Article
LockBit 5.0: The RaaS That Refuses to Go Away
Arete Analysis

The once-prolific LockBit group appears to have reemerged, recently deploying an updated “LockBit 5.0” variant of its ransomware. Although the Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) group has been trying to reestablish its brand since international law enforcement disrupted the group’s infrastructure in early 2024, this latest effort appears to be a return to form.
LockBit first announced the 5.0 version on the RAMP dark web forum in early September 2025, coinciding with the group’s six-year anniversary. In early December 2025, the group posted an announcement on its old data leak site (DLS) with a link to its new Christmas-themed LockBit 5.0 DLS. Since then, the group has already posted over 100 alleged victims to the new DLS.

Figure 1. LockBit’s new “5.0” DLS (Source: Arete)
A Long History of LockBit Variants
According to researchers, the 5.0 variant has numerous code overlaps with the LockBit 4.0 variant and appears to be the latest in a series of evolving ransomware versions observed since the group first emerged in September 2019.
In June 2021, LockBit released version 2.0, also known as LockBit Red, followed by a Linux version released in October 2021 that could be deployed on Linux and VMware ESXi systems.
In March 2022, the group released version 3.0, which was also known as LockBit Black. The builder for this LockBit 3.0 variant was subsequently leaked by a disgruntled affiliate in June 2023. Since then, this leaked builder has been used by a number of unaffiliated threat actors, even after law enforcement’s disruption of the LockBit RaaS in 2024.
Following the leak of the LockBit Black builder, the group released a LockBit Green version in January 2023, followed by a macOS version in April 2023.
In February 2024, international law enforcement disrupted LockBit’s operations, seizing the group’s DLS along with numerous websites and servers used by LockBit administrators. In May 2024, international law enforcement revealed that Russian national Dmitry Yuryevich Khoroshev, who went by the alias LockBitSupp, was the developer and administrator of the LockBit RaaS. Khoroshev was sanctioned by the US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), the UK’s Foreign Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), and the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs.
In December 2024, LockBit announced the release of LockBit 4.0, with the new version becoming available to affiliates in February 2025. However, the group remained quiet for most of 2025, and Arete never observed any incidents involving the 4.0 version during the year.
The latest LockBit 5.0 variant has both Windows and Linux versions, with notable improvements, including anti-analysis features and unique 16-character extensions added to each encrypted file. Ransom notes for the 5.0 version direct victims to Tor chat panels, similar to those the group used before law enforcement’s disruptions.
Analyst Comments
Despite the number of victims initially posted to the new DLS, it remains to be seen whether LockBit will return to consistent activity levels in 2026. With the group continuing to operate under the LockBit brand, the sanctions against Khoroshev should inhibit victims contemplating payment for LockBit 5.0 decryption keys, creating a substantial barrier to the group reclaiming its place as one of the top RaaS organizations. If the group becomes an increasingly active threat in 2026, the OFAC sanction implications make it exceedingly important for organizations to have adequate data protection and security practices in place to be able to recover from potential encryption and extortion attacks without payment.
Back to Blog Posts
Article
Ransomware Trends & Data Insights: March 2026
The threat landscape in March had a much more even distribution of threat groups than has been observed since the first half of 2025. Although Akira, Qilin, Play, and INC remained among the most active groups, Arete observed 21 unique ransomware and extortion groups in March, compared to only 15 in February. Akira and Qilin’s activity also declined from the previous month; in February, the two groups were responsible for almost half of all ransomware incidents, but in March they only comprised a little more than a quarter of all activity. Arete also observed activity from several emerging groups in the past month, including BravoX, NightSpire, Payouts King, and Securotrop.

Figure 1. Activity from the top 5 threat groups in March 2026
Analysts at Arete identified several trends behind the threat actors perpetrating cybercrime activities:
In March, threat actors actively exploited FortiGate Next-Generation Firewall appliances as initial access vectors to compromise enterprise networks. The activity involves the exploitation of recently disclosed security vulnerabilities, including CVE-2025-59718, CVE-2025-59719, and CVE-2026-24858, or weak credentials, allowing attackers to gain administrative access, extract configuration files, and obtain service account credentials. Arete also observed Fortinet device exploitation involving various threat groups, with the Qilin ransomware group notably leveraging Fortinet device exploits.
Phishing campaigns leveraging OAuth redirection and a resurgence of Microsoft Teams–based social engineering were also observed in March. In one campaign, attackers sent emails disguised as Microsoft Teams recordings or Microsoft 365 alerts, redirecting victims through legitimate OAuth endpoints to attacker-controlled pages hosting malicious ZIP payloads. A separate campaign has been ongoing since last year, in which attackers flood users’ inboxes with spam and impersonate IT support personnel to trick victims into initiating remote support sessions via tools like Quick Assist.
Arete recently released its 2025 Annual Crimeware Report. Leveraging data and intelligence collected during ransomware and extortion incident response engagements, this report highlights notable trends and shifts in the threat landscape throughout 2025, including Akira’s unusually high activity levels in the second half of 2025, evolving social engineering techniques, and trends in ransom demands and impacted industries.
Sources
Arete Internal
Report
Arete's 2025 Annual Crimeware Report
Harness Arete’s unique data and expertise on extortion and ransomware to inform your response to the evolving threat landscape.
Article
FortiGate Exploits Enable Network Breaches and Credential Theft
A recent security report indicates that threat actors are actively exploiting FortiGate Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW) appliances as initial access vectors to compromise enterprise networks. The activity leverages recently disclosed vulnerabilities or weak credentials to gain unauthorized access and extract configuration files, which often contain sensitive information, including service account credentials and detailed network topology data.
Analysis of these incidents shows significant variation in attacker dwell time, ranging from immediate lateral movement to delays of up to two months post-compromise. Since these appliances often integrate with authentication systems such as Active Directory and Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP), their compromise can grant attackers extensive access, substantially increasing the risk of widespread network intrusion and data exposure.
What’s Notable and Unique
The activity involves the exploitation of recently disclosed security vulnerabilities, including CVE-2025-59718, CVE-2025-59719, and CVE-2026-24858, or weak credentials, allowing attackers to gain administrative access, extract configuration files, and obtain service account credentials and network topology information.
In one observed incident, attackers created a FortiGate admin account with unrestricted firewall rules and maintained access over time, consistent with initial access broker activity. After a couple of months, threat actors extracted and decrypted LDAP credentials to compromise Active Directory.
In another case, attackers moved from FortiGate access to deploying remote access tools, including Pulseway and MeshAgent, while also utilizing cloud infrastructure such as Google Cloud Storage and Amazon Web Services (AWS).
Analyst Comments
Arete has identified multiple instances of Fortinet device exploitation for initial access, involving various threat actors, with the Qilin ransomware group notably leveraging Fortinet device exploits. Given their integration with systems like Active Directory, NGFW appliances remain high-value targets for both state-aligned and financially motivated actors. In parallel, Arete has observed recent dark web activity involving leaked FortiGate VPN access, further highlighting the expanding risk landscape. This aligns with the recent reporting from Amazon Threat Intelligence, which identified large-scale compromises of FortiGate devices driven by exposed management ports and weak authentication, rather than vulnerability exploitation. Overall, these developments underscore the increasing focus on network edge devices as entry points, reinforcing the need for organizations to strengthen authentication, restrict external exposure, and address fundamental security gaps to mitigate the risk of widespread compromise.
Sources
FortiGate Edge Intrusions | Stolen Service Accounts Lead to Rogue Workstations and Deep AD Compromise
Article
Vulnerability Discovered in Anthropic’s Claude Code
Security researchers discovered two critical vulnerabilities in Anthropic's agentic AI coding tool, Claude Code. The vulnerabilities, tracked as CVE-2025-59536 and CVE-2026-21852, allowed attackers to achieve remote code execution and to compromise a victim's API credentials. The vulnerabilities exploit maliciously crafted repository configurations to circumvent control mechanisms. It should be noted that Anthropic worked closely with the security researchers throughout the process, and the bugs were patched before the research was published.
What’s Notable and Unique
The configuration files .claude/settings.json and .mcp.json were repurposed to execute malicious commands. Because the configurations could be applied immediately upon starting Claude Code, the commands ran before the user could deny permissions via a dialogue prompt, or they bypassed the authentication prompt altogether.
.claude/settings.json also defines the endpoint for all Claude Code API communications. By replacing the default localhost URL with a URL they own, an attacker could redirect traffic to infrastructure they control. Critically, the authentication traffic generated upon starting Claude Code included the user's full Anthropic API key in plain text and was sent before the user could interact with the trust dialogue.
Restrictive permissions on sensitive files could be bypassed by simply prompting Claude Code to create a copy of the file's contents, which did not inherit the original file's permissions. A threat actor using a stolen API key could gain complete read and write access to all files within a workspace.
Analyst Comments
The vulnerabilities and attack paths detailed in the research illustrate the double-edged nature of AI tools. The speed, scale, and convenience characteristics that make AI tools attractive to developer teams also benefit threat actors who use them for nefarious purposes. Defenders should expect adversaries to continue seeking ways to exploit configurations and orchestration logic to increase the impact of their attacks. Organizations planning to implement AI development tools should prioritize AI supply-chain hygiene and CI/CD hardening practices.
Sources
Caught in the Hook: RCE and API Token Exfiltration Through Claude Code Project Files | CVE-2025-59536 | CVE-2026-21852



