Article
Fool Us Once … BlackMatter Initial Access Tactics Point to a Possible REvil Association
Arete Analysis
Cyber Threats
Threat Actors

By Kevin Baker
Arete observed an overlap between a recent BlackMatter case and a Q1 2021 REvil case. In both instances, the actors leveraged the NodeJS-based Gootloader to deliver a CobaltStrike payload.
In a March 2021 insight, Arete detailed findings related to complex watering-hole infrastructure used to deliver Gootloader to unsuspecting victims. Highlights included:
REvil actors leveraged compromised web servers of legitimate businesses to host Gootloader.
Actors leveraged search engine optimization (SEO) hijacking to push malicious results to the top.
The malicious search results led to an actor-controlled site masquerading as a legitimate messaging board.
The board contained fake posts by different users, including an “admin” account (Figure 1).
The download link in Figure 1 led to a JS-payload that installed a CobaltStrike (CS) beacon.
The actor leveraged CS to move laterally within the victim’s network to deploy and execute the REvil ransomware.

Figure 1 – Actor-controlled forum and fake posts (Source: Arete Forensics Insight)
While watering-hole attacks have been around for years, Arete did not previously observe this specific watering-hole site configuration in the wild or associated with ransomware threat group activity until this specific REvil investigation and response in Q1 2021. Fast forward a few months and REvil is no longer operational and their infrastructure (e.g., communication site, storage sites) is offline. The cause of the REvil’s disappearance is unknown, but the group’s tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) live on with another group: BlackMatter.
In August 2021, Arete was engaged to investigate and respond to a BlackMatter ransomware attack that impacted a law practice in the Midwest United States. Forensic timeline analysis of the observed indicators of compromise (IoCs) led Arete to assess that while the BlackMatter ransomware payload was detonated in August 2021, the initial compromise originally occurred in May 2021 and was attributed to the same type of Gootloader JS payload that impacted the professional services organization we assisted in Q1 2021.
Analysis indicated that in early May 2021, an employee of the victim organization searched in Google for “intercompany agreement transfer pricing sample.” As was the case with the Q1 2021 REvil incident, the actors leveraged SEO hijacking to prioritize the Gootloader infected pages. Arete observed that several keywords were altered to reflect the employee’s search terms (Figure 2).

Figure 2 – Gootloader watering hole leads to BlackMatter ransomware deployment.
When compared side by side with the Gootloader watering hole REvil leveraged in Q1 2021, these pages are nearly identical (save for a different link, a different title of the document the user was searching for, and some slight modification to the icons of the fake forum users). Arete observed similarities between the watering hole leveraged by REvil and the watering hole leveraged by BlackMatter (Figure 1, Figure 3, and Figure 4). Similar behavior was previously reported for other Gootloader campaigns, including but not limited to matching “forum themes” and multi-language versions of the forums.

Figure 3 – Comparing REvil to BlackMatter Gootloader-involved attack lifecycle.

Figure 4 – Gootloader JS payload diff.
Dynamic analysis of the BlackMatter Gootloader sample resulted in different domain callouts for command-and-control (C2) infrastructure when compared against the older Gootloader sample associated with the Q1 2021 REvil attack. Those domain callouts are documented below for incorporation into EDR/HIDS/NIDS:

While it’s impossible to confirm with absolute certainty the linkage between REvil and BlackMatter, it is notable that both groups share a similar initial access tactic of leveraging fake forum posts weaponized with Gootloader, coupled with SEO hijacking, to gain an initial foothold in targeted environments.
The Arete Threat Intelligence and Forensics teams continue to monitor any potential changes to TTPs for BlackMatter or the re-emergence of REvil.
Acknowledgements
Arete would like to acknowledge the contributions of Senior Forensic Analyst Robert Christine for documenting and timelining the indicators and observables that led to this discovery.
Back to Blog Posts
Article
Ransomware Trends & Data Insights: July 2026
INC Ransom was the most active threat group in July, while activity remained relatively distributed among multiple threat groups, with 19 unique groups observed throughout the month. Alongside INC Ransom, Qilin, Global Secret Group, Anubis, and DragonForce rounded out the five most active threat groups observed in July. Several emerging threat actors were also observed during the month, including Booba Team, Settra, and Global Secret Group.

Figure 1. Activity from the top 3 threat groups in July 2026
Throughout the month, analysts at Arete identified several trends behind the threat actors perpetrating cybercrime activities:
In July 2026, Global Secret Group emerged as a new threat actor, leveraging the leaked LockBit 3.0 (LockBit Black) source code. Although the group began operations in June 2026, it quickly accumulated a substantial number of victims on its data leak site (DLS). The group operates through TOR-based negotiation portals and qTox communications. Notably, its DLS provides step-by-step guidance on purchasing Bitcoin, including references to Coinbase and Binance, demonstrating a streamlined, victim-focused extortion process designed to simplify ransom payments.
Similar to Fulcrumsec, the recently emerged Settra ransomware group appears to leverage AI-driven analysis of stolen data, publishing detailed and highly structured victim reports on its DLS. Additionally, a potential EDR-disabling tool, edr_blind.exe, was identified in multiple cases, suggesting a focus on defense-evasion capabilities.
With the continuation of the FortiBleed campaign, researchers have now identified compromised FortiGate credentials being leveraged by both the INC and Lynx ransomware operations. Analysis revealed direct operational links between the groups, including shared ransomware infrastructure and overlap between FortiBleed victims and ransomware targets. The operators are also incorporating AI to enhance various stages of the attack lifecycle and increase operational efficiency and scale. Notably, Arete also observed an INC ransomware intrusion leveraging FortiBleed-derived access in July, reinforcing the campaign's role as a precursor to ransomware deployment.
Sources
Arete Internal
Podcast
Cyber Campfire: June Threat Trends & Insights
In this episode of Arete’s Cyber Campfire podcast, our Threat Intelligence Team discusses trends, statistics, and emerging threat actors from June 2026. Tune in for firsthand insights on today’s threat landscape that can enhance your approach to cyber risk.
Article
Current: Misconfigured Server Reveals Multiple Phishing Campaigns
Researchers uncovered three Microsoft 365 phishing campaigns after discovering a misconfigured HTTP server that exposed a threat actor’s phishing tools, configurations, victim logs, and operational infrastructure. The investigation revealed two operators using custom Evilginx-based adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing frameworks to steal authentication sessions and bypass MFA protections. A third operator abused Microsoft’s OAuth Device Code flow by tricking victims into completing authentication through Microsoft’s legitimate login process, allowing attackers to obtain valid access and refresh tokens without stealing passwords. The largest campaign compromised at least 218 victims across 12 countries, primarily targeting corporate Microsoft 365 accounts, with refresh tokens enabling persistent access. Researchers also identified the use of remote management tools for maintaining access, AI-assisted development of phishing tooling, and links to broader Phishing-as-a-Service (PhaaS) ecosystems, highlighting how commodity frameworks and automation are lowering the barrier for sophisticated identity-based attacks.
What’s Notable and Unique
The campaigns demonstrate the continued shift from traditional credential theft to identity- and token-based compromise, in which attackers target authentication sessions, cookies, and OAuth tokens rather than relying solely on password theft. By obtaining valid authentication artifacts, attackers can access Microsoft 365 environments while bypassing conventional MFA protections.
The use of Evilginx-based AiTM frameworks highlights how publicly available phishing tools have evolved into effective MFA-bypass platforms. These frameworks proxy legitimate login pages, capture authenticated sessions, and allow attackers to reuse valid sessions without requiring victims’ credentials again.
The OAuth Device Code flow abuse represents a different attack method, in which attackers leverage a legitimate Microsoft authentication mechanism to obtain tokens after victims approve the request. This approach bypasses password theft entirely by abusing trusted authentication workflows.
The exposed infrastructure provided insight into attacker operations, including phishing configurations, victim tracking data, remote administration tools, and evidence of AI-assisted development. The findings demonstrate how phishing ecosystems now provide reusable tooling and automation that reduce the technical expertise required to conduct large-scale identity attacks.
Analyst Comments
These Microsoft 365 phishing campaigns demonstrate the ongoing evolution of identity-focused attacks, as adversaries increasingly target authentication sessions, tokens, and legitimate cloud authorization mechanisms to bypass traditional security controls. The combination of AiTM phishing, OAuth abuse, remote management tools, and PhaaS infrastructure enables threat actors to maintain persistent access while blending into legitimate cloud activity.
The growing availability of phishing frameworks and AI-assisted attack development highlights the need for continuous identity security improvements beyond traditional phishing defenses. Arete recommends that organizations strengthen identity monitoring, adopt phishing-resistant MFA where possible, review OAuth application permissions, monitor token activity, and implement conditional access policies to detect and restrict suspicious Microsoft 365 authentication behavior. Security teams should also monitor post-compromise indicators such as abnormal mailbox access, suspicious application consent, unauthorized remote tools, and unusual sign-in activity.
Sources
One Misconfigured Server, Three Active Campaigns: Full exposure of three AiTM Phishing Operators
Misconfigured Server Reveals Three Evilginx Phishing Operations Targeting Microsoft 365
Podcast
Digital Forensics Meets the Courtroom: Insights on Expert Witness and Cyber-Related Litigation
In this episode of Bytes of Insight, host Vinny Sakore and special guest Dr. Bruce Hartley, Managing Director and Co-Founder of Advisory Services at Arete, discuss the evolving role of digital forensics and expert witness work in cybersecurity litigation. Tune in for firsthand insights on how Arete conducts post-breach investigations, what it takes to undergo cross-examination on the stand, and how emerging threats like AI-driven social engineering and third-party breaches are reshaping the advisory landscape.



