EXPLORE

Article

Remote Access and IoT Search Engines

Arete Analysis

Recently, Arete Incident Response Tiger Teams (“Arete IR”) have responded to an increased volume of ransomware incidents involving the Sodinikibi, Phobos, and Dharma ransomware variants. The threat actors deploying these variants are known to use anti-forensics techniques to hide their tracks. Once access is gained, they usually delete artifacts which aid cyber investigators with reconstructing steps taken by the threat actors, revealing important information pertaining to the root cause for the computer security event. In most cases, Arete was able to recover critical artifacts to forensically reconstruct the various attacks to identify a single entry point consistent across the three variants: Remote Desktop.

Requirements Businesses have a need to enable workers to access files and business resources remotely from home, hotels, or business relationships. The cheapest way for businesses to allow remote access is to “expose” the Remote Desktop Protocol (“RDP”) to the public internet. The business’ firewall configuration is altered to allow inbound connectivity to the default port 3389, and any connections to that port are automatically forwarded to a specific computer on the network, which is usually a terminal services server. Using only an Internet Protocol (“IP”) address, anyone can attempt to connect to the RDP service.

Limitations on Protocol and Service Most businesses who implement remote access via RDP aren’t aware of the limitations of the service nor do they implement intrusion detection and prevention services. Lastly, many don’t require multi-factor authentication. The downside to allowing any connection into a network is exactly that: any connection can be allowed into the network. This connection can be from anywhere, at any time, for any reason and with any number of authentication attempts. The RDP service itself doesn’t monitor for bad credential combinations and automatically disable or block connection attempts. Port forwarding on firewalls doesn’t inspect the inbound traffic either. Essentially, once a port is exposed to the public internet, anyone, anywhere, can try an unlimited number of usernames and passwords to gain access to that system. Since any number of combinations can be attempted, this makes the configuration vulnerable to credential stuffing, dictionary, and brute force attacks.

Crime of Opportunity Quite often during our investigations, clients ask “was this a targeted attack or a crime of opportunity?” Nine out of 10 times, it’s a crime of opportunity. Then the follow up question “Why us?” Well, for starters, it’s your configuration. These threat actors have their attack mechanics down to a series of steps: 1. Identify target 2. Gain access to target 3. Cover tracks 4. Deploy ransomware 5. Repeat

While they most likely aren’t outright targeting your organization directly, they may be targeting exposed services which link them to your organization.

Internet of Things (IoT) Search Engines

Google, Bing, and DuckDuckGo are three very popular search engines. They’re used to find all sorts of text information or images. These search engines aren’t designed to identify specific computers or services across the world. Rather a different set of search engines can be used to find computers that are connected directly to the internet along with their IP addresses and any other information about the computer involving their geo location, running services, and protocol history. Use caution when visiting these sites as unintended side effects can occur.

  1. https://shodan.io

  2. https://censys.io

  3. https://zoomeye.org

These sites can be used by anyone, anonymously, to identify internet attached devices, the services they’re running and any other information the IoT crawlers can index. The anonymous feature is obtained via the IoT indexer by allowing anyone to query the index stored by the IoT search engine, instead of scanning the node directly. Essentially, this search engine is the phone book, allowing anyone to find street addresses by person’s names or people by street addresses.

A search for “port:3389”, which is the default port for RDP services, can return several million devices. Again, this isn’t real time information because the query is run against the index of the IoT search engine. Once an IP address is identified, additional steps would be needed to test if the IP address is online. Additionally, the resulting information can be filtered by organization, operating system, and country.

Reviewing the results, there’s approximately 1,060 IP addresses that are detected as the Windows 2003 operating system. At face value, this is extremely alarming because Windows 2003 was discontinued during July of 2015. Microsoft officially stopped supporting the operating system as well as providing security updates. Given the information returned from shodan.io, businesses are still relying on it as a means for remote connectivity. Again, these results would need to be qualified as online and available. Regardless, the number is still alarming.

Attack Methodologies

After the threat actor identifies a target, any number of steps can be performed to initiate an attack. Typically, the threat actor will profile the target to gain as much information as possible in order to increase the success of the attack. Profiling can occur in any of the following ways:

  1. Verifying the IP address is online and attempting to brute force access automatically.

  2. Attempting to resolve the IP address to a domain name or company name in order to:

  3. Construct phishing emails for obtaining credentials.

  4. Employ social engineering of employees for obtaining credentials

  5. Research running services against known vulnerabilities to identify pre-built payloads to exploit the services.

Whichever approach the threat actor takes, there’s a good chance they will be successful with gaining unauthorized access to your network.

Preventative Actions

While it’s a waiting game to become the next victim, there are steps you can take to mitigate or prolong falling prey to these threat actor methodologies. Successful mitigation of unauthorized access can be achieved through the proper implementation of layered computer and network security controls. The following steps, while not exhaustive, can be taken to mitigate the exposure of services used by your organization.

  1. Enable Multi-Factor Authentication (“MFA”) on any third party accounts or remote access on any third party accounts or remote access accounts. accounts.

  2. Disable RDP services and port forwarding on firewalls.

  3. Implement VPN services to remotely connect to your organization’s network or leverage to your organization’s network or leverage remote

  4. connection technologies that remote connection technologies that support MFA. support MFA.

  5. Research open source intelligence to develop a public footprint of your organization. a public footprint of your organization.

  6. Train employees on social engineering and phishing email tactics and techniques. phishing email tactics and techniques.

  7. Purchase a cyber insurance policy and familiarize yourself with the preferred vendors yourself with the preferred vendors within your policy. within your policy.

  8. Build a close working relationship with a cyber advisory company.

Back to Blog Posts

Article

Top 9 Security Controls for SMBs

In today’s complex cyber threat landscape, small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) should implement a layered, multi-pronged approach to security. Here are some proven, effective controls to consider:

1.        Implement MFA for All Users
Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is an effective and accessible way to protect sensitive data, comply with regulatory standards, and prevent unauthorized access to critical systems. By ensuring that users not only use a password but also a secure token, an organization can significantly reduce phishing attempts, credential stuffing attacks, and ransomware incidents. MFA should be enabled for email, VPN, and critical system access.

2.        Update Patch Management Programs
A modern patching program should include policies and mechanisms to manage software updates in a timely manner. Patching efforts should address not just operating system updates, but also commonly utilized software within the environment. An active patching plan aims to reduce the mean time to patch and provide metrics on existing patch efforts. In the event of a high-severity vulnerability, a mature patching program should also be able to identify the risks and exposure for a given set of systems based on the average time to patch. This helps stakeholders make informed decisions when a new exploit is released.

3.        Leverage a Properly Managed Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Tool
With real-time threat detection and advanced visibility, endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions can enhance an organization’s ability to detect and investigate potential malicious activity, including ransomware, lateral movement, fileless attacks, and more. Effective management of EDR should include proper configuration, regular agent updates, and established procedures for responding to alerts.

4.        Enhance EDR with Frontline Incident Intelligence
While EDR solutions are an important component of a security program, threat actors are continually adapting their techniques to evade detection, and as a result, standard detection methods may not always identify emerging threats or novel attack behaviors. To strengthen protection, organizations can supplement EDR tools with custom detection rules informed by incident response data. These rules can help identify indicators of compromise observed during cyber incidents, providing an additional layer of visibility beyond traditional detections.

Arete Bloktd℠ illustrates this approach by transforming threat intelligence and malware analysis into curated detection rules for EDR tools. Applying frontline intelligence to security tools can result in earlier detection, less investigative burden, and a more confident response. 

5.        Create and Continuously Test an Incident Response (IR) Plan
An incident response plan can help an organization effectively identify, respond to, and recover from a cybersecurity incident while minimizing disruption and downtime. An IR plan defines clear roles, escalation paths, communication strategies, and decision frameworks for both internal and external teams. To be effective, these plans should be regularly tested with post-incident reviews or tabletop exercises involving key stakeholders.

6.        Maintain Encrypted and Tested Data Backups
In the case of a cyberattack, backups can help organizations maintain business continuity, support ransom negotiations with threat actors, and contribute to a timely and successful recovery. Encrypting backups makes it more difficult for threat actors to access or alter them, and regular testing ensures they remain accessible during a security incident.

7.        Conduct Employee Security Awareness Training
Human error is a leading cause of cybersecurity incidents, and an organization’s employees are its first line of defense against cyber threats. Security awareness training reinforces the importance of data confidentiality, supports regulatory compliance, and helps employees recognize and understand red flags such as suspicious emails, malicious links, and social engineering attempts.

8.        Assess and Address Existing Risk and Vulnerabilities
To maintain a proactive approach to risk management and improve resilience, organizations should regularly assess existing vulnerabilities through expert-led Vulnerability Assessments, Penetration Testing, and Threat Hunting Assessments. These exercises can help identify security gaps, support regulatory compliance, and prevent potential incidents. During remediation, prioritize high-impact vulnerabilities and make a plan for periodic assessments.

9.        Apply Least-Privilege Access Controls
Employees should have access only to the systems, applications, and data necessary to perform their jobs. By removing unnecessary administrative privileges and regularly reviewing user permissions, organizations can reduce the risk of unauthorized access and limit the damage caused by compromised accounts or insider threats.

Organizations should regularly review their cybersecurity programs, stay informed about emerging threats, and evaluate whether their security controls are adapting to the evolving threat landscape.

Article

Ransomware Trends & Data Insights: August 2026

Although INC Ransom was the most active ransomware threat group observed in August 2026, overall activity remained relatively distributed across the threat landscape, with approximately 30 unique ransomware and extortion groups, including both established and newly emerged actors, observed during the month. Alongside INC Ransom, Storm, DragonForce, Qilin, and The Gentlemen were among the top five most active threat groups, underscoring the continued diversity and competitiveness of the ransomware ecosystem.

Figure 1. Activity from the top 5 threat groups in August 2026 

Throughout the month, analysts at Arete identified several trends behind the threat actors perpetrating cybercrime activities: 

  • August 2026 was a significant month for the emergence of new threat actors, with Arete identifying several previously untracked ransomware groups, including Storm, Dark Project, DireWolf, Morpheus, Orova, Spirals, Wallstreet Team, and Zawoo Team. This trend underscores the ongoing evolution of the threat landscape and the low barriers to entry for new cybercriminal operations. 

  • Arete observed a continued use of AI-enabled capabilities across the ransomware ecosystem during August. Similar to Fulcrumsec and Setra, the newly emerged Zawoo Team appears to leverage AI-assisted analysis of stolen data, publishing highly structured and detailed victim assessments on its data leak site (DLS). Additionally, both the Aurora and Storm ransomware groups have been observed utilizing AI-driven or AI-assisted chat representatives during victim communications. These developments suggest that threat actors are increasingly incorporating AI to enhance data analysis, automate victim engagement, and improve the effectiveness and scalability of extortion operations. 

  • In August, Arete also observed that despite sustained law enforcement disruption efforts, LockBit continues to demonstrate operational resilience, likely through the expansion of its affiliate ecosystem and the evolution of its tactics. Recent activity indicates an increased reliance on data theft and exfiltration-only operations, with observed victimology suggesting a notable focus on organizations within the financial sector. 

Sources

  • Arete Internal

Report

Arete's H1 2026 Crimeware Report

Explore intelligence and operational data from the frontlines of ransomware and extortion response as we detail the most significant trends and developments in the cyber threat landscape in the first half (H1) of 2026.

Article

WinRAR Path-Traversal Vulnerability Exploited in Ransomware Attacks

CISA has warned that CVE-2025-8088, a path-traversal vulnerability in WinRAR, is being exploited in ransomware attacks. The vulnerability allows attackers to use specially crafted archive files to place malicious executables in locations such as the Windows Startup folder, enabling code execution when the system restarts. WinRAR addressed this vulnerability in version 7.13, but exploitation has continued due to challenges in updating the software. CISA's updated KEV entry now specifically identifies the vulnerability as being used in ransomware attacks. 

What’s Notable and Unique

  • The vulnerability was initially exploited as a zero-day by the Russia-linked RomCom group, enabling malware execution at user logon and supporting credential theft, cyberespionage, and ransomware-related activities.

  • CVE-2025-8088 continues to be actively exploited by both government-backed and financially motivated threat actors. Observed campaigns have been attributed to Russian- and Chinese-linked groups targeting several organizations.

  • Phishing campaigns leveraging weaponized RAR attachments exploited CVE-2025-8088 to silently place malicious payloads in autorun locations using directory traversal and Alternate Data Streams (ADS). 

  • The widespread exploitation of CVE-2025-8088 highlights strong demand for effective WinRAR exploits, with multiple underground vendors previously supplying exploit capabilities to a diverse range of threat actors. One such vendor, zeroplayer, advertised a WinRAR exploit in July 2025. 

Analyst Comments

Organizations should immediately upgrade WinRAR to version 7.13 or later and conduct an enterprise-wide inventory to identify unmanaged installations. Given that WinRAR lacks automatic updates, Group Policy support, and integration with common enterprise patch management platforms, manual verification and remediation may be required to ensure all vulnerable instances are addressed. Security teams should also enhance defenses against archive-based phishing attacks by blocking or scrutinizing unsolicited compressed files, monitoring for suspicious file creation in Windows Startup directories, and detecting abuse of ADS. With CISA now linking CVE-2025-8088 to ransomware activity, organizations should treat remediation as a high priority and actively monitor for indicators of WinRAR-based exploitation across their environments.

Sources

  • CISA Adds Three Known Exploited Vulnerabilities to Catalog

  • WinRAR vulnerability being exploited in ransomware attacks, CISA warns