EXPLORE

Report

Malware Spotlight: Fog Ransomware

Arete Analysis

Tips

Cybersecurity Trends

Download The Report

Executive Summary

Since April 2024, Arete’s Incident Response (IR) team has responded to multiple engagements attributed to the Fog ransomware group. Engagements attributed to this group have been trending up since mid-June and through July 2024, accounting for nearly 20% of Arete’s ransomware and extortion engagements in July. The Fog ransomware group is especially noteworthy as it is one of the few threat actors specifically targeting one industry: education. Since April, Arete has observed that 70% of Fog victims have been education organizations. This spotlight explores the ransomware group’s observed behavior, background information on the threat actor, and statistics from Incident Response engagements, along with a technical analysis of Fog’s ransomware executable. Finally, we discuss security recommendations to better defend against this evolving cyber threat and mitigate the risk of financial and reputation losses.

Incident Response Data on the Fog Ransomware Group

The information below is based on Fog ransomware incidents investigated by Arete since April 2024. Our IR, Threat Intelligence, and Data Analytics teams work together to analyze key data points during every ransomware engagement and form real-time threat actor (TA) insights.

  • The median initial demand is $220,000.

  • The median ransom payment facilitated is $100,000.

  • 36% of engagements involved data exfiltration, often using tools like MEGAsync and Filezilla.

  • Common initial access vectors include brute force attacks against remote desktop protocol (RDP) and compromised virtual private network (VPN) credentials.

  • Tools observed during investigations include CobaltStrike, Mimikatz, ngrok, WinRAR, AnyDesk, Advanced Port Scanner, and GMER, among others. The group demonstrates distinct skill in evading common anti-malware defenses.

  • The ransom note file name is commonly “readme.txt” and includes a link to a TOR site used for negotiations.

  • The group operates a data leak site (DLS) self-proclaimed as “The Fog Blog.”

Background

Fog ransomware was a prominent newcomer in the second quarter (Q2) of 2024 and demonstrated a noticeable trend of attacking entities in the education sector. Arete engagements involving Fog ransomware more than doubled during July 2024 compared to previous months.

Technical Analysis

Malware analysis revealed that Fog ransomware:

  • Supports multiple command-line arguments.

  • Encrypts files on the system and mounted shares.

  • Adds the following extensions to encrypted files: .fog, .ffog, or .flocked (e.g., file.docx.flocked).

  • Creates a ransom note with the following filename: readme.txt.

  • Self-identifies the group as Fog in the ransom note.

  • References a data leak site in the ransom note that, when accessed, self-identifies the group as Fog.

  • Kills a list of processes and services.

  • Maintains a list of whitelisted files and directories to make sure it will not render the system unusable, preventing recovery when running a decryptor.

  • Attempts to prevent system recovery by deleting the system’s volume shadow copies.

  • Creates a mutex during execution.

  • Creates a log file named DbgLog.sys.Execution Pattern/Arguments

Fog ransomware needs command line arguments to execute and encrypt files in the system. Command line arguments supported:

Command line arguments

Description

-id

Key to decrypt ransomware configuration.

-nomutex

Skip mutex check.

-target

Specific location to encrypt files.

-console

Creates a new console window for output.

-size

File size threshold to encrypt.

-log

Log the ransomware activity.

-procoff

Presently unknown.

-uncoff

Presently unknown.

The ransomware will not execute in the system without the “-id” argument followed by a 6-character value that is unique in each engagement.

Execution of the ransomware to encrypt files:

Fog.exe -id [6-characters]

Example:
Fog.exe -id A9p3RZ

Figure 1. Code in the ransomware to check command line argument “-ID”


The ransomware uses the “-id” argument followed by a 6-character value to decrypt a JSON-based ransomware configuration information at runtime. Decrypted JSON field name and descriptions:

Name
Description

RSAPubKey

Public key used in the file encryption process.

LockedExt

Extension added to encrypted files.

NoteFileName

Ransom note name.

PathStopList

Excludes listed directories.

FileMaskStopList

Excludes listed file extensions.

ShutdownProcesses

Terminates list of processes.

ShutdownServices

Terminates list of services.


Stop Services and Processes

Before file encryption, the ransomware terminates a pre-determined list of processes and services to encrypt as many files as possible.

Process names:

“notepad.exe”, “calc.exe”, “*sql*”

Service names:

“Dhcp”, “Dnscache”, “*sql*”

Code in the ransomware showing this operation:

Figure 2. Process termination decompiled code

Figure 3. Service termination decompiled code


File and Directory Exclusions

The ransomware excludes system-related files and folders, ransomware-related files, and whitelisted extensions during encryption.

Excluded file extensions:

“*.exe”, “*.dll”, “*.lnk”, “*.sys”

Excluded directories:

“tmp”, “winnt”, “Application Data”, “AppData”, “temp”, “thumb”, “$Recycle.Bin”, “System Volume Information”, “Windows”, “Boot”


Inhibit System Recovery

Windows operating systems contain features that can help fix corrupted system files, including shadow copies, which are backups of files created by the Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS). By deleting shadow copies, the ransomware can prevent victims from restoring files from backups, making it more difficult for them to recover their data without paying the ransom.

The ransomware deletes volume shadow copies before file encryption by starting the following process:

cmd.exe /c vssadmin delete shadows /all /quiet

System Network Connections Discovery

Fog ransomware can enumerate network-mounted shares by scanning the network interfaces.

Data Encrypted for Impact

The ransomware initially finds available drives and then loads the files one by one using the Windows API FindFirstFileW and FindNextFileW. The ransomware generates random AES keys to encrypt the files, and after encrypting them, the keys are encrypted using a public RSA key. The resulting key is again encrypted and placed at the end of the file.

Figure 4. Data encryption code

Figure 5. Extension added to the encrypted files

Figure 6. Encrypted AES key appended to encrypted file.

Fog ransomware extensions observed:

“.FOG”, “.FLOCKED”, “.FFOG”

During execution, the ransomware creates a file named DbgLog.sys in the same directory and logs the ransomware activity. If the “-log” argument is used during ransomware execution, the ransomware creates and encrypts a lock_log.txt file under the C:\ProgramData directory. Encrypting the lock_log.txt file created might be an oversight in the ransomware code possibly indicating that the ransomware is still under development.

Figure 7. Log file created by the ransomware.

Upon successful execution, the ransomware creates ransom notes with the file name readme.txt.

Figure 8. Fog ransom note

Ransom note content:

If you are reading this, then you have been the victim of a cyber attack. We call ourselves Fog and we take responsibility for this incident. You can check out our blog where we post company data:

xbkv2qey6u3g3dqxcoyjnrt4h5sgrhkar6whuo74wo63hijnn677jnyd[.]onion You might appear there if you opt out of our communication.

We are the ones who encrypted your data and also copied some of it to our internal resource. The sooner you contact us, the sooner we can resolve this incident and get you back to work.

To contact us you need to have Tor browser installed:

  1. Follow this link: <url>.onion

  2. Enter the code: <code>

  3. Now we can communicate safely.

    If you are a decision-maker, you will get all the details when you get in touch. We are waiting for you.


Modify Registry

The ransomware did not perform any registry key modification.

Mutex

The mutex is the fundamental tool for managing shared resources between multiple threads or processes. Typically, ransomware uses a mutex to avoid reinfecting the victim system and causing multiple layers of encryption. The ransomware creates the following mutex value: XDLJgan1TkNkWfrQ78xVrust07YDq45X.

Figure 9. Mutex value created while debugging the ransomware


Network Activity

The ransomware did not try to communicate with a remote server other than encrypting data from mounted shares.

Indicators of Compromise

Indicator

Type

Context

B6360765c786ceee0eb28bee64709172b4e2e066449968e011390be1afd8f36c515edfedadb458be0f569fc2bedb6c4139782516d6faf464b4881739e312e9fabbE67260804526323484f564eebeb6c99ed021b960b899ff788aed85bb7a9d75c3e44c342198e0ad8dd8c0f7bda19d4deb33f0d8355e3e78827505c3b858c82d54

SHA256 hash

Fog ransomware

C:\readme.txt

File path

Fog ransom note

.fog, .flocked, .ffog

Extension

Encrypted file extensions

vssadmin delete shadows /all /quiet

Process

Volume Shadow Copy deletion

XDLJgan1TkNkWfrQ78xVrust07YDq45X
JBgB4ZHxUhNdJL9mz61WFXxl0GUXPAXw
Gxu7w1Hj1ojGy99XUbpyG3JuYV0twle2

Mutex

Mutex value objects created by the Fog ransomware

xbkv2qey6u3g3dqxcoyjnrt4h5sgrhkar6whuo74wo63hijnn677jnyd[.]onion

URL

TA data leak site (DLS)


Data Leak Site

The ransom note contains a data leak site (DLS) that, when accessed, displayed the following page, self-identifying the group as Fog:

Figure 10. TOR DLS: xbkv2qey6u3gd3qxcojynrt4h5sgrhkar6whuo74wo63hijnn677jnyd[.]onion


Detection Mechanisms

Custom Detections and Blocking with Arete Bloktd℠

SentinelOne S1QL 1.0 query syntax (STAR rule):

Fog Ransomware

EndpointOS = ″Windows″ AND
( (ObjectType = ″Process″ AND SrcProcCmdLine RegExp ″\\.exe\\s{1,3}\\-id\\s{1,3}[a-zA-Z0-9]
{6}″) OR (ObjectType = ″File″ AND EventType In (″File Creation″, ″File Scan″) AND
TgtFilePath Contains Anycase ″\\

EndpointOS = ″Windows″ AND
( (ObjectType = ″Process″ AND SrcProcCmdLine RegExp ″\\.exe\\s{1,3}\\-id\\s{1,3}[a-zA-Z0-9]
{6}″) OR (ObjectType = ″File″ AND EventType In (″File Creation″, ″File Scan″) AND
TgtFilePath Contains Anycase ″\\

EndpointOS = ″Windows″ AND
( (ObjectType = ″Process″ AND SrcProcCmdLine RegExp ″\\.exe\\s{1,3}\\-id\\s{1,3}[a-zA-Z0-9]
{6}″) OR (ObjectType = ″File″ AND EventType In (″File Creation″, ″File Scan″) AND
TgtFilePath Contains Anycase ″\\

Akira Ransomware




Note: These threat hunting queries may need to be tuned for your specific network environment.


Yara





Recommended Mitigations

  • Utilize an endpoint detection and response (EDR) solution with the capability to halt detected processes and isolate systems on the network based on identified conditions.

  • Block any known attacker C2s in the firewall.

  • Implement multi-factor authentication on RDP and VPN to restrict access to critical network resources.

  • Eliminate unnecessary RDP ports exposed to the internet.

  • Block a high number of SMB connection attempts from one system to others in the network over a short period of time.

  • Perform periodic dark web monitoring to verify if data is available for sale on the black market.

  • Perform penetration tests.

  • Periodically patch systems and update tools.

  • Monitor connections to the network from suspicious locations.

  • Monitor downloads and uploads of files to file-sharing services outside standard work hours.

  • Monitor file uploads from domain controllers to the internet.

  • Monitor network scans from uncommon servers (e.g., RDP server).

Organizations can find the full list of US government-recommended ransomware prevention and mitigation guidance here: https://www.cisa.gov/stopransomware/ransomware-guide.

Arete provides data-driven cybersecurity solutions to transform your response to emerging cyber threats. Learn more.


References


At Arete, we envision a world without cyber extortion, where people, businesses, and governments can thrive. We are taking all that we know from over 8,000 engagements to inform our solutions and strengthen powerful tools to better prevent, detect, and respond to the cyber extortion threats of tomorrow. Our elite team of experts provides unparalleled capabilities to address the entire cyber threat lifecycle, from incident response and restoration to advisory and managed security services. To learn more about our solutions, visit www.areteir.com.

Back to Blog Posts

Article

Arete's 2026 Q1 Crimeware Report

Harness Arete’s unique data and expertise on extortion and ransomware to inform your response to the evolving threat landscape.

Article

CMS Vulnerability Leads to ClickFix Campaign

Threat actors compromised at least 700 education and technology websites in a recent ClickFix campaign by exploiting a critical SQL injection flaw (CVE-2026-26980) in the Ghost content management system (CMS). Adversaries combined the vulnerability with the ClickFix social engineering tactic to steal admin keys and inject a malicious JavaScript that delivers a fake Cloudflare or CAPTCHA verification pop-up, tricking victims into copying and pasting a malicious command into their systems.

What’s Notable and Unique

  • Rather than targeting the end user first, this campaign is unique in its initial exploitation of the system, followed by social engineering attempts. This hybrid attack style is likely being leveraged to bypass traditional defenses.

  • This recent campaign also highlights how trusted web properties can be weaponized at scale and coupled with unpatched CMS vulnerabilities. Rather than using the CMS compromise to perpetrate a single attack, threat actors turned it into a supply-chain attack that ultimately affected over 700 trusted websites.

Analyst Comments

As network defenders and their tools enhance threat detection capabilities, adversaries increasingly seek methods to bypass these defenses. By combining vulnerability exploitation, social engineering techniques, and staging for ancillary attacks, this campaign successfully bypassed traditional defenses and inflicted significant impact. Defending against hybrid cyberattacks requires comprehensive security controls beyond simply patching vulnerabilities. Organizations should focus on limiting movement within the environment, detecting abuse of trusted applications, and preventing end-user manipulation.

Sources

  • 700+ education and tech websites hijacked in huge ClickFix malware campaign

  • Under the engineering hood: Why Malwarebytes chose WordPress as its CMS

  • Think before you Click(Fix): Analyzing the ClickFix social engineering technique

  • Ghost CMS Vulnerability Exploited to Infect 700 Sites With ClickFix Malware

Article

Threat Actors Leverage Fake JPEG Files for Initial Access

In a recent campaign, researchers observed threat actors using fake JPEG image files as a delivery mechanism to initiate the deployment of additional malicious components. The false JPEG files are typically distributed via phishing emails or other social engineering-based lures, and are actually PowerShell-based malware that deploys a trojanized version of ConnectWise ScreenConnect to establish and maintain persistence in the compromised environment. 

What’s Notable and Unique

  • This campaign leverages JPEG images as the initial lure, where the images are not merely decoys but part of the infection workflow. Victims are typically led to download or open an image that triggers hidden execution logic or redirects them to a payload-delivery sequence that initiates later stages of the intrusion chain. 

  • The attack chain is designed to blend into legitimate environments, making detection more difficult. Execution typically relies on scripted or native Windows components, often including PowerShell or other living-off-the-land binaries, enabling fileless or near-fileless execution and reducing forensic artifacts on disk.

  • The multistage design ensures that the initial JPEG does not directly contain the full payload but instead triggers retrieval or decryption steps that progressively assemble the final malicious components in memory.

Analyst Comments

This campaign illustrates how threat actors continue to blur the line between legitimate file handling and malicious execution chains, indicating potential overlap with remote management or administrative tooling. The use of JPEG-based staging combined with script-based execution reflects a broader evolution toward a stealth-first intrusion design, in which file formats serve as triggers rather than payload containers.

Sources

  • OPERATION SILENTCANVAS : JPEG BASED MULTISTAGE POWERSHELL INTRUSION

Podcast

Cyber Risk and Insurance for Law Firms

In this episode of Bytes of Insight, host Vinny Sakore is joined by Laura Zaroski, Managing Director of the Law Firms Group at Gallagher, as they discuss the evolution of cyber risk for law firms. Tune in for firsthand insights on how to select the right cyber policy, the incident response process, and the nuances of ransom payments and sensitive data.