EXPLORE

Report

Malware Spotlight: Fog Ransomware

Arete Analysis

Tips

Cybersecurity Trends

Download The Report

Executive Summary

Since April 2024, Arete’s Incident Response (IR) team has responded to multiple engagements attributed to the Fog ransomware group. Engagements attributed to this group have been trending up since mid-June and through July 2024, accounting for nearly 20% of Arete’s ransomware and extortion engagements in July. The Fog ransomware group is especially noteworthy as it is one of the few threat actors specifically targeting one industry: education. Since April, Arete has observed that 70% of Fog victims have been education organizations. This spotlight explores the ransomware group’s observed behavior, background information on the threat actor, and statistics from Incident Response engagements, along with a technical analysis of Fog’s ransomware executable. Finally, we discuss security recommendations to better defend against this evolving cyber threat and mitigate the risk of financial and reputation losses.

Incident Response Data on the Fog Ransomware Group

The information below is based on Fog ransomware incidents investigated by Arete since April 2024. Our IR, Threat Intelligence, and Data Analytics teams work together to analyze key data points during every ransomware engagement and form real-time threat actor (TA) insights.

  • The median initial demand is $220,000.

  • The median ransom payment facilitated is $100,000.

  • 36% of engagements involved data exfiltration, often using tools like MEGAsync and Filezilla.

  • Common initial access vectors include brute force attacks against remote desktop protocol (RDP) and compromised virtual private network (VPN) credentials.

  • Tools observed during investigations include CobaltStrike, Mimikatz, ngrok, WinRAR, AnyDesk, Advanced Port Scanner, and GMER, among others. The group demonstrates distinct skill in evading common anti-malware defenses.

  • The ransom note file name is commonly “readme.txt” and includes a link to a TOR site used for negotiations.

  • The group operates a data leak site (DLS) self-proclaimed as “The Fog Blog.”

Background

Fog ransomware was a prominent newcomer in the second quarter (Q2) of 2024 and demonstrated a noticeable trend of attacking entities in the education sector. Arete engagements involving Fog ransomware more than doubled during July 2024 compared to previous months.

Technical Analysis

Malware analysis revealed that Fog ransomware:

  • Supports multiple command-line arguments.

  • Encrypts files on the system and mounted shares.

  • Adds the following extensions to encrypted files: .fog, .ffog, or .flocked (e.g., file.docx.flocked).

  • Creates a ransom note with the following filename: readme.txt.

  • Self-identifies the group as Fog in the ransom note.

  • References a data leak site in the ransom note that, when accessed, self-identifies the group as Fog.

  • Kills a list of processes and services.

  • Maintains a list of whitelisted files and directories to make sure it will not render the system unusable, preventing recovery when running a decryptor.

  • Attempts to prevent system recovery by deleting the system’s volume shadow copies.

  • Creates a mutex during execution.

  • Creates a log file named DbgLog.sys.Execution Pattern/Arguments

Fog ransomware needs command line arguments to execute and encrypt files in the system. Command line arguments supported:

Command line arguments

Description

-id

Key to decrypt ransomware configuration.

-nomutex

Skip mutex check.

-target

Specific location to encrypt files.

-console

Creates a new console window for output.

-size

File size threshold to encrypt.

-log

Log the ransomware activity.

-procoff

Presently unknown.

-uncoff

Presently unknown.

The ransomware will not execute in the system without the “-id” argument followed by a 6-character value that is unique in each engagement.

Execution of the ransomware to encrypt files:

Fog.exe -id [6-characters]

Example:
Fog.exe -id A9p3RZ

Figure 1. Code in the ransomware to check command line argument “-ID”


The ransomware uses the “-id” argument followed by a 6-character value to decrypt a JSON-based ransomware configuration information at runtime. Decrypted JSON field name and descriptions:

Name
Description

RSAPubKey

Public key used in the file encryption process.

LockedExt

Extension added to encrypted files.

NoteFileName

Ransom note name.

PathStopList

Excludes listed directories.

FileMaskStopList

Excludes listed file extensions.

ShutdownProcesses

Terminates list of processes.

ShutdownServices

Terminates list of services.


Stop Services and Processes

Before file encryption, the ransomware terminates a pre-determined list of processes and services to encrypt as many files as possible.

Process names:

“notepad.exe”, “calc.exe”, “*sql*”

Service names:

“Dhcp”, “Dnscache”, “*sql*”

Code in the ransomware showing this operation:

Figure 2. Process termination decompiled code

Figure 3. Service termination decompiled code


File and Directory Exclusions

The ransomware excludes system-related files and folders, ransomware-related files, and whitelisted extensions during encryption.

Excluded file extensions:

“*.exe”, “*.dll”, “*.lnk”, “*.sys”

Excluded directories:

“tmp”, “winnt”, “Application Data”, “AppData”, “temp”, “thumb”, “$Recycle.Bin”, “System Volume Information”, “Windows”, “Boot”


Inhibit System Recovery

Windows operating systems contain features that can help fix corrupted system files, including shadow copies, which are backups of files created by the Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS). By deleting shadow copies, the ransomware can prevent victims from restoring files from backups, making it more difficult for them to recover their data without paying the ransom.

The ransomware deletes volume shadow copies before file encryption by starting the following process:

cmd.exe /c vssadmin delete shadows /all /quiet

System Network Connections Discovery

Fog ransomware can enumerate network-mounted shares by scanning the network interfaces.

Data Encrypted for Impact

The ransomware initially finds available drives and then loads the files one by one using the Windows API FindFirstFileW and FindNextFileW. The ransomware generates random AES keys to encrypt the files, and after encrypting them, the keys are encrypted using a public RSA key. The resulting key is again encrypted and placed at the end of the file.

Figure 4. Data encryption code

Figure 5. Extension added to the encrypted files

Figure 6. Encrypted AES key appended to encrypted file.

Fog ransomware extensions observed:

“.FOG”, “.FLOCKED”, “.FFOG”

During execution, the ransomware creates a file named DbgLog.sys in the same directory and logs the ransomware activity. If the “-log” argument is used during ransomware execution, the ransomware creates and encrypts a lock_log.txt file under the C:\ProgramData directory. Encrypting the lock_log.txt file created might be an oversight in the ransomware code possibly indicating that the ransomware is still under development.

Figure 7. Log file created by the ransomware.

Upon successful execution, the ransomware creates ransom notes with the file name readme.txt.

Figure 8. Fog ransom note

Ransom note content:

If you are reading this, then you have been the victim of a cyber attack. We call ourselves Fog and we take responsibility for this incident. You can check out our blog where we post company data:

xbkv2qey6u3g3dqxcoyjnrt4h5sgrhkar6whuo74wo63hijnn677jnyd[.]onion You might appear there if you opt out of our communication.

We are the ones who encrypted your data and also copied some of it to our internal resource. The sooner you contact us, the sooner we can resolve this incident and get you back to work.

To contact us you need to have Tor browser installed:

  1. Follow this link: <url>.onion

  2. Enter the code: <code>

  3. Now we can communicate safely.

    If you are a decision-maker, you will get all the details when you get in touch. We are waiting for you.


Modify Registry

The ransomware did not perform any registry key modification.

Mutex

The mutex is the fundamental tool for managing shared resources between multiple threads or processes. Typically, ransomware uses a mutex to avoid reinfecting the victim system and causing multiple layers of encryption. The ransomware creates the following mutex value: XDLJgan1TkNkWfrQ78xVrust07YDq45X.

Figure 9. Mutex value created while debugging the ransomware


Network Activity

The ransomware did not try to communicate with a remote server other than encrypting data from mounted shares.

Indicators of Compromise

Indicator

Type

Context

B6360765c786ceee0eb28bee64709172b4e2e066449968e011390be1afd8f36c515edfedadb458be0f569fc2bedb6c4139782516d6faf464b4881739e312e9fabbE67260804526323484f564eebeb6c99ed021b960b899ff788aed85bb7a9d75c3e44c342198e0ad8dd8c0f7bda19d4deb33f0d8355e3e78827505c3b858c82d54

SHA256 hash

Fog ransomware

C:\readme.txt

File path

Fog ransom note

.fog, .flocked, .ffog

Extension

Encrypted file extensions

vssadmin delete shadows /all /quiet

Process

Volume Shadow Copy deletion

XDLJgan1TkNkWfrQ78xVrust07YDq45X
JBgB4ZHxUhNdJL9mz61WFXxl0GUXPAXw
Gxu7w1Hj1ojGy99XUbpyG3JuYV0twle2

Mutex

Mutex value objects created by the Fog ransomware

xbkv2qey6u3g3dqxcoyjnrt4h5sgrhkar6whuo74wo63hijnn677jnyd[.]onion

URL

TA data leak site (DLS)


Data Leak Site

The ransom note contains a data leak site (DLS) that, when accessed, displayed the following page, self-identifying the group as Fog:

Figure 10. TOR DLS: xbkv2qey6u3gd3qxcojynrt4h5sgrhkar6whuo74wo63hijnn677jnyd[.]onion


Detection Mechanisms

Custom Detections and Blocking with Arete Bloktd℠

SentinelOne S1QL 1.0 query syntax (STAR rule):

Fog Ransomware

EndpointOS = ″Windows″ AND
( (ObjectType = ″Process″ AND SrcProcCmdLine RegExp ″\\.exe\\s{1,3}\\-id\\s{1,3}[a-zA-Z0-9]
{6}″) OR (ObjectType = ″File″ AND EventType In (″File Creation″, ″File Scan″) AND
TgtFilePath Contains Anycase ″\\

EndpointOS = ″Windows″ AND
( (ObjectType = ″Process″ AND SrcProcCmdLine RegExp ″\\.exe\\s{1,3}\\-id\\s{1,3}[a-zA-Z0-9]
{6}″) OR (ObjectType = ″File″ AND EventType In (″File Creation″, ″File Scan″) AND
TgtFilePath Contains Anycase ″\\

EndpointOS = ″Windows″ AND
( (ObjectType = ″Process″ AND SrcProcCmdLine RegExp ″\\.exe\\s{1,3}\\-id\\s{1,3}[a-zA-Z0-9]
{6}″) OR (ObjectType = ″File″ AND EventType In (″File Creation″, ″File Scan″) AND
TgtFilePath Contains Anycase ″\\

Akira Ransomware




Note: These threat hunting queries may need to be tuned for your specific network environment.


Yara





Recommended Mitigations

  • Utilize an endpoint detection and response (EDR) solution with the capability to halt detected processes and isolate systems on the network based on identified conditions.

  • Block any known attacker C2s in the firewall.

  • Implement multi-factor authentication on RDP and VPN to restrict access to critical network resources.

  • Eliminate unnecessary RDP ports exposed to the internet.

  • Block a high number of SMB connection attempts from one system to others in the network over a short period of time.

  • Perform periodic dark web monitoring to verify if data is available for sale on the black market.

  • Perform penetration tests.

  • Periodically patch systems and update tools.

  • Monitor connections to the network from suspicious locations.

  • Monitor downloads and uploads of files to file-sharing services outside standard work hours.

  • Monitor file uploads from domain controllers to the internet.

  • Monitor network scans from uncommon servers (e.g., RDP server).

Organizations can find the full list of US government-recommended ransomware prevention and mitigation guidance here: https://www.cisa.gov/stopransomware/ransomware-guide.

Arete provides data-driven cybersecurity solutions to transform your response to emerging cyber threats. Learn more.


References


At Arete, we envision a world without cyber extortion, where people, businesses, and governments can thrive. We are taking all that we know from over 8,000 engagements to inform our solutions and strengthen powerful tools to better prevent, detect, and respond to the cyber extortion threats of tomorrow. Our elite team of experts provides unparalleled capabilities to address the entire cyber threat lifecycle, from incident response and restoration to advisory and managed security services. To learn more about our solutions, visit www.areteir.com.

Back to Blog Posts

Article

Ransomware Trends & Data Insights: July 2026

INC Ransom was the most active threat group in July, while activity remained relatively distributed among multiple threat groups, with 19 unique groups observed throughout the month. Alongside INC Ransom, Qilin, Global Secret Group, Anubis, and DragonForce rounded out the five most active threat groups observed in July. Several emerging threat actors were also observed during the month, including Booba Team, Settra, and Global Secret Group.

Figure 1. Activity from the top 3 threat groups in July 2026

 Throughout the month, analysts at Arete identified several trends behind the threat actors perpetrating cybercrime activities:

  • In July 2026, Global Secret Group emerged as a new threat actor, leveraging the leaked LockBit 3.0 (LockBit Black) source code. Although the group began operations in June 2026, it quickly accumulated a substantial number of victims on its data leak site (DLS). The group operates through TOR-based negotiation portals and qTox communications. Notably, its DLS provides step-by-step guidance on purchasing Bitcoin, including references to Coinbase and Binance, demonstrating a streamlined, victim-focused extortion process designed to simplify ransom payments.

  • Similar to Fulcrumsec, the recently emerged Settra ransomware group appears to leverage AI-driven analysis of stolen data, publishing detailed and highly structured victim reports on its DLS. Additionally, a potential EDR-disabling tool, edr_blind.exe, was identified in multiple cases, suggesting a focus on defense-evasion capabilities.

  • With the continuation of the FortiBleed campaign, researchers have now identified compromised FortiGate credentials being leveraged by both the INC and Lynx ransomware operations. Analysis revealed direct operational links between the groups, including shared ransomware infrastructure and overlap between FortiBleed victims and ransomware targets. The operators are also incorporating AI to enhance various stages of the attack lifecycle and increase operational efficiency and scale. Notably, Arete also observed an INC ransomware intrusion leveraging FortiBleed-derived access in July, reinforcing the campaign's role as a precursor to ransomware deployment.

Sources

  • Arete Internal

Podcast

Cyber Campfire: June Threat Trends & Insights

In this episode of Arete’s Cyber Campfire podcast, our Threat Intelligence Team discusses trends, statistics, and emerging threat actors from June 2026. Tune in for firsthand insights on today’s threat landscape that can enhance your approach to cyber risk.

Article

Current: Misconfigured Server Reveals Multiple Phishing Campaigns

Researchers uncovered three Microsoft 365 phishing campaigns after discovering a misconfigured HTTP server that exposed a threat actor’s phishing tools, configurations, victim logs, and operational infrastructure. The investigation revealed two operators using custom Evilginx-based adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing frameworks to steal authentication sessions and bypass MFA protections. A third operator abused Microsoft’s OAuth Device Code flow by tricking victims into completing authentication through Microsoft’s legitimate login process, allowing attackers to obtain valid access and refresh tokens without stealing passwords. The largest campaign compromised at least 218 victims across 12 countries, primarily targeting corporate Microsoft 365 accounts, with refresh tokens enabling persistent access. Researchers also identified the use of remote management tools for maintaining access, AI-assisted development of phishing tooling, and links to broader Phishing-as-a-Service (PhaaS) ecosystems, highlighting how commodity frameworks and automation are lowering the barrier for sophisticated identity-based attacks.

What’s Notable and Unique

  • The campaigns demonstrate the continued shift from traditional credential theft to identity- and token-based compromise, in which attackers target authentication sessions, cookies, and OAuth tokens rather than relying solely on password theft. By obtaining valid authentication artifacts, attackers can access Microsoft 365 environments while bypassing conventional MFA protections.


  • The use of Evilginx-based AiTM frameworks highlights how publicly available phishing tools have evolved into effective MFA-bypass platforms. These frameworks proxy legitimate login pages, capture authenticated sessions, and allow attackers to reuse valid sessions without requiring victims’ credentials again.


  • The OAuth Device Code flow abuse represents a different attack method, in which attackers leverage a legitimate Microsoft authentication mechanism to obtain tokens after victims approve the request. This approach bypasses password theft entirely by abusing trusted authentication workflows.


  • The exposed infrastructure provided insight into attacker operations, including phishing configurations, victim tracking data, remote administration tools, and evidence of AI-assisted development. The findings demonstrate how phishing ecosystems now provide reusable tooling and automation that reduce the technical expertise required to conduct large-scale identity attacks.

Analyst Comments

These Microsoft 365 phishing campaigns demonstrate the ongoing evolution of identity-focused attacks, as adversaries increasingly target authentication sessions, tokens, and legitimate cloud authorization mechanisms to bypass traditional security controls. The combination of AiTM phishing, OAuth abuse, remote management tools, and PhaaS infrastructure enables threat actors to maintain persistent access while blending into legitimate cloud activity.

The growing availability of phishing frameworks and AI-assisted attack development highlights the need for continuous identity security improvements beyond traditional phishing defenses. Arete recommends that organizations strengthen identity monitoring, adopt phishing-resistant MFA where possible, review OAuth application permissions, monitor token activity, and implement conditional access policies to detect and restrict suspicious Microsoft 365 authentication behavior. Security teams should also monitor post-compromise indicators such as abnormal mailbox access, suspicious application consent, unauthorized remote tools, and unusual sign-in activity.

Sources

  • One Misconfigured Server, Three Active Campaigns: Full exposure of three AiTM Phishing Operators

  • Misconfigured Server Reveals Three Evilginx Phishing Operations Targeting Microsoft 365

Podcast

Digital Forensics Meets the Courtroom: Insights on Expert Witness and Cyber-Related Litigation

In this episode of Bytes of Insight, host Vinny Sakore and special guest Dr. Bruce Hartley, Managing Director and Co-Founder of Advisory Services at Arete, discuss the evolving role of digital forensics and expert witness work in cybersecurity litigation. Tune in for firsthand insights on how Arete conducts post-breach investigations, what it takes to undergo cross-examination on the stand, and how emerging threats like AI-driven social engineering and third-party breaches are reshaping the advisory landscape.