2fc683f331beaee0321 42ac07c5175d88d6528cfe3dceacd01834323f10c4af98b1a190d5af7a7bb1cb e53ab9a892321f651b73c8468db43b1d82c8c9d7fb8d0131199f501c6a0bafa7 1399e4b4ec1c7f3e38048d526f85472c466421dcd00ecd4515605af191ac61ee 6675c204844476dd8ce59ead0eac082754ded599036551526a8e2c509a1407e4 605c2047be7c4a17823ad1fa5c1f94fd105721fce3621dc9148cd3baf352938e 7fe8d3e63bad6a1628376643a4fe43b9858af5426da808576900b7753bce7614 34c84f171cd6c627d116f9c571b35e11541d68abfce36c852d2d787149f44672 7caed5f406445c788543f55af6d98a8bc4f0c104e6a51e2564dd37b6a485cc18 6a441734b34cdee31a01164140b0c88966fbb4358dcb63a14ae6824f09e9476f 81afd15e8c4d3ae0e34ede646551fe2ed6872d2142f642835cbbbf7dc524131b df5d9251afabd579f85de2f4d0c90150693fa73631317a39d08749d366bf37fd 9c900078cc6061fb7ba038ee5c065a45112665f214361d433fc3906bf288e0eb 967422de1acc14deb7e7ce803d86aff44e2652bfcd550e3a34c2e37abc883dee a7940b9e8ad2a54368999366fe2c50f429008dfb0817000693077e1d1f107d6e c1c4e677b36a2ee6ae858546e727e73cc38c95c9024c724f939178b3c03de906 a5989c480ec6506247325652a1f3cb415934675de3877270ae0f65edd9b14d13 a376fd507afe8a1b5d377d18436e5701702109ac9d3e7026d19b65a7d313b332

Back to Blog Posts

Article

Top 9 Security Controls for SMBs

In today’s complex cyber threat landscape, small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) should implement a layered, multi-pronged approach to security. Here are some proven, effective controls to consider:

1.        Implement MFA for All Users
Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is an effective and accessible way to protect sensitive data, comply with regulatory standards, and prevent unauthorized access to critical systems. By ensuring that users not only use a password but also a secure token, an organization can significantly reduce phishing attempts, credential stuffing attacks, and ransomware incidents. MFA should be enabled for email, VPN, and critical system access.

2.        Update Patch Management Programs
A modern patching program should include policies and mechanisms to manage software updates in a timely manner. Patching efforts should address not just operating system updates, but also commonly utilized software within the environment. An active patching plan aims to reduce the mean time to patch and provide metrics on existing patch efforts. In the event of a high-severity vulnerability, a mature patching program should also be able to identify the risks and exposure for a given set of systems based on the average time to patch. This helps stakeholders make informed decisions when a new exploit is released.

3.        Leverage a Properly Managed Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Tool
With real-time threat detection and advanced visibility, endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions can enhance an organization’s ability to detect and investigate potential malicious activity, including ransomware, lateral movement, fileless attacks, and more. Effective management of EDR should include proper configuration, regular agent updates, and established procedures for responding to alerts.

4.        Enhance EDR with Frontline Incident Intelligence
While EDR solutions are an important component of a security program, threat actors are continually adapting their techniques to evade detection, and as a result, standard detection methods may not always identify emerging threats or novel attack behaviors. To strengthen protection, organizations can supplement EDR tools with custom detection rules informed by incident response data. These rules can help identify indicators of compromise observed during cyber incidents, providing an additional layer of visibility beyond traditional detections.

Arete Bloktd℠ illustrates this approach by transforming threat intelligence and malware analysis into curated detection rules for EDR tools. Applying frontline intelligence to security tools can result in earlier detection, less investigative burden, and a more confident response. 

5.        Create and Continuously Test an Incident Response (IR) Plan
An incident response plan can help an organization effectively identify, respond to, and recover from a cybersecurity incident while minimizing disruption and downtime. An IR plan defines clear roles, escalation paths, communication strategies, and decision frameworks for both internal and external teams. To be effective, these plans should be regularly tested with post-incident reviews or tabletop exercises involving key stakeholders.

6.        Maintain Encrypted and Tested Data Backups
In the case of a cyberattack, backups can help organizations maintain business continuity, support ransom negotiations with threat actors, and contribute to a timely and successful recovery. Encrypting backups makes it more difficult for threat actors to access or alter them, and regular testing ensures they remain accessible during a security incident.

7.        Conduct Employee Security Awareness Training
Human error is a leading cause of cybersecurity incidents, and an organization’s employees are its first line of defense against cyber threats. Security awareness training reinforces the importance of data confidentiality, supports regulatory compliance, and helps employees recognize and understand red flags such as suspicious emails, malicious links, and social engineering attempts.

8.        Assess and Address Existing Risk and Vulnerabilities
To maintain a proactive approach to risk management and improve resilience, organizations should regularly assess existing vulnerabilities through expert-led Vulnerability Assessments, Penetration Testing, and Threat Hunting Assessments. These exercises can help identify security gaps, support regulatory compliance, and prevent potential incidents. During remediation, prioritize high-impact vulnerabilities and make a plan for periodic assessments.

9.        Apply Least-Privilege Access Controls
Employees should have access only to the systems, applications, and data necessary to perform their jobs. By removing unnecessary administrative privileges and regularly reviewing user permissions, organizations can reduce the risk of unauthorized access and limit the damage caused by compromised accounts or insider threats.

Organizations should regularly review their cybersecurity programs, stay informed about emerging threats, and evaluate whether their security controls are adapting to the evolving threat landscape.

Article

Ransomware Trends & Data Insights: August 2026

Although INC Ransom was the most active ransomware threat group observed in August 2026, overall activity remained relatively distributed across the threat landscape, with approximately 30 unique ransomware and extortion groups, including both established and newly emerged actors, observed during the month. Alongside INC Ransom, Storm, DragonForce, Qilin, and The Gentlemen were among the top five most active threat groups, underscoring the continued diversity and competitiveness of the ransomware ecosystem.

Figure 1. Activity from the top 5 threat groups in August 2026 

Throughout the month, analysts at Arete identified several trends behind the threat actors perpetrating cybercrime activities: 

  • August 2026 was a significant month for the emergence of new threat actors, with Arete identifying several previously untracked ransomware groups, including Storm, Dark Project, DireWolf, Morpheus, Orova, Spirals, Wallstreet Team, and Zawoo Team. This trend underscores the ongoing evolution of the threat landscape and the low barriers to entry for new cybercriminal operations. 

  • Arete observed a continued use of AI-enabled capabilities across the ransomware ecosystem during August. Similar to Fulcrumsec and Setra, the newly emerged Zawoo Team appears to leverage AI-assisted analysis of stolen data, publishing highly structured and detailed victim assessments on its data leak site (DLS). Additionally, both the Aurora and Storm ransomware groups have been observed utilizing AI-driven or AI-assisted chat representatives during victim communications. These developments suggest that threat actors are increasingly incorporating AI to enhance data analysis, automate victim engagement, and improve the effectiveness and scalability of extortion operations. 

  • In August, Arete also observed that despite sustained law enforcement disruption efforts, LockBit continues to demonstrate operational resilience, likely through the expansion of its affiliate ecosystem and the evolution of its tactics. Recent activity indicates an increased reliance on data theft and exfiltration-only operations, with observed victimology suggesting a notable focus on organizations within the financial sector. 

Sources

  • Arete Internal

Report

Arete's H1 2026 Crimeware Report

Explore intelligence and operational data from the frontlines of ransomware and extortion response as we detail the most significant trends and developments in the cyber threat landscape in the first half (H1) of 2026.

Article

WinRAR Path-Traversal Vulnerability Exploited in Ransomware Attacks

CISA has warned that CVE-2025-8088, a path-traversal vulnerability in WinRAR, is being exploited in ransomware attacks. The vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted archive files to place malicious executables in locations such as the Windows Startup folder, enabling code execution when the system restarts. WinRAR addressed this vulnerability in version 7.13, but exploitation has continued due to challenges in updating the software. CISA's updated KEV entry now specifically identifies the vulnerability as being used in ransomware attacks. 

What’s Notable and Unique

  • The vulnerability was initially exploited as a zero-day by the Russia-linked RomCom group, enabling malware execution at user logon and supporting credential theft, cyberespionage, and ransomware-related activities.

  • CVE-2025-8088 continues to be actively exploited by both government-backed and financially motivated threat actors. Observed campaigns have been attributed to Russian- and Chinese-linked groups targeting several organizations.

  • Phishing campaigns leveraging weaponized RAR attachments exploited CVE-2025-8088 to silently place malicious payloads in autorun locations using directory traversal and Alternate Data Streams (ADS). 

  • The widespread exploitation of CVE-2025-8088 highlights strong demand for effective WinRAR exploits, with multiple underground vendors previously supplying exploit capabilities to a diverse range of threat actors. One such vendor, zeroplayer, advertised a WinRAR exploit in July 2025. 

Analyst Comments

Organizations should immediately upgrade WinRAR to version 7.13 or later and conduct an enterprise-wide inventory to identify unmanaged installations. Given that WinRAR lacks automatic updates, Group Policy support, and integration with common enterprise patch management platforms, manual verification and remediation may be required to ensure all vulnerable instances are addressed. Security teams should also enhance defenses against archive-based phishing attacks by blocking or scrutinizing unsolicited compressed files, monitoring for suspicious file creation in Windows Startup directories, and detecting abuse of ADS. With CISA now linking CVE-2025-8088 to ransomware activity, organizations should treat remediation as a high priority and actively monitor for indicators of WinRAR-based exploitation across their environments.

Sources

  • CISA Adds Three Known Exploited Vulnerabilities to Catalog

  • WinRAR vulnerability being exploited in ransomware attacks, CISA warns