Article
Threat Actor Leverages AI to Breach FortiGate Devices
Arete Analysis

Amazon Threat Intelligence recently reported that between January 11th and February 18th, a threat actor leveraged commercially available generative AI services to conduct a large-scale campaign against FortiGate firewalls, compromising more than 600 devices in over 55 countries.
Interestingly, the campaign did not rely on zero-day exploits; rather, it targeted internet-exposed management interfaces, gaining access through weak or reused credentials protected only by single-factor authentication. After gaining initial entry, the threat actor extracted full device configurations, exposing VPN credentials, admin accounts, and network topology details. Stolen credentials also enabled lateral movement into other internal environments. Specifically, the attacker conducted reconnaissance and escalated privileges within networks, compromising Active Directory domains and credential databases and targeting backup systems. Most notably, the operation heavily leveraged commercial generative AI tools to plan, automate, and scale attacks.
What’s Notable and Unique
Scale Achieved Without Advanced Exploitation: The campaign succeeded without zero-day vulnerabilities or complex exploit chains. Instead, the actor relied on exposed management interfaces and weak credentials, demonstrating that basic security gaps can be exploited on a global scale through automation.
Extensive Use of AI Across the Attack Lifecycle: The threat actor used several commercial generative AI services to plan attacks, develop tools, and make operational decisions. AI was not just an add-on; it was part of nearly every phase of reconnaissance and post-compromise activity.
AI-Generated Tooling with Limited Technical Depth: Custom reconnaissance and automation scripts displayed clear signs of AI-assisted development. While they worked for routine tasks, the tools lacked strength and often failed in more complex or unusual environments.
Opportunistic Targeting with Pre-Ransomware Indicators: The observed activity seemed random and driven by volume rather than focused on specific sectors. However, the targeting of Active Directory credential stores and backup infrastructure suggests preparation for possible ransomware deployment.
Mitigation for Companies Using FortiGate
In this specific campaign against FortiGate devices, organizations using the appliances should ensure that management interfaces are not directly exposed to the public internet or at least limit access to trusted IP addresses. As an added precaution, all administrative and VPN passwords should be changed. Further, organizations should require multi-factor authentication for all management and VPN access, review configurations for unauthorized accounts or policy changes, and monitor for unusual VPN authentication traffic and unexpected Active Directory replication access.
Analyst Comments
AI augmentation in this campaign significantly lowered the technical barrier to performing large-scale intrusions. While this threat actor was proficient in automation, they lacked innovation, as demonstrated by low expertise in exploit development. For example, the actor had difficulty moving in environments where patches were applied as well as in environments where access controls were properly enforced. Commercial AI tools enabled the threat actor to quickly create scripts, workflows, and structured attack plans, allowing them to perform attacks at a scale that would normally require a larger group effort. This campaign highlights that AI is a tool that can improve efficiency at scale, but is not a replacement for technical exploitative skills. As the use of AI increases, high-volume intrusion attempts will likely become more common, underscoring the need for best-in-practice security measures such as patch management, least-privileged access, and multi-factor authentication.
Sources
Back to Blog Posts
Article
Adversarial AI Evolves from Prompting to Autonomous Attack Workflows
Cybercriminals and state-linked threat actors are increasingly incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into multiple stages of offensive operations. Rather than relying on AI only for content generation or research, threat actors are now consistently using it to support reconnaissance, vulnerability discovery, credential theft, malware development, social engineering, and activities following initial compromise. The growing use of automated and agent-based workflows is allowing adversaries to coordinate offensive malicious activities with less manual involvement, potentially increasing the speed, scale, and efficiency of future campaigns.
What’s Notable and Unique
In one observed campaign, threat actors used AI to plan, build, and conduct an automated credential-harvesting operation within just several hours, demonstrating how compromised infrastructure can be rapidly repurposed to support larger-scale malicious activity.
Arete has observed several threat groups using AI-assisted capabilities to facilitate the analysis of data obtained during exfiltration so far this year, including INC Ransom, FulcrumSec, and Settra.
Attackers are also attempting to reproduce proprietary AI capabilities. Large-scale automated prompting campaigns have been used to extract information about the behavior and capabilities of proprietary AI models. The use of numerous accounts and intermediary infrastructure can make these activities more difficult to identify and attribute.
Analyst Comments
AI is increasingly becoming an operational component in the threat landscape rather than simply a tool that improves attacker productivity. By connecting reconnaissance, development, credential operations, and other activities through automated workflows, threat actors can conduct campaigns more quickly and reduce reliance on continuous human input. This trend also impacts security requirements for organizations deploying AI technologies. AI models, development environments, cloud resources, identities, repositories, and automated workflows should increasingly be considered interconnected elements of the enterprise attack surface, and organizations should maintain visibility across these areas and ensure that security controls account for both conventional threats and AI-enabled attack techniques.
Sources
GTIG AI Threat Tracker: From Prompting to Autonomy – The Evolution of Adversarial AI
Article
Top 9 Security Controls for SMBs
In today’s complex cyber threat landscape, small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) should implement a layered, multi-pronged approach to security. Here are some proven, effective controls to consider:
1. Implement MFA for All Users
Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is an effective and accessible way to protect sensitive data, comply with regulatory standards, and prevent unauthorized access to critical systems. By ensuring that users not only use a password but also a secure token, an organization can significantly reduce phishing attempts, credential stuffing attacks, and ransomware incidents. MFA should be enabled for email, VPN, and critical system access.
2. Update Patch Management Programs
A modern patching program should include policies and mechanisms to manage software updates in a timely manner. Patching efforts should address not just operating system updates, but also commonly utilized software within the environment. An active patching plan aims to reduce the mean time to patch and provide metrics on existing patch efforts. In the event of a high-severity vulnerability, a mature patching program should also be able to identify the risks and exposure for a given set of systems based on the average time to patch. This helps stakeholders make informed decisions when a new exploit is released.
3. Leverage a Properly Managed Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Tool
With real-time threat detection and advanced visibility, endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions can enhance an organization’s ability to detect and investigate potential malicious activity, including ransomware, lateral movement, fileless attacks, and more. Effective management of EDR should include proper configuration, regular agent updates, and established procedures for responding to alerts.
4. Enhance EDR with Frontline Incident Intelligence
While EDR solutions are an important component of a security program, threat actors are continually adapting their techniques to evade detection, and as a result, standard detection methods may not always identify emerging threats or novel attack behaviors. To strengthen protection, organizations can supplement EDR tools with custom detection rules informed by incident response data. These rules can help identify indicators of compromise observed during cyber incidents, providing an additional layer of visibility beyond traditional detections.
Arete Bloktd℠ illustrates this approach by transforming threat intelligence and malware analysis into curated detection rules for EDR tools. Applying frontline intelligence to security tools can result in earlier detection, less investigative burden, and a more confident response.
5. Create and Continuously Test an Incident Response (IR) Plan
An incident response plan can help an organization effectively identify, respond to, and recover from a cybersecurity incident while minimizing disruption and downtime. An IR plan defines clear roles, escalation paths, communication strategies, and decision frameworks for both internal and external teams. To be effective, these plans should be regularly tested with post-incident reviews or tabletop exercises involving key stakeholders.
6. Maintain Encrypted and Tested Data Backups
In the case of a cyberattack, backups can help organizations maintain business continuity, support ransom negotiations with threat actors, and contribute to a timely and successful recovery. Encrypting backups makes it more difficult for threat actors to access or alter them, and regular testing ensures they remain accessible during a security incident.
7. Conduct Employee Security Awareness Training
Human error is a leading cause of cybersecurity incidents, and an organization’s employees are its first line of defense against cyber threats. Security awareness training reinforces the importance of data confidentiality, supports regulatory compliance, and helps employees recognize and understand red flags such as suspicious emails, malicious links, and social engineering attempts.
8. Assess and Address Existing Risk and Vulnerabilities
To maintain a proactive approach to risk management and improve resilience, organizations should regularly assess existing vulnerabilities through expert-led Vulnerability Assessments, Penetration Testing, and Threat Hunting Assessments. These exercises can help identify security gaps, support regulatory compliance, and prevent potential incidents. During remediation, prioritize high-impact vulnerabilities and make a plan for periodic assessments.
9. Apply Least-Privilege Access Controls
Employees should have access only to the systems, applications, and data necessary to perform their jobs. By removing unnecessary administrative privileges and regularly reviewing user permissions, organizations can reduce the risk of unauthorized access and limit the damage caused by compromised accounts or insider threats.
Organizations should regularly review their cybersecurity programs, stay informed about emerging threats, and evaluate whether their security controls are adapting to the evolving threat landscape.
Article
Ransomware Trends & Data Insights: August 2026
Although INC Ransom was the most active ransomware threat group observed in August 2026, overall activity remained relatively distributed across the threat landscape, with approximately 30 unique ransomware and extortion groups, including both established and newly emerged actors, observed during the month. Alongside INC Ransom, Storm, DragonForce, Qilin, and The Gentlemen were among the top five most active threat groups, underscoring the continued diversity and competitiveness of the ransomware ecosystem.

Figure 1. Activity from the top 5 threat groups in August 2026
Throughout the month, analysts at Arete identified several trends behind the threat actors perpetrating cybercrime activities:
August 2026 was a significant month for the emergence of new threat actors, with Arete identifying several previously untracked ransomware groups, including Storm, Dark Project, DireWolf, Morpheus, Orova, Spirals, Wallstreet Team, and Zawoo Team. This trend underscores the ongoing evolution of the threat landscape and the low barriers to entry for new cybercriminal operations.
Arete observed a continued use of AI-enabled capabilities across the ransomware ecosystem during August. Similar to Fulcrumsec and Setra, the newly emerged Zawoo Team appears to leverage AI-assisted analysis of stolen data, publishing highly structured and detailed victim assessments on its data leak site (DLS). Additionally, both the Aurora and Storm ransomware groups have been observed utilizing AI-driven or AI-assisted chat representatives during victim communications. These developments suggest that threat actors are increasingly incorporating AI to enhance data analysis, automate victim engagement, and improve the effectiveness and scalability of extortion operations.
In August, Arete also observed that despite sustained law enforcement disruption efforts, LockBit continues to demonstrate operational resilience, likely through the expansion of its affiliate ecosystem and the evolution of its tactics. Recent activity indicates an increased reliance on data theft and exfiltration-only operations, with observed victimology suggesting a notable focus on organizations within the financial sector.
Sources
Arete Internal
Report
Arete's H1 2026 Crimeware Report
Explore intelligence and operational data from the frontlines of ransomware and extortion response as we detail the most significant trends and developments in the cyber threat landscape in the first half (H1) of 2026.



