Article
Microsoft Exchange Server Zero Day Hack Insight
Arete Analysis

On March 2, 2021, Microsoft disclosed and provided security updates for four [4] critical vulnerabilities — CVE-2021-26855, CVE-2021-26857, CVE-2021-26858, and CVE-2021-27065 — impacting on-premises Microsoft Exchange Servers.
While Internet-facing Exchange Servers, such as Outlook Web Access systems, are at particular risk — and especially those at organizations without a dedicated Exchange Server administrator — Microsoft says the vulnerabilities do not impact Office 365/Exchange online mailboxes.
The Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center (MSTIC) attributes the activity to HAFNIUM, a Chinese state-sponsored threat group. Chinese state-sponsored threat actors historically target government agencies, higher-education institutions, law firms, defense contractors, policy think tanks, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and most recently, infectious disease researchers.
IMMEDIATE ACTION: If you have not done so already, review the Microsoft advisories and apply patches to protect vulnerable systems.

Arete Contextual Insights
State-sponsored threat groups, such as HAFNIUM, have the time, skills, and resources to manufacture these potent vulnerability exploits. They are not, however, the only bad actors wielding these techniques.
Beyond what Chinese state-sponsored operations have perpetrated, Arete expects broad impact in high orders of magnitude across multiple industry verticals.
Since the disclosure, multiple security researchers have been analyzing the Exchange
vulnerability patches. Arete can assert that cybercriminals and other state-sponsored actors are doing the same, most likely racing against patch cycles.The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and other high-fidelity sources estimate that tens of thousands of organizations are likely compromised. Via research channels, Arete is aware that one high-fidelity source provided Information Sharing and Analysis Centers (ISACs) with a list of approximately 12,000 organizations for victim notification.
Leveraging Microsoft resources, Arete has identified multiple impacted clients and is currently responding to exploitations across a broad variety of organizations from a variety of cybercrime actors deploying payloads, including, but not limited to, cryptomining malware and ransomware.
Follow-On Actions
Assess systems to validate compromise and analyze impact. Rapid identification and triage
analysis through deployment of SentinelOne and data collection scripts across the impacted Exchange Server(s) to identify malicious activity.
Implement protective measures to harden environments. Based on findings, deploy SentinelOne throughout the remainder of the environment to identify all instances of lateral movement, search for indicators of compromise (IOC’s), and provide insight into the current state of systems health throughout the environment.
Additional Defense Services Available
Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service combines cutting-edge machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies with insights from Arete cyber professionals to provide 24/7 monitoring, reporting, and defense against threats.
Cyber Strategy and Defense. Arete performs current-state testing to assess clients’ cyber hygiene and create a prioritized action plan that closes identified security gaps, strengthens existing infrastructure, and formalizes people, processes, and technologies into a robust cybersecurity program.
Cloud Advisory and Architecture Services. Arete helps clients navigate the shared responsibility model, advising on cloud architectures based on economics, business use, and security.
Back to Blog Posts
Article
Arete's 2026 Q1 Crimeware Report
Harness Arete’s unique data and expertise on extortion and ransomware to inform your response to the evolving threat landscape.
Article
CMS Vulnerability Leads to ClickFix Campaign
Threat actors compromised at least 700 education and technology websites in a recent ClickFix campaign by exploiting a critical SQL injection flaw (CVE-2026-26980) in the Ghost content management system (CMS). Adversaries combined the vulnerability with the ClickFix social engineering tactic to steal admin keys and inject a malicious JavaScript that delivers a fake Cloudflare or CAPTCHA verification pop-up, tricking victims into copying and pasting a malicious command into their systems.
What’s Notable and Unique
Rather than targeting the end user first, this campaign is unique in its initial exploitation of the system, followed by social engineering attempts. This hybrid attack style is likely being leveraged to bypass traditional defenses.
This recent campaign also highlights how trusted web properties can be weaponized at scale and coupled with unpatched CMS vulnerabilities. Rather than using the CMS compromise to perpetrate a single attack, threat actors turned it into a supply-chain attack that ultimately affected over 700 trusted websites.
Analyst Comments
As network defenders and their tools enhance threat detection capabilities, adversaries increasingly seek methods to bypass these defenses. By combining vulnerability exploitation, social engineering techniques, and staging for ancillary attacks, this campaign successfully bypassed traditional defenses and inflicted significant impact. Defending against hybrid cyberattacks requires comprehensive security controls beyond simply patching vulnerabilities. Organizations should focus on limiting movement within the environment, detecting abuse of trusted applications, and preventing end-user manipulation.
Sources
700+ education and tech websites hijacked in huge ClickFix malware campaign
Under the engineering hood: Why Malwarebytes chose WordPress as its CMS
Think before you Click(Fix): Analyzing the ClickFix social engineering technique
Ghost CMS Vulnerability Exploited to Infect 700 Sites With ClickFix Malware
Article
Threat Actors Leverage Fake JPEG Files for Initial Access
In a recent campaign, researchers observed threat actors using fake JPEG image files as a delivery mechanism to initiate the deployment of additional malicious components. The false JPEG files are typically distributed via phishing emails or other social engineering-based lures, and are actually PowerShell-based malware that deploys a trojanized version of ConnectWise ScreenConnect to establish and maintain persistence in the compromised environment.
What’s Notable and Unique
This campaign leverages JPEG images as the initial lure, where the images are not merely decoys but part of the infection workflow. Victims are typically led to download or open an image that triggers hidden execution logic or redirects them to a payload-delivery sequence that initiates later stages of the intrusion chain.
The attack chain is designed to blend into legitimate environments, making detection more difficult. Execution typically relies on scripted or native Windows components, often including PowerShell or other living-off-the-land binaries, enabling fileless or near-fileless execution and reducing forensic artifacts on disk.
The multistage design ensures that the initial JPEG does not directly contain the full payload but instead triggers retrieval or decryption steps that progressively assemble the final malicious components in memory.
Analyst Comments
This campaign illustrates how threat actors continue to blur the line between legitimate file handling and malicious execution chains, indicating potential overlap with remote management or administrative tooling. The use of JPEG-based staging combined with script-based execution reflects a broader evolution toward a stealth-first intrusion design, in which file formats serve as triggers rather than payload containers.
Sources
OPERATION SILENTCANVAS : JPEG BASED MULTISTAGE POWERSHELL INTRUSION
Podcast
Cyber Risk and Insurance for Law Firms
In this episode of Bytes of Insight, host Vinny Sakore is joined by Laura Zaroski, Managing Director of the Law Firms Group at Gallagher, as they discuss the evolution of cyber risk for law firms. Tune in for firsthand insights on how to select the right cyber policy, the incident response process, and the nuances of ransom payments and sensitive data.



