EXPLORE

Article

LockBit 5.0: The RaaS That Refuses to Go Away

Arete Analysis

The once-prolific LockBit group appears to have reemerged, recently deploying an updated “LockBit 5.0” variant of its ransomware. Although the Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) group has been trying to reestablish its brand since international law enforcement disrupted the group’s infrastructure in early 2024, this latest effort appears to be a return to form.

LockBit first announced the 5.0 version on the RAMP dark web forum in early September 2025, coinciding with the group’s six-year anniversary. In early December 2025, the group posted an announcement on its old data leak site (DLS) with a link to its new Christmas-themed LockBit 5.0 DLS. Since then, the group has already posted over 100 alleged victims to the new DLS.

Figure 1. LockBit’s new “5.0” DLS (Source: Arete)

A Long History of LockBit Variants

According to researchers, the 5.0 variant has numerous code overlaps with the LockBit 4.0 variant and appears to be the latest in a series of evolving ransomware versions observed since the group first emerged in September 2019.

  • In June 2021, LockBit released version 2.0, also known as LockBit Red, followed by a Linux version released in October 2021 that could be deployed on Linux and VMware ESXi systems.

  • In March 2022, the group released version 3.0, which was also known as LockBit Black. The builder for this LockBit 3.0 variant was subsequently leaked by a disgruntled affiliate in June 2023. Since then, this leaked builder has been used by a number of unaffiliated threat actors, even after law enforcement’s disruption of the LockBit RaaS in 2024.

  • Following the leak of the LockBit Black builder, the group released a LockBit Green version in January 2023, followed by a macOS version in April 2023.

  • In February 2024, international law enforcement disrupted LockBit’s operations, seizing the group’s DLS along with numerous websites and servers used by LockBit administrators. In May 2024, international law enforcement revealed that Russian national Dmitry Yuryevich Khoroshev, who went by the alias LockBitSupp, was the developer and administrator of the LockBit RaaS. Khoroshev was sanctioned by the US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), the UK’s Foreign Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), and the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs.

  • In December 2024, LockBit announced the release of LockBit 4.0, with the new version becoming available to affiliates in February 2025. However, the group remained quiet for most of 2025, and Arete never observed any incidents involving the 4.0 version during the year.

The latest LockBit 5.0 variant has both Windows and Linux versions, with notable improvements, including anti-analysis features and unique 16-character extensions added to each encrypted file. Ransom notes for the 5.0 version direct victims to Tor chat panels, similar to those the group used before law enforcement’s disruptions.
 

Analyst Comments

Despite the number of victims initially posted to the new DLS, it remains to be seen whether LockBit will return to consistent activity levels in 2026. With the group continuing to operate under the LockBit brand, the sanctions against Khoroshev should inhibit victims contemplating payment for LockBit 5.0 decryption keys, creating a substantial barrier to the group reclaiming its place as one of the top RaaS organizations. If the group becomes an increasingly active threat in 2026, the OFAC sanction implications make it exceedingly important for organizations to have adequate data protection and security practices in place to be able to recover from potential encryption and extortion attacks without payment.


Back to Blog Posts

Article

Arete's 2026 Q1 Crimeware Report

Harness Arete’s unique data and expertise on extortion and ransomware to inform your response to the evolving threat landscape.

Article

CMS Vulnerability Leads to ClickFix Campaign

Threat actors compromised at least 700 education and technology websites in a recent ClickFix campaign by exploiting a critical SQL injection flaw (CVE-2026-26980) in the Ghost content management system (CMS). Adversaries combined the vulnerability with the ClickFix social engineering tactic to steal admin keys and inject a malicious JavaScript that delivers a fake Cloudflare or CAPTCHA verification pop-up, tricking victims into copying and pasting a malicious command into their systems.

What’s Notable and Unique

  • Rather than targeting the end user first, this campaign is unique in its initial exploitation of the system, followed by social engineering attempts. This hybrid attack style is likely being leveraged to bypass traditional defenses.

  • This recent campaign also highlights how trusted web properties can be weaponized at scale and coupled with unpatched CMS vulnerabilities. Rather than using the CMS compromise to perpetrate a single attack, threat actors turned it into a supply-chain attack that ultimately affected over 700 trusted websites.

Analyst Comments

As network defenders and their tools enhance threat detection capabilities, adversaries increasingly seek methods to bypass these defenses. By combining vulnerability exploitation, social engineering techniques, and staging for ancillary attacks, this campaign successfully bypassed traditional defenses and inflicted significant impact. Defending against hybrid cyberattacks requires comprehensive security controls beyond simply patching vulnerabilities. Organizations should focus on limiting movement within the environment, detecting abuse of trusted applications, and preventing end-user manipulation.

Sources

  • 700+ education and tech websites hijacked in huge ClickFix malware campaign

  • Under the engineering hood: Why Malwarebytes chose WordPress as its CMS

  • Think before you Click(Fix): Analyzing the ClickFix social engineering technique

  • Ghost CMS Vulnerability Exploited to Infect 700 Sites With ClickFix Malware

Article

Threat Actors Leverage Fake JPEG Files for Initial Access

In a recent campaign, researchers observed threat actors using fake JPEG image files as a delivery mechanism to initiate the deployment of additional malicious components. The false JPEG files are typically distributed via phishing emails or other social engineering-based lures, and are actually PowerShell-based malware that deploys a trojanized version of ConnectWise ScreenConnect to establish and maintain persistence in the compromised environment. 

What’s Notable and Unique

  • This campaign leverages JPEG images as the initial lure, where the images are not merely decoys but part of the infection workflow. Victims are typically led to download or open an image that triggers hidden execution logic or redirects them to a payload-delivery sequence that initiates later stages of the intrusion chain. 

  • The attack chain is designed to blend into legitimate environments, making detection more difficult. Execution typically relies on scripted or native Windows components, often including PowerShell or other living-off-the-land binaries, enabling fileless or near-fileless execution and reducing forensic artifacts on disk.

  • The multistage design ensures that the initial JPEG does not directly contain the full payload but instead triggers retrieval or decryption steps that progressively assemble the final malicious components in memory.

Analyst Comments

This campaign illustrates how threat actors continue to blur the line between legitimate file handling and malicious execution chains, indicating potential overlap with remote management or administrative tooling. The use of JPEG-based staging combined with script-based execution reflects a broader evolution toward a stealth-first intrusion design, in which file formats serve as triggers rather than payload containers.

Sources

  • OPERATION SILENTCANVAS : JPEG BASED MULTISTAGE POWERSHELL INTRUSION

Podcast

Cyber Risk and Insurance for Law Firms

In this episode of Bytes of Insight, host Vinny Sakore is joined by Laura Zaroski, Managing Director of the Law Firms Group at Gallagher, as they discuss the evolution of cyber risk for law firms. Tune in for firsthand insights on how to select the right cyber policy, the incident response process, and the nuances of ransom payments and sensitive data.