Article
New Group Emerges with Similarities to ALPHV/BlackCat
Threat Actors
Arete Analysis

A new Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) group calling themselves Cicada3301 emerged in early June 2024 and has been using recruitment posts in dark web forums to attract new affiliates. As with many of the current active RaaS organizations, Cicada3301 uses double extortion, encrypting victim systems and stealing sensitive data. They have a data leak site (DLS) on the dark web where they have been posting victims since mid-June. The group has been observed encrypting Linux/VMware ESXi in addition to Windows operating systems.
Similarities with ALPHV/BlackCat
A recent analysis of Cicada3301’s ransomware conducted by cyber researchers discovered several significant code overlaps with the ransomware used by ALPHV, the prolific threat group who was targeted by law enforcement earlier this year and subsequently shut down their RaaS. According to researchers from Truesec, Cicada3301 and ALPHV ransomware similarities include:
Written in Rust programming language
Use the ChaCha20 algorithm for encryption
Use almost identical commands to shutdown VM and remove snapshots
Use the same command parameters to provide a graphic output on encryption
Use intermittent encryptions on files larger than 100MB
Use a similar naming convention for the ransom note file and the same key parameter used to decrypt the ransomware note
In addition to the code overlaps, Arete has also observed similarities in the format and design of the Tor chats Cicada3301 uses to communicate ransom payments to its victims. Like the Tor chats ALPHV used, Cicada3301’s has a similar layout, with certain words bolded in the instructions, a countdown timer, two prices listed based on whether the victim pays within the time limit posted, and payments are accepted in both Bitcoin and Monero.

Figure 1. Screenshot of TOR chat used by Cicada3301 (source: Arete)

Figure 2. Screenshot of TOR chat used by ALPHV (source: bleepingcomputer.com)
Will the Real Cicada Please Stand Up?
This new ransomware group also appears to have taken their name from Cicada 3301, which was an unknown group who posted elaborate puzzles on the internet between 2012 and 2014. Solving the puzzles required knowledge of computer science and data security concepts such as coding, cryptography, and encryption. The last puzzle posted by the group was in early 2014 and has still not been solved. Although the purpose of the puzzles, and individuals who created them remains a mystery, there is no indication that this current ransomware group has any association with the original Cicada 3301. This wouldn’t be the first time a threat actor has used the name, as an unrelated group of hackers operating in 2015 also called themselves 3301.
Analyst Comments
At this time, it is too early to assess whether the similarities between the two groups are coincidental, or if there is a connection in the form of a rebranding of ALPHV, a new group working with former developers from ALPHV, or if ALPHV’s ransomware code was sold after the RaaS shut down its operations earlier this year. Following ALPHV’s exit scam and departure from the ransomware landscape, it was assumed members of the RaaS would rebrand or re-affiliate with other threat groups, so any of these connections are plausible. However, with 24 victims already posted to its DLS in less than three months, Cicada3301 already appears to be an emerging threat in the near-term, regardless of who is ultimately behind the new RaaS.
Sources
Back to Blog Posts
Article
Phishing-as-a-Service Evolves with Venom
“Whaling” has taken on a new meaning with a highly targeted phishing campaign active from November 2025 through March 2026, aimed exclusively at senior executives from more than 20 industries. The campaign, dubbed VENOM, is a phishing-as-a-service (PhaaS) platform that combines advanced evasion capabilities with immediate persistence of targeted executives. The initial phish impersonates an internal SharePoint document notification and uses embedded QR codes to convince victims to shift to unmanaged mobile devices to bypass corporate security controls. VENOM aims to establish persistence immediately by either registering a new MFA device or retaining long-lived refresh tokens, allowing threat actors to maintain access even after password resets or other base-level remediation efforts.
What’s Notable and Unique
This campaign is unique in its targeted nature of the PhaaS platform rather than broad, sweeping attempts. The threat actors behind VENOM create convincing phishing emails that impersonate SharePoint activity using the victim’s own domain, company name, and even fabricated email threads. These convincing social engineering tactics, combined with the specific targeting of executives, make this an effective capability for cybercriminals.
VENOM operates as a closed-access system, with full adversarial support, but has no public visibility on the dark web or from security researchers. The service likely operates on an invite-only basis, unlike most PhaaS platforms, which typically seek to have as many paying customers as possible. This, among other items such as the sophisticated evasion techniques, indicates a higher degree of sophistication than most other PhaaS offerings.
Either through MFA enrollment or Microsoft Device Code abuse, the threat actor forces the victim to aid them in establishing persistence early in the attack lifecycle. These tactics result in either valid tokens or an additional MFA login method controlled by the threat actor, meaning typical password resets alone are not effective against this technique. Administrators would be required to explicitly revoke sessions and token grants to mitigate the threat actors’ persistence.
Analyst Comments
Oftentimes, MFA is viewed as a one-stop shop to cybersecurity, but tactics such as this show how threat actors can bypass MFA, or worse, use it to establish persistence. Ultimately, this campaign highlights how modern attacks increasingly abuse legitimate authentication workflows rather than attempting to defeat them outright. Defenses that rely solely on MFA without other security posturing, such as continuous session monitoring, token revocation, and identity logging, can leave organizations vulnerable. As attackers shift toward token theft and device trust abuse, incident response and identity security strategies must evolve accordingly.
Sources
Meet VENOM: The PhaaS Platform That Neutralizes MFA
Article
Threat Actors Continue to Leverage BYOVD Technique
Multiple ransomware operations have recently been observed leveraging the Bring Your Own Vulnerable Driver (BYOVD) technique to disable endpoint security controls prior to ransomware deployment. Notably, the Qilin ransomware group commonly leverages a malicious msimg32.dll file loaded via DLL side-loading, along with vulnerable drivers including rwdrv.sys and hlpdrv.sys, to gain kernel-level access and disable security processes. Similarly, Warlock ransomware has been observed exploiting the vulnerable NSecKrnl.sys driver to bypass security controls. The use of BYOVD has also been observed across ransomware campaigns associated with Akira, INC, Medusa, and other threat actors.
What’s Notable and Unique
The Qilin ransomware group employs a sophisticated multi-stage infection chain, leveraging DLL side-loading (msimg32.dll) to execute malicious payloads directly in memory and evade traditional file-based detection. In DLL side-loading, a threat actor tricks a program into loading a malicious dynamic link library. The malware escalates privileges and uses signed but vulnerable drivers (rwdrv.sys and hlpdrv.sys) to bypass security controls, access system memory, and systematically disable endpoint defenses by terminating security processes and disabling monitoring callbacks at the kernel level.
Akira ransomware operators have also exploited the rwdrv.sys and hlpdrv.sys drivers. Additionally, Arete has observed threat actors leveraging multiple other drivers, including the vulnerable TrueSight.sys, to bypass security controls.
Meanwhile, Warlock ransomware operators disguised malicious activity by renaming rclone.exe to TrendSecurity.exe to appear legitimate. The file functioned as a loader, exploiting the vulnerable NSecKrnl.sys driver to disable security processes, while Group Policy Objects (GPOs) were leveraged to systematically disable security controls across the environment.
Analyst Comments
The BYOVD technique, employed by multiple known ransomware operators, reflects a broader shift toward pre-encryption defense evasion, including suppression of Windows telemetry, removal of monitoring callbacks, and abuse of legitimately signed but vulnerable drivers. This technique enables threat actors to evade detection, maintain persistence for extended periods, and maximize the operational impact of ransomware deployment across compromised environments. Organizations should implement strict driver control policies, such as Microsoft’s Vulnerable Driver Blocklist and application control mechanisms. Additionally, enforcing least privilege access, enabling multi-factor authentication (MFA), maintaining up-to-date patching, and continuously monitoring for anomalous driver and kernel-level activity can further reduce the risk of such attacks.
Sources
Qilin EDR killer infection chain
Web Shells, Tunnels, and Ransomware: Dissecting a Warlock Attack
Article
Ransomware Trends & Data Insights: March 2026
The threat landscape in March had a much more even distribution of threat groups than has been observed since the first half of 2025. Although Akira, Qilin, Play, and INC remained among the most active groups, Arete observed 21 unique ransomware and extortion groups in March, compared to only 15 in February. Akira and Qilin’s activity also declined from the previous month; in February, the two groups were responsible for almost half of all ransomware incidents, but in March they only comprised a little more than a quarter of all activity. Arete also observed activity from several emerging groups in the past month, including BravoX, NightSpire, Payouts King, and Securotrop.

Figure 1. Activity from the top 5 threat groups in March 2026
Analysts at Arete identified several trends behind the threat actors perpetrating cybercrime activities:
In March, threat actors actively exploited FortiGate Next-Generation Firewall appliances as initial access vectors to compromise enterprise networks. The activity involves the exploitation of recently disclosed security vulnerabilities, including CVE-2025-59718, CVE-2025-59719, and CVE-2026-24858, or weak credentials, allowing attackers to gain administrative access, extract configuration files, and obtain service account credentials. Arete also observed Fortinet device exploitation involving various threat groups, with the Qilin ransomware group notably leveraging Fortinet device exploits.
Phishing campaigns leveraging OAuth redirection and a resurgence of Microsoft Teams–based social engineering were also observed in March. In one campaign, attackers sent emails disguised as Microsoft Teams recordings or Microsoft 365 alerts, redirecting victims through legitimate OAuth endpoints to attacker-controlled pages hosting malicious ZIP payloads. A separate campaign has been ongoing since last year, in which attackers flood users’ inboxes with spam and impersonate IT support personnel to trick victims into initiating remote support sessions via tools like Quick Assist.
Arete recently released its 2025 Annual Crimeware Report. Leveraging data and intelligence collected during ransomware and extortion incident response engagements, this report highlights notable trends and shifts in the threat landscape throughout 2025, including Akira’s unusually high activity levels in the second half of 2025, evolving social engineering techniques, and trends in ransom demands and impacted industries.
Sources
Arete Internal
Report
Arete's 2025 Annual Crimeware Report
Harness Arete’s unique data and expertise on extortion and ransomware to inform your response to the evolving threat landscape.



