EXPLORE

Article

New Group Emerges with Similarities to ALPHV/BlackCat

Threat Actors

Arete Analysis

A new Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) group calling themselves Cicada3301 emerged in early June 2024 and has been using recruitment posts in dark web forums to attract new affiliates. As with many of the current active RaaS organizations, Cicada3301 uses double extortion, encrypting victim systems and stealing sensitive data. They have a data leak site (DLS) on the dark web where they have been posting victims since mid-June. The group has been observed encrypting Linux/VMware ESXi in addition to Windows operating systems.

Similarities with ALPHV/BlackCat

A recent analysis of Cicada3301’s ransomware conducted by cyber researchers discovered several significant code overlaps with the ransomware used by ALPHV, the prolific threat group who was targeted by law enforcement earlier this year and subsequently shut down their RaaS. According to researchers from Truesec, Cicada3301 and ALPHV ransomware similarities include:

  • Written in Rust programming language

  • Use the ChaCha20 algorithm for encryption

  • Use almost identical commands to shutdown VM and remove snapshots

  • Use the same command parameters to provide a graphic output on encryption

  • Use intermittent encryptions on files larger than 100MB

  • Use a similar naming convention for the ransom note file and the same key parameter used to decrypt the ransomware note

In addition to the code overlaps, Arete has also observed similarities in the format and design of the Tor chats Cicada3301 uses to communicate ransom payments to its victims. Like the Tor chats ALPHV used, Cicada3301’s has a similar layout, with certain words bolded in the instructions, a countdown timer, two prices listed based on whether the victim pays within the time limit posted, and payments are accepted in both Bitcoin and Monero.

Figure 1. Screenshot of TOR chat used by Cicada3301 (source: Arete)

Figure 2. Screenshot of TOR chat used by ALPHV (source: bleepingcomputer.com)

Will the Real Cicada Please Stand Up?

This new ransomware group also appears to have taken their name from Cicada 3301, which was an unknown group who posted elaborate puzzles on the internet between 2012 and 2014. Solving the puzzles required knowledge of computer science and data security concepts such as coding, cryptography, and encryption. The last puzzle posted by the group was in early 2014 and has still not been solved. Although the purpose of the puzzles, and individuals who created them remains a mystery, there is no indication that this current ransomware group has any association with the original Cicada 3301. This wouldn’t be the first time a threat actor has used the name, as an unrelated group of hackers operating in 2015 also called themselves 3301.

Analyst Comments

At this time, it is too early to assess whether the similarities between the two groups are coincidental, or if there is a connection in the form of a rebranding of ALPHV, a new group working with former developers from ALPHV, or if ALPHV’s ransomware code was sold after the RaaS shut down its operations earlier this year. Following ALPHV’s exit scam and departure from the ransomware landscape, it was assumed members of the RaaS would rebrand or re-affiliate with other threat groups, so any of these connections are plausible. However, with 24 victims already posted to its DLS in less than three months, Cicada3301 already appears to be an emerging threat in the near-term, regardless of who is ultimately behind the new RaaS.

Sources

Back to Blog Posts

Article

Ransomware Trends & Data Insights: July 2026

INC Ransom was the most active threat group in July, while activity remained relatively distributed among multiple threat groups, with 19 unique groups observed throughout the month. Alongside INC Ransom, Qilin, Global Secret Group, Anubis, and DragonForce rounded out the five most active threat groups observed in July. Several emerging threat actors were also observed during the month, including Booba Team, Settra, and Global Secret Group.

Figure 1. Activity from the top 3 threat groups in July 2026

 Throughout the month, analysts at Arete identified several trends behind the threat actors perpetrating cybercrime activities:

  • In July 2026, Global Secret Group emerged as a new threat actor, leveraging the leaked LockBit 3.0 (LockBit Black) source code. Although the group began operations in June 2026, it quickly accumulated a substantial number of victims on its data leak site (DLS). The group operates through TOR-based negotiation portals and qTox communications. Notably, its DLS provides step-by-step guidance on purchasing Bitcoin, including references to Coinbase and Binance, demonstrating a streamlined, victim-focused extortion process designed to simplify ransom payments.

  • Similar to Fulcrumsec, the recently emerged Settra ransomware group appears to leverage AI-driven analysis of stolen data, publishing detailed and highly structured victim reports on its DLS. Additionally, a potential EDR-disabling tool, edr_blind.exe, was identified in multiple cases, suggesting a focus on defense-evasion capabilities.

  • With the continuation of the FortiBleed campaign, researchers have now identified compromised FortiGate credentials being leveraged by both the INC and Lynx ransomware operations. Analysis revealed direct operational links between the groups, including shared ransomware infrastructure and overlap between FortiBleed victims and ransomware targets. The operators are also incorporating AI to enhance various stages of the attack lifecycle and increase operational efficiency and scale. Notably, Arete also observed an INC ransomware intrusion leveraging FortiBleed-derived access in July, reinforcing the campaign's role as a precursor to ransomware deployment.

Sources

  • Arete Internal

Podcast

Cyber Campfire: June Threat Trends & Insights

In this episode of Arete’s Cyber Campfire podcast, our Threat Intelligence Team discusses trends, statistics, and emerging threat actors from June 2026. Tune in for firsthand insights on today’s threat landscape that can enhance your approach to cyber risk.

Article

Current: Misconfigured Server Reveals Multiple Phishing Campaigns

Researchers uncovered three Microsoft 365 phishing campaigns after discovering a misconfigured HTTP server that exposed a threat actor’s phishing tools, configurations, victim logs, and operational infrastructure. The investigation revealed two operators using custom Evilginx-based adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing frameworks to steal authentication sessions and bypass MFA protections. A third operator abused Microsoft’s OAuth Device Code flow by tricking victims into completing authentication through Microsoft’s legitimate login process, allowing attackers to obtain valid access and refresh tokens without stealing passwords. The largest campaign compromised at least 218 victims across 12 countries, primarily targeting corporate Microsoft 365 accounts, with refresh tokens enabling persistent access. Researchers also identified the use of remote management tools for maintaining access, AI-assisted development of phishing tooling, and links to broader Phishing-as-a-Service (PhaaS) ecosystems, highlighting how commodity frameworks and automation are lowering the barrier for sophisticated identity-based attacks.

What’s Notable and Unique

  • The campaigns demonstrate the continued shift from traditional credential theft to identity- and token-based compromise, in which attackers target authentication sessions, cookies, and OAuth tokens rather than relying solely on password theft. By obtaining valid authentication artifacts, attackers can access Microsoft 365 environments while bypassing conventional MFA protections.


  • The use of Evilginx-based AiTM frameworks highlights how publicly available phishing tools have evolved into effective MFA-bypass platforms. These frameworks proxy legitimate login pages, capture authenticated sessions, and allow attackers to reuse valid sessions without requiring victims’ credentials again.


  • The OAuth Device Code flow abuse represents a different attack method, in which attackers leverage a legitimate Microsoft authentication mechanism to obtain tokens after victims approve the request. This approach bypasses password theft entirely by abusing trusted authentication workflows.


  • The exposed infrastructure provided insight into attacker operations, including phishing configurations, victim tracking data, remote administration tools, and evidence of AI-assisted development. The findings demonstrate how phishing ecosystems now provide reusable tooling and automation that reduce the technical expertise required to conduct large-scale identity attacks.

Analyst Comments

These Microsoft 365 phishing campaigns demonstrate the ongoing evolution of identity-focused attacks, as adversaries increasingly target authentication sessions, tokens, and legitimate cloud authorization mechanisms to bypass traditional security controls. The combination of AiTM phishing, OAuth abuse, remote management tools, and PhaaS infrastructure enables threat actors to maintain persistent access while blending into legitimate cloud activity.

The growing availability of phishing frameworks and AI-assisted attack development highlights the need for continuous identity security improvements beyond traditional phishing defenses. Arete recommends that organizations strengthen identity monitoring, adopt phishing-resistant MFA where possible, review OAuth application permissions, monitor token activity, and implement conditional access policies to detect and restrict suspicious Microsoft 365 authentication behavior. Security teams should also monitor post-compromise indicators such as abnormal mailbox access, suspicious application consent, unauthorized remote tools, and unusual sign-in activity.

Sources

  • One Misconfigured Server, Three Active Campaigns: Full exposure of three AiTM Phishing Operators

  • Misconfigured Server Reveals Three Evilginx Phishing Operations Targeting Microsoft 365

Podcast

Digital Forensics Meets the Courtroom: Insights on Expert Witness and Cyber-Related Litigation

In this episode of Bytes of Insight, host Vinny Sakore and special guest Dr. Bruce Hartley, Managing Director and Co-Founder of Advisory Services at Arete, discuss the evolving role of digital forensics and expert witness work in cybersecurity litigation. Tune in for firsthand insights on how Arete conducts post-breach investigations, what it takes to undergo cross-examination on the stand, and how emerging threats like AI-driven social engineering and third-party breaches are reshaping the advisory landscape.