EXPLORE

Article

SIEM vs. XDR: Advances in Security Monitoring and Cyber Defense

Arete Analysis

Cybersecurity 101

The cybersecurity industry is chockfull of jargon, abbreviations, and acronyms. So much so that it can often be difficult to decide which tools may provide the best protection for your company. To help, we’d like to clarify some terms and review the benefits of a few solutions.

Let’s begin with SIEMs

Security information and event management (SIEM) technology has been around for a long time. Having evolved from log aggregation, log management, and event management, SIEMs serve to collect, aggregate, analyze, and store large volumes of log data from across numerous systems.

SIEM vendors began by taking a broad approach and collecting available log and event data from almost any source across an enterprise. Over time, they extended a SIEM’s reach from the office to the manufacturing floor and beyond. The goal was to gain more complete visibility across an organization’s landscape — from firewalls and switches to operating systems and applications. Unfortunately, the level of detail in the data from each source is typically low. In other words, SIEMs provide wide, but shallow data sets, which requires far more work to derive meaning from them — and work is time and money.

Not only can it take years to map all the low–resolution log data to a meaningful alert, but also, with COVID–19 creating the new work–from–home norm, companies are now gathering far few system logs. Thanks to alternative, cloud–based solutions, many users simply never need a virtual private network (VPN) to communicate back to the company network.

Even though many SIEM solutions are adding agents to endpoints to gather and push logs to a cloud collector, if a person is working from home and not accessing the network for data, why create alerts from that computer’s logs if they don’t affect the security of the internal network? This would require a security engineer to further tune segregation issues — and that’s if you’re lucky enough to have an engineer on staff.

The advantages of EDR and XDR

Today, extended detection and response (XDR) tools are gaining traction. As the name would imply, they are an evolution of endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools, which combine antivirus with post–detection analysis capabilities — for example, enhanced alerting, automatic stopping and quarantining of malicious behavior, signature– and threat intelligence–based detection, and full–blown artificial intelligence on systems for autonomous operations.

While an XDR solution may appear similar in function to a SIEM platform, it offers much more. And that’s why Arete chooses to use XDR with our Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service.

The XDR console lives in the cloud to allow for fast, accurate reporting on what’s occurring across your entire pool of assets. In fact, it provides rich metadata on every event that occurs on monitored endpoints; records every DNS request, file access, and intercommunication between computers; and uses artificial intelligence to detect inappropriate actions by programs and scripts, stopping them before they can affect the kernel or memory.

XDR can also threat hunt for indicators related to attack precursors, which allows us to notify you of inappropriate communications coming through your firewalls or from unprotected endpoints that may be connected to your environment. It also static detects badness as malicious actors touch or execute files. In short, it’s hard to hide from XDR — and in using it to protect the core systems that contain your data, Arete protects your ability to do business.

Other advantages XDR has over SIEMs include:

  • The ability to detect all assets on networks where company computers with the agent reside.

  • USB control to prevent exfiltration.

  • Firewall control native to Windows systems.

  • Network interface card control to stop communications in an emergency.

  • Vulnerability data on all covered Windows, Linux and Mac systems.

XDR tools are not only capable of reporting on ransomware damage, but their autonomous behavior-based capabilities can detect and stop ransomware before it can cause any damage.

Back to Blog Posts

Article

Ransomware Trends & Data Insights: July 2026

INC Ransom was the most active threat group in July, while activity remained relatively distributed among multiple threat groups, with 19 unique groups observed throughout the month. Alongside INC Ransom, Qilin, Global Secret Group, Anubis, and DragonForce rounded out the five most active threat groups observed in July. Several emerging threat actors were also observed during the month, including Booba Team, Settra, and Global Secret Group.

Figure 1. Activity from the top 3 threat groups in July 2026

 Throughout the month, analysts at Arete identified several trends behind the threat actors perpetrating cybercrime activities:

  • In July 2026, Global Secret Group emerged as a new threat actor, leveraging the leaked LockBit 3.0 (LockBit Black) source code. Although the group began operations in June 2026, it quickly accumulated a substantial number of victims on its data leak site (DLS). The group operates through TOR-based negotiation portals and qTox communications. Notably, its DLS provides step-by-step guidance on purchasing Bitcoin, including references to Coinbase and Binance, demonstrating a streamlined, victim-focused extortion process designed to simplify ransom payments.

  • Similar to Fulcrumsec, the recently emerged Settra ransomware group appears to leverage AI-driven analysis of stolen data, publishing detailed and highly structured victim reports on its DLS. Additionally, a potential EDR-disabling tool, edr_blind.exe, was identified in multiple cases, suggesting a focus on defense-evasion capabilities.

  • With the continuation of the FortiBleed campaign, researchers have now identified compromised FortiGate credentials being leveraged by both the INC and Lynx ransomware operations. Analysis revealed direct operational links between the groups, including shared ransomware infrastructure and overlap between FortiBleed victims and ransomware targets. The operators are also incorporating AI to enhance various stages of the attack lifecycle and increase operational efficiency and scale. Notably, Arete also observed an INC ransomware intrusion leveraging FortiBleed-derived access in July, reinforcing the campaign's role as a precursor to ransomware deployment.

Sources

  • Arete Internal

Podcast

Cyber Campfire: June Threat Trends & Insights

In this episode of Arete’s Cyber Campfire podcast, our Threat Intelligence Team discusses trends, statistics, and emerging threat actors from June 2026. Tune in for firsthand insights on today’s threat landscape that can enhance your approach to cyber risk.

Article

Current: Misconfigured Server Reveals Multiple Phishing Campaigns

Researchers uncovered three Microsoft 365 phishing campaigns after discovering a misconfigured HTTP server that exposed a threat actor’s phishing tools, configurations, victim logs, and operational infrastructure. The investigation revealed two operators using custom Evilginx-based adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing frameworks to steal authentication sessions and bypass MFA protections. A third operator abused Microsoft’s OAuth Device Code flow by tricking victims into completing authentication through Microsoft’s legitimate login process, allowing attackers to obtain valid access and refresh tokens without stealing passwords. The largest campaign compromised at least 218 victims across 12 countries, primarily targeting corporate Microsoft 365 accounts, with refresh tokens enabling persistent access. Researchers also identified the use of remote management tools for maintaining access, AI-assisted development of phishing tooling, and links to broader Phishing-as-a-Service (PhaaS) ecosystems, highlighting how commodity frameworks and automation are lowering the barrier for sophisticated identity-based attacks.

What’s Notable and Unique

  • The campaigns demonstrate the continued shift from traditional credential theft to identity- and token-based compromise, in which attackers target authentication sessions, cookies, and OAuth tokens rather than relying solely on password theft. By obtaining valid authentication artifacts, attackers can access Microsoft 365 environments while bypassing conventional MFA protections.


  • The use of Evilginx-based AiTM frameworks highlights how publicly available phishing tools have evolved into effective MFA-bypass platforms. These frameworks proxy legitimate login pages, capture authenticated sessions, and allow attackers to reuse valid sessions without requiring victims’ credentials again.


  • The OAuth Device Code flow abuse represents a different attack method, in which attackers leverage a legitimate Microsoft authentication mechanism to obtain tokens after victims approve the request. This approach bypasses password theft entirely by abusing trusted authentication workflows.


  • The exposed infrastructure provided insight into attacker operations, including phishing configurations, victim tracking data, remote administration tools, and evidence of AI-assisted development. The findings demonstrate how phishing ecosystems now provide reusable tooling and automation that reduce the technical expertise required to conduct large-scale identity attacks.

Analyst Comments

These Microsoft 365 phishing campaigns demonstrate the ongoing evolution of identity-focused attacks, as adversaries increasingly target authentication sessions, tokens, and legitimate cloud authorization mechanisms to bypass traditional security controls. The combination of AiTM phishing, OAuth abuse, remote management tools, and PhaaS infrastructure enables threat actors to maintain persistent access while blending into legitimate cloud activity.

The growing availability of phishing frameworks and AI-assisted attack development highlights the need for continuous identity security improvements beyond traditional phishing defenses. Arete recommends that organizations strengthen identity monitoring, adopt phishing-resistant MFA where possible, review OAuth application permissions, monitor token activity, and implement conditional access policies to detect and restrict suspicious Microsoft 365 authentication behavior. Security teams should also monitor post-compromise indicators such as abnormal mailbox access, suspicious application consent, unauthorized remote tools, and unusual sign-in activity.

Sources

  • One Misconfigured Server, Three Active Campaigns: Full exposure of three AiTM Phishing Operators

  • Misconfigured Server Reveals Three Evilginx Phishing Operations Targeting Microsoft 365

Podcast

Digital Forensics Meets the Courtroom: Insights on Expert Witness and Cyber-Related Litigation

In this episode of Bytes of Insight, host Vinny Sakore and special guest Dr. Bruce Hartley, Managing Director and Co-Founder of Advisory Services at Arete, discuss the evolving role of digital forensics and expert witness work in cybersecurity litigation. Tune in for firsthand insights on how Arete conducts post-breach investigations, what it takes to undergo cross-examination on the stand, and how emerging threats like AI-driven social engineering and third-party breaches are reshaping the advisory landscape.