Article
Law Enforcement Actions Leave ALPHV/BlackCat Scrambling to Salvage Operations
Cyber Threats
Threat Actors
Combating Ransomware

Through a coordinated law enforcement effort spearheaded by the FBI, ALPHV/BlackCat infrastructure was disrupted on December 7, 2023, in an operation publicly announced on December 19, 2023. After terrorizing businesses and organizations for over two years, the notorious ransomware group may have finally met its match.
What happened to BlackCat’s Infrastructure?
On December 7, 2023, the data leak website for ALPHV/BlackCat went offline and remained offline for more than 30 hours. This is one of the most prolonged disruptions the group has faced, as it previously only experienced periodic outages due to technical hosting issues. The BlackCat data leak site came back online with all data from previous victims removed before apparently being taken down for good on December 19, 2023, when existing BlackCat branding was replaced by an FBI banner including a TOR-based tip line for information on BlackCat and its affiliates.

Figure 1: Law Enforcement Seizure Banner Displayed on Known ALPHV/BlackCat Data Leak Sites on December 19, 2023
The BlackCat Decryptor
Prior to the takedown of BlackCat’s infrastructure, law enforcement maintained access to the threat actor’s environment for months and was able to obtain victim-specific decryption keys to BlackCat’s ransomware executable by monitoring the environment. The FBI used these decryption keys to offer decryption to 500 BlackCat victims as the FBI neared publicizing the takedown. The FBI estimated they were able to save organizations a total of $68 million in ransom demands.
However, based on Arete data, this is likely a conservative number. With an average initial ransom demand of $2.28 million in 2023, BlackCat demands observed by Arete are significantly higher than the demands calculated by law enforcement. While ransom payments are often significantly discounted from the original $2.28 million demand following a negotiation process, it is possible that this action taken by law enforcement could have saved victim organizations as much as five times as what was assessed by the FBI. Alternatively, the gap between Arete and the FBI’s estimated ransom payments may indicate how many organizations had either already paid a ransom before the decryption keys were available or were able to recover without paying the ransom.
The After-Action Report
While the initial data leak site (DLS) disruption nearly two weeks ago caused BlackCat’s operations to decrease significantly, three new victims were posted to the DLS between when the site came back online and when it was finally seized by the FBI. In one of those postings, BlackCat claimed to have reported a new victim to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In the intervening period, Arete also responded to a BlackCat engagement in which the threat actors utilized an old BlackCat encryptor. Therefore, while the infrastructure takedown certainly disrupted the scale and speed of BlackCat operations, it did not stop the operations of all affiliates.
Shortly after the FBI announced the website seizure on December 19, 2023, ALPHV/BlackCat’s operators stood up a new data leak site and claimed their website was “unseized.” Security researchers assess that BlackCat operators maintained access to the keys used to sign the original data leak site but lost access to their original servers. After standing up the new data leak site, BlackCat made a new post about a victim and stated they will no longer give victims additional time to conduct negotiations. The operators also stated they will harass executive teams and their children, report companies to the SEC and US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and release a clearnet (regular internet) link to data on victims.

Figure 2 ALPHV/BlackCat Post Excerpt Uploaded December 19, 2023
With a lack of trust in their own infrastructure, BlackCat affiliates began communicating with victims directly via email rather than relying on typical communication methods. While attempting to continue operations to the best of their ability, BlackCat operators reportedly later discovered that law enforcement gained access to a compromised domain controller and issued a concerning statement to their affiliates, giving them permission to “take the gloves off” in future operations.
The statement shared that all previously observed rules, minus the inability to target CIS* countries, no longer apply to BlackCat affiliates, and an increased percentage of ransom payments, now 90%, will go to affiliates. Additionally, several targets that were reportedly previously forbidden, such as hospitals and nuclear power plants, are now fair game for affiliates to target with the BlackCat encryptor. Finally, BlackCat stated they will no longer accept discounts from the original ransom demand. With an average negotiated discount of 63% off the original ransom demand observed by Arete, the inability to negotiate could cost BlackCat victims millions of dollars if they choose to make ransom payments.
Who is ALPHV/BlackCat?
ALPHV/BlackCat is a ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) group that first emerged in November 2021. The group operates by providing ransomware software and infrastructure to other cybercriminals, who then use it to launch attacks on various targets. The group takes a cut of the ransom payments and leaks the stolen data of its victims on its Dark Web site. The group is also known for its unique extortion methods, which include reporting its victims to the SEC and creating false domains to impersonate victims and leak data.
Since its inception, ALPHV/BlackCat listed over 650 companies on its data leak site, making it one of the most prolific and dangerous ransomware groups active today. Throughout 2023, BlackCat was the most frequently observed ransomware group in Arete’s industry data. Among 56 different ransomware and extortion groups observed in 2023, BlackCat accounted for nearly a quarter of Arete’s overall engagements.

Figure 3: Visual from Arete’s Q3 2023 Crimeware Report
Affiliates of ALPHV/BlackCat include Scattered Spider, the ransomware group behind the brazen cyberattacks against MGM Resorts, Caesars, and more. The FBI and CISA issued a joint advisory about Scattered Spider in November 2023, warning of their use of ALPHV/BlackCat ransomware.
What are the implications of this takedown?
While the full implications of this takedown are currently unknown, it could have significant implications for the ransomware landscape. The takedown may disrupt the activities of many affiliates relying on ALPHV/BlackCat’s ransomware encryptor and infrastructure, likely forcing existing affiliates to move on to other ransomware programs or develop their own. Notably, LockBit ransomware quickly seized the opportunity to advertise that BlackCat affiliates could continue their current operations under LockBit’s RaaS operation. Additionally, this could lead to the emergence of new ransomware variants and groups, with affiliates bringing experience from previous programs. This happened before when law enforcement actions against other ransomware groups, such as DarkSide and REvil, resulted in the formation of new groups, like BlackMatter and Haron. Even before the FBI takedown, Arete observed a splintering of BlackCat affiliates, with groups like Scattered Spider conducting solo operations alongside operations using the BlackCat encryptor.
While the takedown of ALPHV/BlackCat’s websites is a positive development in the fight against ransomware, it is not a definitive victory. Ransomware remains a persistent and evolving threat that requires constant vigilance and collaboration from all stakeholders, including governments, businesses, and individuals.
BlackCat has been a widely impactful ransomware group, in part because it relied on affiliates with diverse means of compromising victims. Arete observed a wide variety of initial access measures in engagements involving ALPHV/BlackCat affiliates, including a sophisticated capability to exploit software and hardware vulnerabilities. Preventing BlackCat attacks and future ransomware attacks from affiliates that escape law enforcement requires a strong patch management program that prioritizes vulnerabilities with publicly released exploit code. Additionally, managing remote management tools in an environment is critical in preventing similar attacks. Arete identified third-party remote access tools as the initial intrusion method in more than eight percent of ALPHV/BlackCat engagements, but analysis of the full lifecycle of an ALPHV/BlackCat engagement showed those tools being used throughout the attacks to enable attacker operations. Neither method is unique to BlackCat operators and remains an important focus for defenders.
Footnotes
*The Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) is a regional intergovernmental organization formed following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, including Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Armenia, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, and Turkmenistan.
Sources
Back to Blog Posts
Article
Canvas Platform Compromised by ShinyHunters
In early May, the ShinyHunters threat group claimed responsibility for a large-scale cyberattack on the Canvas learning management platform, affecting almost 9,000 educational institutions worldwide. Instructure, the education technology company that owns Canvas, confirmed the intrusion and, on May 11th, announced that a settlement was reached with the threat actor. According to the statement, the settlement included return of the stolen data to Instructure, assurance of destruction of any copies of the data, and assurance that no Canvas users would be extorted for additional ransom payments.
Unauthorized activity was first detected in Canvas on April 29th and was reportedly the result of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Leveraging the same vulnerability, the threat actor conducted a follow-up attack on May 7th, replacing the login screens of Canvas users at hundreds of institutions with a message from ShinyHunters, claiming responsibility for the attack and displaying a list of impacted schools and the threat actor’s contact information.
By May 8th, neither Canvas nor Instructure was posted on ShinyHunter’s data leak site (DLS), and instead a vague “Press Statement” indicated that the group would not comment on the incident. On May 9th, Instructure shared another update, indicating that Canvas was “fully back online and available for use,” along with updates to the company’s FAQ page.

Figure 1. Press statement on ShinyHunters DLS (Source: Arete)
ShinyHunters: Not Just For Pokémon Anymore
ShinyHunters is a predominantly English-speaking cybercriminal group first observed in 2020 that focuses on data exfiltration and extortion. During its early operational phase, the group carried out a series of data breaches targeting organizations, including Tokopedia, Wattpad, and Nitro PDF, establishing a reputation for compromising and monetizing large datasets. Over this period, ShinyHunters remained heavily centered on a “pay or leak” model, leveraging stolen data to pressure victims into ransom payments or selling the information on underground forums when demands were not met.
As the group matured, it evolved beyond opportunistic database theft into a more sophisticated threat actor capable of executing complex, large-scale intrusion campaigns. ShinyHunters has since demonstrated an ability to target higher‑profile industries, including telecommunications, aviation, and enterprise software-as-a-service (SaaS) platforms, by leveraging advanced tactics such as social engineering, SaaS abuse, and supply chain compromise.
The group went as far as to partner with two other threat groups to form the Scattered Lapsus$ Hunters (SLH) collective in early 2025. Playing to each group’s strengths, SLH leveraged compromised OAuth tokens from the Salesloft Drift integration in an advanced supply-chain attack that led to the exfiltration of data across hundreds of Salesforce instances. Despite multiple law enforcement actions and arrests linked to its members, the group has remained operational under the same branding for several years. This persistence highlights the group’s resilience and adaptability, suggesting an operational model that can evolve in response to external pressures.
Analyst Comments
Given the group’s track record, ShinyHunters is likely to continue conducting large-scale data theft and extortion operations while further engraining itself within the broader cybercriminal ecosystem. This recent incident highlights the disproportionate impact of cyberattacks against supply chain vendors like SaaS platforms, open-source ecosystems, MSPs, and cloud integrations, where a breach on one platform can affect thousands of organizations. Any organizations impacted by the recent Canvas incident should not attempt any communication with the threat actor and should continue to follow any future guidance posted on Instructure’s Incident Update & FAQ page.
Sources
Security Incident Update & FAQs
Canvas login portals hacked in mass ShinyHunters extortion campaign
ShinyHunters: A Threat Profile
ShinyHunters
Scattered LAPSUS$ Hunters: Anatomy of a Federated Cybercriminal Brand
FBI warns of UNC6040, UNC6395 hackers stealing Salesforce data
Article
Critical MOVEit Automation Vulnerabilities Disclosed
A security advisory released by Progress Software details critical and high-severity vulnerabilities affecting their MOVEit Automation managed file transfer (MFT) solution. The vulnerabilities, tracked as CVE-2026-4670 and CVE-2026-5174, could allow a threat actor to bypass authentication and escalate privileges, leading to unauthorized access, administrative control, and data exposure. Cybercriminals have leveraged several MFT tools in previous campaigns, including the Accellion File Transfer Application (FTA), Fortra GoAnywhere MFT, and Cleo MFT. Flaws in MFT software are highly targeted by cybercriminals due to the volume and sensitivity of the data they control.
What’s Notable and Unique
MOVEit Transfer was heavily exploited by the Cl0p ransomware group in the summer of 2023. While the window of exploit activity lasted only a few weeks, victim extortion and data leaks continued throughout the remainder of the year, leading to more than 70 class-action lawsuits filed in the U.S.
There is no workaround or hotfix for these vulnerabilities. To fully patch the flaws, MOVEit administrators need to perform a "full install" of the latest version, which will require taking the system offline.
Security researchers have discovered ~1,400 MOVEit Automation instances exposed to the internet, with dozens belonging to U.S. local and state government agencies.
Analyst Comments
While the vulnerabilities patched in Progress Software's recent release differ from the SQL injection vulnerability exploited by the Cl0p ransomware group in 2023, exploitation of CVE-2026-4670 and CVE-2026-5174 could lead to equally impactful outcomes. Beyond the immediate impacts on affected organizations, trusted data-exchange platforms provide threat actors with an avenue to obtain sensitive information and infect partner and supplier environments. Furthermore, Arete has seen the time window between disclosure and weaponization of critical vulnerabilities continue to shrink, especially as threat actors increasingly adopt AI-enabled tooling. As such, organizations should not only implement the patches released by Progress Software, but also hunt for typical post-compromise behavior like enumeration of the underlying database, the creation of new user accounts or users operating with unexpected administrator privileges, and the presence of unauthorized remote monitoring and management (RMM) tools.
Sources
MOVEit Automation Critical Security Alert Bulletin – April 2026 – (CVE-2026-4670, CVE-2026-5174)
From Breach to Courtroom: Inside the MOVEit Exploitation and Mass Litigation
Progress warns of critical MOVEit Automation auth bypass flaw
Article
Ransomware Trends & Data Insights: April 2026
The threat landscape has remained relatively predictable thus far in 2026. In April, Qilin dethroned Akira as the most active threat group for the month. Akira, who had been the top ransomware threat each month since July 2025, was still only slightly behind Qilin and had roughly the same activity level as in March. INC Ransom and DragonForce also remained active threats in April, with those four ransomware groups accounting for half of all ransomware and extortion activity observed by Arete.

Figure 1. Activity from the top 3 threat groups in April 2026
Throughout the month, analysts at Arete identified several trends behind the threat actors perpetrating cybercrime activities:
Multiple ransomware operations continue to leverage the Bring Your Own Vulnerable Driver (BYOVD) technique to disable endpoint security controls prior to ransomware deployment. Qilin has recently been observed leveraging a malicious file loaded via DLL side-loading along with vulnerable drivers, including rwdrv.sys and hlpdrv.sys, to gain kernel-level access and disable security processes. Arete observed Akira using the same vulnerable drivers in multiple engagements dating back to Q3 2025.
DragonForce has leveraged several of the same tools in recent engagements, including the remote desktop application Remotely Agent and the PoisonX.sys vulnerable driver. Additionally, open-source reporting indicates that the group recently used a Python-based backdoor known as VIPERTUNNEL to maintain reliable operator access and evade detection. DragonForce was responsible for over 7% of Arete ransomware engagements in April, and Arete notes increased activity from the group this year compared to 2025.
A social engineering tactic has reemerged in recent months in which threat actors impersonate IT and helpdesk staff via Microsoft Teams to contact employees and attempt to convince them to install remote access tools like Quick Assist, giving the threat actors remote access to the victim’s environment. This tactic was initially observed in late 2024 and early 2025 and was linked to now-defunct groups like Black Basta and Cactus, but has more recently been observed in intrusions linked to the Akira and Payouts King ransomware groups.
Sources
Arete Internal
Article
Payouts King Utilizes QEMU Emulator to Bypass EDR
Researchers recently identified threat actor campaigns leveraging QEMU, a free open-source virtual machine (VM) emulator, to evade endpoint security solutions. Since QEMU acts as a VM within the target environment, endpoint detection tools cannot scan inside the emulator or detect any malicious files or payloads QEMU contains. Although threat actors have been utilizing QEMU maliciously since 2020, recent activity is attributed to the Payouts King ransomware group and a cluster of threat actors believed to be initial access brokers who have also been exploiting the CitrixBleed2 vulnerability CVE-2025-5777.
What’s Notable and Unique
Payouts King has been observed deploying QEMU since November and uses the VM to create a reverse SSH backdoor to evade detection and install various tools, including Rclone, Chisel, and BusyBox.
In a separate campaign, threat actors are exploiting CVE-2025-5777, a Citrix NetScaler vulnerability that allows attackers to bypass authentication. Once they’ve gained initial access, the threat actors use QEMU to deploy tools inside the VM, which are then used to steal credentials, identify Kerberos usernames, perform Active Directory reconnaissance, and set up FTP servers for staging or data exfiltration.
Analyst Comments
Threat actors continue to focus their efforts on defense evasion, often leveraging legitimate, easily accessible tools such as QEMU. The continued use of QEMU by multiple threat actors highlights the effectiveness of these tactics and the difficulty in detecting and defending against them. To counter this campaign, organizations should proactively monitor for unauthorized QEMU installations, abnormal scheduled tasks, and port forwarding rules.
Sources
QEMU abused to evade detection and enable ransomware delivery



