Report
Threat Actor Spotlight: BlackSuit Ransomware
Arete Analysis
Tips

Download The Report
Executive Summary
Since May 2023, Arete’s Incident Response (IR) team has responded to multiple BlackSuit ransomware engagements against organizations in the healthcare, financial services, manufacturing, professional services, public service, entertainment, and retail sectors. This spotlight explores the ransomware behavior observed, statistics from IR engagements, and background information on the threat actor. Finally, we discuss security recommendations to better defend against this evolving cyber threat and mitigate the risk of financial and reputational losses arising from these incidents.
Incident Response Data on BlackSuit Ransomware
The information below is based on BlackSuit incidents investigated by Arete since May 2023. Our IR and teams work together to analyze key data points during every ransomware engagement and form real-time threat actor (TA) insights.
Arete has investigated dozens of engagements involving BlackSuit.
We have been extremely successful in negotiating discounted ransoms with this TA.
The highest observed ransom demand is around $18 million.
The average initial demand is around $2.5 million.
The average ransom payment facilitated is around $500,000.
Commonly observed methods of intrusions include remote desktop protocol (RDP), virtual private network (VPN), and firewall vulnerabilities.
Tools observed during the investigations include CobaltStrike, WinRAR, PUTTY, Rclone, Advanced IP Scanner, Network Scanner, Mimikatz, and GMER.
A commonly observed ransom note filename is readme.blacksuit.txt.
In some instances, backups were encrypted or deleted, while in others, backups were used for restoration.
Background
The information about the BlackSuit threat actor group in this section was shared in Arete’s 2024 Q1 Crimeware Report.
The most notable newcomer in Q1 was BlackSuit, the third most active group of Q1. Although Arete first observed BlackSuit ransomware operating in May 2023, it only accounted for less than a half percent of the total engagements in 2023. The group significantly increased its activity in Q1 2024, and there were more BlackSuit engagements in February 2024 alone than in all of 2023. BlackSuit operates as a private group without affiliates, targeting both Windows and Linux users and utilizing a double extortion method of stealing and encrypting sensitive data on a victim’s network.
BlackSuit: A Continuation of Royal Ransomware?
The BlackSuit ransomware payload has significant code overlap with Royal ransomware, and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the FBI believe BlackSuit to likely be a rebranding or spinoff variant of Royal. While BlackSuit could be using the same developer or code with slight modifications, Arete also observed language used by BlackSuit in ransom negotiations identical to previous engagements with Royal, which lends to the assessment that the group might be a rebrand or offshoot. Regardless, BlackSuit’s emergence demonstrates that although names may change, threat actors will find ways to adapt and evolve their operations.

Figure 1. Language from two separate BlackSuit TOR chats (Source: Arete)

Figure 2. Identical language from two separate Royal TOR chats (Source: Arete)
Technical Analysis
Malware analysis revealed that BlackSuit ransomware:
Supports multiple command-line arguments.
Encrypts files on the system and mounted shares.
Adds the following extension to encrypted files: .blacksuit (e.g., file.docx.blacksuit).
Creates a ransom note with the following filename: readme.blacksuit.txt.
Self-identifies the group as BlackSuit in the ransom note.
References a data leak site in the ransom note that, when accessed, self-identifies the group as BlackSuit.
Kills a list of processes and services.
Maintains a list of whitelisted files and directories to make sure it will not render the system unusable, preventing recovery when running a decryptor.
Attempts to prevent system recovery by deleting the system’s volume shadow copies.
Creates the following mutex during execution: WLm87eV1oNRx6P3E4Cy9.
Execution Pattern/Arguments
BlackSuit ransomware needs command line arguments to execute and encrypt files in the system. Command line arguments supported:
Command line argument | Description |
|---|---|
-id [32-byte characters] | Ransomware ID |
-size | Invoked with drag and drop |
-ep | Number that represents the percentage of the file that will be encrypted |
-path [target_directory_path] | Used to specify a target directory to encrypt |
-localonly | Encrypt only the local system |
-networkonly | Encrypt only shared volumes/directory |
-aavm | Encrypt all files |
The ransomware will not execute in the system without the “–id” argument followed by a 32-character value that is unique in each engagement and present in the ransom note TOR URL. Portion of the data in the ransom note that contains the ID:
All your files will be decrypted, your data will be reset, your systems will stay in safe. Contact us through TOR browser using the link: http://c7jpc6h2ccrdwmhofuij7kz6sr2fg2ndtbvvqy4fse23cf7m2e5hvqid[.]onion/?id=[32-characters] | ||
|---|---|---|
Execution of ransomware to encrypt files:
blacksuit.exe -id [32-characters] | ||
|---|---|---|
The ransomware developer coded the logic to allow configuration of the 32-character value in the command line during execution. This same victim-specific 32-character string value is then added to the ransom note URL used for negotiations. Due to this implementation in the ransomware code, threat researchers can execute the ransomware without knowing the 32-character string value, as any value of this type can be used to execute the malicious code. In analyzing Royal ransomware samples, Arete found a similarity in that any 32-character value can be supplied to execute the ransomware, and the value is also added to the ransom note TOR chat URL.
Example of how the ransom note content looks with a randomly supplied string (e.g., blacksuit.exe -id 7777777777777777777777777777777):
All your files will be decrypted, your data will be reset, your systems will stay in safe. Contact us through TOR browser using the link: http://c7jpc6h2ccrdwmhofuij7kz6sr2fg2ndtbvvqy4fse23cf7m2e5hvqid[.]onion/?id=77777777777777777777777777777777777777 | ||
|---|---|---|
Obfuscated Files or Information: Software Packing
Most of the strings in the ransomware are encoded. The encoded strings are hardcoded and decoded at runtime. Every encoded string has its own decoding loop:

Figure 3. Encoded strings hardcoded

Figure 4. String decoding loop
Some relevant strings decoded in memory:
Global\\\WLm87eV1oNRx6P3E4Cy9 | -ep |
Obfuscated Files or Information: Dynamic API Resolution
To avoid static or other defensive analysis, the ransomware uses dynamic API resolution to conceal malware characteristics and functionality. The ransomware initially decrypts DLL names, then loads the APIs. Hardcoded encoded DLL names are shown below:

Figure 5. Encoded DLL names

Figure 6. DLL name decoding loop
DLL names decoded at runtime:
shell32.dll | rstrtmgr.dll |
Stop Services and Processes
Before file encryption, the ransomware terminates a list of known running processes and services to encrypt as many files as possible. BlackSuit ransomware utilizes the Windows Restart Manager to terminate any process using files other than explorer.exe or a critical process.
Sequence of Windows Restart Manager APIs used by the ransomware:
RmStartSession | Starts the Restart Manager session. |
RmRegisterResources | Registers resources, in this case the targeted filename |
RmGetList | Determine which processes or services are using the registered resource (file) |
RmShutdown | Shuts down any identified process or service using the registered resource |
RmEndSession | Closes the Restart Manager session. |
The ransomware also uses Windows native CreateToolhelp32Snapshot, Process32FirstW, and Process32NextW APIs to enumerate processes in the system.
File and Directory Exclusions
The ransomware excludes system-related files and folders, ransomware-related files, and whitelisted extensions during encryption.
Excluded file extensions:
.com .ani .scr .drv .hta .rom .bin .msc .ps1 .shs .adv .msu .prf .bat .idx .mpa .cmd .msi .mod .ocx .ics .386 .sys .rtp .wpx .msp .cab .ldf .lnk .cur .nls .hlp .key .ico .exe .icns .lock .theme .diagpkg .diagcab .nomedia .diagcfg .msstyles .themepack .blacksuit .deskthemepack | ||
|---|---|---|
Excluded files and directories:
“msocache”, “intel”, “$recycle.bin”, “windows”, “windows.old”, “mozilla firefox”, “$WinREAgent”, “boot”, “google”, “perflogs”, “system volume information”, “appdata”, “tor browser”, “$windows.~ws”, “application data”, “$windows.~bt”, “mozilla”, “readme.blacksuit.txt” | ||
|---|---|---|
Inhibit System Recovery
Windows operating systems contain features that can help fix corrupted system files, including shadow copies, which are backups of files created by the Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS). By deleting shadow copies, the ransomware can prevent victims from restoring files from backups, making it more difficult for them to recover their data without paying the ransom.
With the CreateProcessW function, the ransomware deletes volume shadow copies before file encryption by executing the following command:
cmd.exe /c vssadmin delete shadows /all /quiet | ||
|---|---|---|
Code in the ransomware showing this operation (the EAX register contains the kernel32.CreateProcessW address):

Figure 7. Create process call to delete volume shadow copies
System Network Connections Discovery
BlackSuit ransomware can enumerate network-mounted shares by scanning the network interfaces.
Data Encrypted for Impact
The ransomware initially finds available drives and loads the files one by one using the Windows API FindFirstFileW and FindNextFileW. It then uses OpenSSL AES keys to encrypt the files and adds the extension .blacksuit to the encrypted file name.

Figure 8. Windows native CryptEncrypt API call to encrypt the data
Public key:
—–BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY—– 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 —–END RSA PUBLIC KEY—– | ||
|---|---|---|
The ransomware encrypts files, adds the .blacksuit extension at the end of the encrypted files, and adds the following bytes at the end of the file (“??” represents variable bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ?? 00 00 00 ?? 00 00 00 | ||
|---|---|---|

Figure 9. “.blacksuit” extension added to the encrypted files

Figure 10. Padding bytes in encrypted files
Upon successful execution, the ransomware creates ransom notes with the file name readme.blacksuit.txt.

Figure 11. Screenshot of BlackSuit ransom note
Modify Registry
The ransomware did not perform any registry key modification.
Mutex
The mutex is the fundamental tool for managing shared resources between multiple threads or processes. Typically, ransomware uses a mutex to avoid reinfecting the victim system and causing multiple layers of encryption. The ransomware creates the following mutex value: “WLm87eV1oNRx6P3E4Cy9”.

Figure 12. Screenshot of the mutex value created while debugging the ransomware
Network Activity
The ransomware did not try to communicate with a remote server other than encrypting data from mounted shares.
Indicators of Compromise
Indicator | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
f1684fb118d4d8fc56653fcc49e12a659b64c4459ba037fa94f21783235cc6ba | SHA256 hash | BlackSuit ransomware |
C:\readme.blacksuit.txt | File path | BlackSuit ransom note |
.blacksuit | Extension | Encrypted files extension |
vssadmin delete shadows /all /quiet | Process | Volume Shadow Copy deletion |
WLm87eV1oNRx6P3E4Cy9 | Mutex | Mutex value object created by the BlackSuit ransomware |
Any 32-character string | Password | Command line argument needed to properly execute the ransomware. The ransomware developer doesn’t validate it |
c7jpc6h2ccrdwmhofuij7kz6sr2fg2ndtbvvqy4fse23cf7m2e5hvqid [.]onion | URL | TA data leak site (DLS) |
Data Leak Site
The ransom note contains a data leak site (DLS) that displayed the following page, self-identifying the group as BlackSuit:

Figure 13. TOR DLS: c7jpc6h2ccrdwmhofuij7kz6sr2fg2ndtbvvqy4fse23cf7m2e5hvqid[.]onion

Figure 14. TOR DLS: weg7sdx54bevnvulapqu6bpzwztryeflq3s23tegbmnhkbpqz637f2yd[.]onion
Detection Mechanisms
Custom Detections and Blocking with Arete’s Arete Bloktd℠

Yara

Recommended Mitigations
Utilize an endpoint detection and response (EDR) solution with the capability to halt detected processes and isolate systems on the network based on identified conditions.
Block any known attacker C2s in the firewall.
Implement multi-factor authentication on RDP and VPN to restrict access to critical network resources.
Eliminate unnecessary RDP ports exposed to the internet.
Block a high number of SMB connection attempts from one system to others in the network over a short period of time.
Perform periodic dark web monitoring to verify if data is available for sale on the black market.
Perform penetration tests.
Periodically patch systems and update tools.
Monitor connections to the network from suspicious locations.
Monitor downloads and uploads of files to file-sharing services outside standard work hours.
Monitor file uploads from domain controllers to the internet.
Monitor network scans from uncommon servers (e.g., RDP server).
Organizations can find the full list of US government recommended ransomware prevention and mitigation guidance here: https://www.cisa.gov/stopransomware/ransomware-guide.
Arete provides data-driven cybersecurity solutions to transform your response to emerging cyber threats. Learn more.
References
Back to Blog Posts
Article
Ransomware Trends & Data Insights: July 2026
INC Ransom was the most active threat group in July, while activity remained relatively distributed among multiple threat groups, with 19 unique groups observed throughout the month. Alongside INC Ransom, Qilin, Global Secret Group, Anubis, and DragonForce rounded out the five most active threat groups observed in July. Several emerging threat actors were also observed during the month, including Booba Team, Settra, and Global Secret Group.

Figure 1. Activity from the top 3 threat groups in July 2026
Throughout the month, analysts at Arete identified several trends behind the threat actors perpetrating cybercrime activities:
In July 2026, Global Secret Group emerged as a new threat actor, leveraging the leaked LockBit 3.0 (LockBit Black) source code. Although the group began operations in June 2026, it quickly accumulated a substantial number of victims on its data leak site (DLS). The group operates through TOR-based negotiation portals and qTox communications. Notably, its DLS provides step-by-step guidance on purchasing Bitcoin, including references to Coinbase and Binance, demonstrating a streamlined, victim-focused extortion process designed to simplify ransom payments.
Similar to Fulcrumsec, the recently emerged Settra ransomware group appears to leverage AI-driven analysis of stolen data, publishing detailed and highly structured victim reports on its DLS. Additionally, a potential EDR-disabling tool, edr_blind.exe, was identified in multiple cases, suggesting a focus on defense-evasion capabilities.
With the continuation of the FortiBleed campaign, researchers have now identified compromised FortiGate credentials being leveraged by both the INC and Lynx ransomware operations. Analysis revealed direct operational links between the groups, including shared ransomware infrastructure and overlap between FortiBleed victims and ransomware targets. The operators are also incorporating AI to enhance various stages of the attack lifecycle and increase operational efficiency and scale. Notably, Arete also observed an INC ransomware intrusion leveraging FortiBleed-derived access in July, reinforcing the campaign's role as a precursor to ransomware deployment.
Sources
Arete Internal
Podcast
Cyber Campfire: June Threat Trends & Insights
In this episode of Arete’s Cyber Campfire podcast, our Threat Intelligence Team discusses trends, statistics, and emerging threat actors from June 2026. Tune in for firsthand insights on today’s threat landscape that can enhance your approach to cyber risk.
Article
Current: Misconfigured Server Reveals Multiple Phishing Campaigns
Researchers uncovered three Microsoft 365 phishing campaigns after discovering a misconfigured HTTP server that exposed a threat actor’s phishing tools, configurations, victim logs, and operational infrastructure. The investigation revealed two operators using custom Evilginx-based adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing frameworks to steal authentication sessions and bypass MFA protections. A third operator abused Microsoft’s OAuth Device Code flow by tricking victims into completing authentication through Microsoft’s legitimate login process, allowing attackers to obtain valid access and refresh tokens without stealing passwords. The largest campaign compromised at least 218 victims across 12 countries, primarily targeting corporate Microsoft 365 accounts, with refresh tokens enabling persistent access. Researchers also identified the use of remote management tools for maintaining access, AI-assisted development of phishing tooling, and links to broader Phishing-as-a-Service (PhaaS) ecosystems, highlighting how commodity frameworks and automation are lowering the barrier for sophisticated identity-based attacks.
What’s Notable and Unique
The campaigns demonstrate the continued shift from traditional credential theft to identity- and token-based compromise, in which attackers target authentication sessions, cookies, and OAuth tokens rather than relying solely on password theft. By obtaining valid authentication artifacts, attackers can access Microsoft 365 environments while bypassing conventional MFA protections.
The use of Evilginx-based AiTM frameworks highlights how publicly available phishing tools have evolved into effective MFA-bypass platforms. These frameworks proxy legitimate login pages, capture authenticated sessions, and allow attackers to reuse valid sessions without requiring victims’ credentials again.
The OAuth Device Code flow abuse represents a different attack method, in which attackers leverage a legitimate Microsoft authentication mechanism to obtain tokens after victims approve the request. This approach bypasses password theft entirely by abusing trusted authentication workflows.
The exposed infrastructure provided insight into attacker operations, including phishing configurations, victim tracking data, remote administration tools, and evidence of AI-assisted development. The findings demonstrate how phishing ecosystems now provide reusable tooling and automation that reduce the technical expertise required to conduct large-scale identity attacks.
Analyst Comments
These Microsoft 365 phishing campaigns demonstrate the ongoing evolution of identity-focused attacks, as adversaries increasingly target authentication sessions, tokens, and legitimate cloud authorization mechanisms to bypass traditional security controls. The combination of AiTM phishing, OAuth abuse, remote management tools, and PhaaS infrastructure enables threat actors to maintain persistent access while blending into legitimate cloud activity.
The growing availability of phishing frameworks and AI-assisted attack development highlights the need for continuous identity security improvements beyond traditional phishing defenses. Arete recommends that organizations strengthen identity monitoring, adopt phishing-resistant MFA where possible, review OAuth application permissions, monitor token activity, and implement conditional access policies to detect and restrict suspicious Microsoft 365 authentication behavior. Security teams should also monitor post-compromise indicators such as abnormal mailbox access, suspicious application consent, unauthorized remote tools, and unusual sign-in activity.
Sources
One Misconfigured Server, Three Active Campaigns: Full exposure of three AiTM Phishing Operators
Misconfigured Server Reveals Three Evilginx Phishing Operations Targeting Microsoft 365
Podcast
Digital Forensics Meets the Courtroom: Insights on Expert Witness and Cyber-Related Litigation
In this episode of Bytes of Insight, host Vinny Sakore and special guest Dr. Bruce Hartley, Managing Director and Co-Founder of Advisory Services at Arete, discuss the evolving role of digital forensics and expert witness work in cybersecurity litigation. Tune in for firsthand insights on how Arete conducts post-breach investigations, what it takes to undergo cross-examination on the stand, and how emerging threats like AI-driven social engineering and third-party breaches are reshaping the advisory landscape.



