EXPLORE

Article

SIEM vs. XDR: Advances in Security Monitoring and Cyber Defense

Arete Analysis

Cybersecurity 101

The cybersecurity industry is chockfull of jargon, abbreviations, and acronyms. So much so that it can often be difficult to decide which tools may provide the best protection for your company. To help, we’d like to clarify some terms and review the benefits of a few solutions.

Let’s begin with SIEMs

Security information and event management (SIEM) technology has been around for a long time. Having evolved from log aggregation, log management, and event management, SIEMs serve to collect, aggregate, analyze, and store large volumes of log data from across numerous systems.

SIEM vendors began by taking a broad approach and collecting available log and event data from almost any source across an enterprise. Over time, they extended a SIEM’s reach from the office to the manufacturing floor and beyond. The goal was to gain more complete visibility across an organization’s landscape — from firewalls and switches to operating systems and applications. Unfortunately, the level of detail in the data from each source is typically low. In other words, SIEMs provide wide, but shallow data sets, which requires far more work to derive meaning from them — and work is time and money.

Not only can it take years to map all the low–resolution log data to a meaningful alert, but also, with COVID–19 creating the new work–from–home norm, companies are now gathering far few system logs. Thanks to alternative, cloud–based solutions, many users simply never need a virtual private network (VPN) to communicate back to the company network.

Even though many SIEM solutions are adding agents to endpoints to gather and push logs to a cloud collector, if a person is working from home and not accessing the network for data, why create alerts from that computer’s logs if they don’t affect the security of the internal network? This would require a security engineer to further tune segregation issues — and that’s if you’re lucky enough to have an engineer on staff.

The advantages of EDR and XDR

Today, extended detection and response (XDR) tools are gaining traction. As the name would imply, they are an evolution of endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools, which combine antivirus with post–detection analysis capabilities — for example, enhanced alerting, automatic stopping and quarantining of malicious behavior, signature– and threat intelligence–based detection, and full–blown artificial intelligence on systems for autonomous operations.

While an XDR solution may appear similar in function to a SIEM platform, it offers much more. And that’s why Arete chooses to use XDR with our Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service.

The XDR console lives in the cloud to allow for fast, accurate reporting on what’s occurring across your entire pool of assets. In fact, it provides rich metadata on every event that occurs on monitored endpoints; records every DNS request, file access, and intercommunication between computers; and uses artificial intelligence to detect inappropriate actions by programs and scripts, stopping them before they can affect the kernel or memory.

XDR can also threat hunt for indicators related to attack precursors, which allows us to notify you of inappropriate communications coming through your firewalls or from unprotected endpoints that may be connected to your environment. It also static detects badness as malicious actors touch or execute files. In short, it’s hard to hide from XDR — and in using it to protect the core systems that contain your data, Arete protects your ability to do business.

Other advantages XDR has over SIEMs include:

  • The ability to detect all assets on networks where company computers with the agent reside.

  • USB control to prevent exfiltration.

  • Firewall control native to Windows systems.

  • Network interface card control to stop communications in an emergency.

  • Vulnerability data on all covered Windows, Linux and Mac systems.

XDR tools are not only capable of reporting on ransomware damage, but their autonomous behavior-based capabilities can detect and stop ransomware before it can cause any damage.

Back to Blog Posts

Article

Ransomware Trends & Data Insights: October 2026

Although Akira once again emerged as the most active ransomware group in October, overall ransomware and extortion activity was not dominated by any single threat group and instead remained widely distributed among a variety of threat actors, continuing the trend that began around August. Arete identified 31 unique named threat groups in October, the most observed in a single month so far in 2026. In addition to Akira, Settra, and The Gentlemen were among the three most active groups. Several new threat actors also emerged, including BYOD, Kubera Team, QWCrypt, AoQin, Emperador, Osiris Team, and Cinder, with Cinder assessed as possibly part of a threat actor cluster affiliated with the former BlackFile group.

Figure 1. Activity from the top 10 threat groups in October 2026

Throughout the month, analysts at Arete identified several trends behind the threat actors perpetrating cybercrime activities:

  • PHP2Shell emerged as one of the most significant threats in October, with increasing exploitation of the critical PHP vulnerabilities CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619. Other notable vulnerabilities included CVE-2026-104286 affecting FortiMail, and CVE-2026-102255, a critical pre-authentication Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability affecting SonicWall SMA1000 appliances, highlighting continued threat actor interest in internet-facing enterprise infrastructure.

  • International law enforcement operations against cybercriminal groups continued to make headlines in October. German authorities announced the arrest of 28-year-old Russian national Vladimir K., suspected of being a senior operator within the Qilin Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) group. Separately, the FBI arrested an individual with suspected links to ShinyHunters, adding to recent law enforcement activity targeting ransomware and extortion groups, including the disruption of KillSec. While Vladimir K.’s arrest has not yet had a notable impact on Qilin’s operational activity, it could provide law enforcement with greater insight into the group’s infrastructure and affiliate network, potentially supporting further disruption efforts.

  • In early October, “The Luna Moth Files” exposed several files containing alleged internal communications associated with Luna Moth, also known as Silent Ransom Group, revealing insights into the group’s social engineering, data extortion, and victim negotiation operations. However, several claims remain unverified, and the exposure has not notably disrupted the group’s activity thus far, as it was among the top threat actors Arete observed throughout the month.

Sources

  • Arete Internal

Article

PHP2Shell Exploitation Update

PHP2Shell exploitation activity continues to increase globally, with threat actors targeting the critical PHP remote code execution (RCE) vulnerabilities CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619. Researchers recently identified low-volume scanning targeting unpatched or partially mitigated hosts across multiple countries and sectors, and the activity is assessed with moderate confidence as linked to a Korean-speaking operator associated with the Lazarus Group ecosystem. While PHP2Shell (CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619) has been patched in PHP 8.5.12, 8.4.27, 8.3.36, and 8.2.35, the separately identified CVE-2026-115560 remains unpatched. 

What’s Notable and Unique

  • PHP2Shell vulnerabilities can cause memory corruption due to improper error handling, potentially allowing threat actors to achieve remote code execution on vulnerable PHP servers.

  • Observed activity includes mass scanning, PHP environment fingerprinting, exploitation attempts, credential and secret theft attempts, and attempts to deliver second-stage payloads and malware.

  • Successful in-the-wild exploitation has also been reported against honeypots, resulting in shell command execution and the retrieval of additional payloads, demonstrating the potential for follow-on malicious activity.

Mitigations

Organizations should prioritize upgrading internet-facing PHP deployments to patched versions, migrating unsupported PHP versions, updating embedded and containerized PHP runtimes, and implementing available Web Application Firewall (WAF) protections as a temporary defense-in-depth measure.

Analyst Comments

PHP2Shell poses a significant security concern due to its potential to enable unauthenticated remote code execution on vulnerable PHP servers. The progression from mass scanning and exploitation attempts to reports of successful command execution demonstrates the potential for these vulnerabilities to support initial access and subsequent malicious activity. Arete has been closely monitoring PHP2Shell exploitation activity and regularly reviewing and updating related indicators to support detection and blocking efforts. Given the potential for remote exploitation and follow-on activity, PHP2Shell represents a high-priority initial-access risk, emphasizing the importance of timely patching and remediation of affected PHP environments.  

Sources

  • PHP shares mitigation for new RCE vulnerability with no patch 

  • PHP2Shell Exploitation Attempts Continue Amid Suspected N. Korea Global Scanning Activity 

  • PHP2Shell Exploit Attempts Hit Millions as Attackers Try to Deploy Mirai Malware 

  • Advisory: PHP2Shell Vulnerabilities (CVE-2026-109618, CVE-2026-109619) 

Article

LiteLLM Supply-Chain Compromise

A software supply-chain attack compromised the release pipeline of LiteLLM, a widely used open-source Python SDK and AI gateway. Attackers leveraged the compromised pipeline on October 21st to publish a malicious LiteLLM version through PyPI and associated Docker registries. The affected release, LiteLLM 1.107.0, contained malware designed to steal credentials, sensitive configuration data, private keys, browser information, and other secrets from compromised systems.

What’s Notable and Unique

  • The incident is particularly significant because LiteLLM provides a common API for applications to interact with AI models from multiple providers. It is reported that the project had approximately 61,800 GitHub stars and 92 million monthly PyPI downloads.

  • Rather than modifying the core LiteLLM application source code, the threat actors reportedly tampered with the installation package itself. The malware was designed for broad credential and information theft and encrypted the collected data before uploading it to the attacker's endpoint.

  • The compromise went beyond one-time credential theft. A malicious Python component launched a detached loader that checked a GitHub-hosted pointer every hour and could download Python code from an external server for execution on the compromised machine. This provided threat actors with a mechanism for subsequent remote code execution.

Analyst Comments

Although the malicious packages were subsequently removed, simply uninstalling or deleting the affected LiteLLM package may not be sufficient, because malicious Python startup files or the detached loader could remain on the host. All exposed information should be rotated immediately, and infected systems should be isolated and rebuilt from clean backups. The most recent clean release prior to the attack, LiteLLM 1.106.2, is currently the suggested recovery version.

Sources

  • LiteLLM release pipeline hacked to distribute info-stealer malware

  • LiteLLM 1.107.0 Compromised: Python Startup Hooks Steal Cloud, AI, and Proxy Credentials

  • The Collector Reaches Beyond Provider API Keys

Article

French Supermarket Cyberattack Highlights Risks in Exposed Refrigeration Controllers

Hundreds of French supermarkets were reportedly affected by a cyberattack in which threat actors compromised internet-connected refrigeration controllers and manipulated temperature and defrost settings, which caused refrigeration units to overheat, resulting in widespread food spoilage and significant financial loss. Impacted refrigeration systems were associated with Danfoss, Copeland, and Dixell, and demonstrated how vulnerabilities in industrial control systems (ICS) can disrupt physical operations without relying on conventional data theft or encryption. The attack also raised concerns about the wider exposure of similar devices, as thousands of refrigeration management interfaces remain accessible from the public internet. The incident highlights the growing risk posed by insecure operational technology (OT), particularly where legacy equipment and remote-management interfaces lack adequate security controls.

What’s Notable and Unique

  • Researchers identified approximately 2,765 internet-accessible Danfoss AK-SM 800A interfaces during assessment. This figure reflects the scope of that research and should not be interpreted as a current count of exposed devices. Publicly accessible management interfaces increase the opportunity for unauthorized access to industrial equipment.


  • Research also identified several security flaws in the Danfoss AK-SM 800A platform, including an authentication bypass command injection that could enable remote code execution and a weakness involving web-server configuration changes. Danfoss addressed these findings through firmware updates.


  • Authorities reported compromised Danfoss AK-SM and AK-SC systems, alongside Copeland XWEB and Dixell XWEB monitoring platforms.

Analyst Comments

The incident demonstrates the business consequences of insufficiently secured industrial infrastructure and reinforces the need to integrate OT security into enterprise risk management. Organizations operating connected facility systems should establish clear ownership of industrial assets, enforce secure remote-access policies, and prioritize remediation based on exposure and operational criticality. The findings also highlight the importance of coordinating security teams with facilities and engineering personnel to ensure that protective measures do not compromise essential operations. A risk-based approach to OT security can help organizations reduce exposure while maintaining the availability and reliability of critical equipment. 

Sources

  • France Supermarket Hacks Expose Risks of Internet-Facing Refrigeration Systems

  • Freeze the Controller, Defrost the Food: Uncovering Vulnerabilities in Danfoss Refrigeration Controllers

  • Attackers Heat French Supermarket Fridges Up to 50°C by Hijacking Danfoss Controllers