EXPLORE

Article

WastedLocker Ransomware Insights

Arete Analysis

Summary

WastedLocker is a new ransomware variant with encryption capabilities that some researchers believe to be linked to the sanctioned “Evil Corp” group. However, Arete’s analysis determined that evidence of the connection is not conclusive.

On December 5th, 2019 the U.S. Department of Justice announced indictments against 17 individuals including 2 Russian nationals Maksim Yakubets and Igor Turashev that were the primary ringleaders of the Russian hacking group known as “Evil Corp”. The Treasury Department Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) followed up with the announcement of sanctions against “Evil Corp”.

Figure 1. “Wanted by FBI” poster of Maksim Yakubets

Figure 2. “Wanted by FBI” poster of Igor Turashev


At least since 2012 the criminal group operated a malware known as “Dridex” (also known as “Bugat” and “Cridex”), which was primarily delivered to victims’ systems through phishing emails. Once infected, the “Dridex” malware was able to steal users’ credentials for online financial accounts and were ultimately leveraged by cyber criminals to transfer money from the victims bank accounts to offshore accounts held by Evil Corp. In 2017 the “Evil Corp” decided to change their methodology and started to release BitPaymer ransomware through Dridex. 
 
Even with the indictments by the US DOJ, “Evil Corp” remained just as active operating as normal. According to the Arete Cyber Threat Intelligence, in recent weeks the number of victims compromised by Dridex grew significantly (i.e. 2-3x times more than the total numbers of Trickbot, Emotet and Qbot victims combined). 

Figure 3. Alleged Evil Corp mastermind Maksim Yakubets stands next to his Lamborghini Huracan

The recent research article by analysts from NCC Group shared a theory that “Evil Corp” group might be behind the WastedLocker ransomware (aka Wasted) which was originally spotted in the wild in May 2020. Based on the NCC Group’s assessment the link between Wasted and Bitpaymer was made based on a few  similarities between the two ransomware variants – i.e. the use of alternative data stream (ADS) and SocGholish fake update framework. Arete conducted research and determined that evidence of the connection between “Evil Corp” group and WastedLocker ransomware variant is not conclusive for 4 main reasons:

  1. Alternate Data Stream (ADS) is often being used by cyber criminals to hide malicious files/scripts inside of legitimate files. This method is not uniquely attributed to Wasted/Bitpaymer ransomware and has been used by other ransomware variants (e.g. TeslaCrypt, CrytoWall, Maze and etc.), at least since 2015. 

  2. SocGholish is a JavaScript-based framework that has been used in “fake updates” attacks and observed downloading Dridex, Azorult InfoStealer, NetSupport Manager RAT, and Chthonic. While the Dridex banking trojan has been directly associated with “Evil Corp” and Bitpaymer, SocGholish doesn’t appear to have an exclusive relationship with this group primarily because cyber criminals have been observed using various malware families to exploit and establish persistence. These cyber criminals are known to change their tactics and many have demonstrated change by adopting other cyber criminals malware, e.g. trojans/RATs have been used in deployments of other ransomware variants – e.g. Azorult was observed in Phobos attacks, NetSupport RAT has been associated with GandCrab attacks in the past.

  3. Dridex trojan was not found on any system for all WastedLocker ransomware matters that Arete has handled to date.

  4. No overlaps in money laundering infrastructure – blockchain analysis of payments show no overlaps in the bitcoin wallets IDs nor the exchanges used by Dridex/Bitpaymer and WastedLocker operators. While Dridex/ Bitpaymer use illegal exchanges in Russia to cash out their earnings, WastedLocker operators primarily use exchanges in Asia. 

    WastedLocker Overview

WastedLocker is a new variant of ransomware that was initially reported in May of this year. The WastedLocker ransomware encrypts files on the victims’ systems using the AES algorithm and appends the file extension .[organization initials] wasted to each file it encrypts. Wasted also generates a separate ransom note for each encrypted file. For each victim, WastedLocker operators create 2 contact email addresses which are listed in ransom notes. The ransom demands also appear to be related to the amount of research the operators have done based on what they believe the victims can afford to pay. In some instances, clients have reported compromised accounts opening financial information during the period of unauthorized access. Unlike some other ransomware variants, the decryption tool for WastedLocker is universal, meaning it will work on every system within the compromised network without requiring a unique decryptor for each system.

Continuing Research

Arete Threat Intelligence continues to work with law enforcement contacts to conduct analysis into WastedLocker. The cybercriminals behind this variant have been quick to identify and infect victims’ systems with ransomware resulting in a devastating blow to the victims’ IT infrastructure and interrupting profitable business operations. The tactics and techniques used by the group have been stealthy and have the entire security community reacting to improve defenses, share indicators, and preemptively secure their perimeters. Research continues into the tools, tactics, and procedures.

Back to Blog Posts

Article

Phishing-as-a-Service Evolves with Venom

“Whaling” has taken on a new meaning with a highly targeted phishing campaign active from November 2025 through March 2026, aimed exclusively at senior executives from more than 20 industries. The campaign, dubbed VENOM, is a phishing-as-a-service (PhaaS) platform that combines advanced evasion capabilities with immediate persistence of targeted executives. The initial phish impersonates an internal SharePoint document notification and uses embedded QR codes to convince victims to shift to unmanaged mobile devices to bypass corporate security controls. VENOM aims to establish persistence immediately by either registering a new MFA device or retaining long-lived refresh tokens, allowing threat actors to maintain access even after password resets or other base-level remediation efforts. 

What’s Notable and Unique

  •  This campaign is unique in its targeted nature of the PhaaS platform rather than broad, sweeping attempts. The threat actors behind VENOM create convincing phishing emails that impersonate SharePoint activity using the victim’s own domain, company name, and even fabricated email threads. These convincing social engineering tactics, combined with the specific targeting of executives, make this an effective capability for cybercriminals.

  •  VENOM operates as a closed-access system, with full adversarial support, but has no public visibility on the dark web or from security researchers. The service likely operates on an invite-only basis, unlike most PhaaS platforms, which typically seek to have as many paying customers as possible. This, among other items such as the sophisticated evasion techniques, indicates a higher degree of sophistication than most other PhaaS offerings.

  • Either through MFA enrollment or Microsoft Device Code abuse, the threat actor forces the victim to aid them in establishing persistence early in the attack lifecycle. These tactics result in either valid tokens or an additional MFA login method controlled by the threat actor, meaning typical password resets alone are not effective against this technique. Administrators would be required to explicitly revoke sessions and token grants to mitigate the threat actors’ persistence.

Analyst Comments

Oftentimes, MFA is viewed as a one-stop shop to cybersecurity, but tactics such as this show how threat actors can bypass MFA, or worse, use it to establish persistence. Ultimately, this campaign highlights how modern attacks increasingly abuse legitimate authentication workflows rather than attempting to defeat them outright. Defenses that rely solely on MFA without other security posturing, such as continuous session monitoring, token revocation, and identity logging, can leave organizations vulnerable. As attackers shift toward token theft and device trust abuse, incident response and identity security strategies must evolve accordingly.

Sources

  • Meet VENOM: The PhaaS Platform That Neutralizes MFA

Article

Threat Actors Continue to Leverage BYOVD Technique

Multiple ransomware operations have recently been observed leveraging the Bring Your Own Vulnerable Driver (BYOVD) technique to disable endpoint security controls prior to ransomware deployment. Notably, the Qilin ransomware group commonly leverages a malicious msimg32.dll file loaded via DLL side-loading, along with vulnerable drivers including rwdrv.sys and hlpdrv.sys, to gain kernel-level access and disable security processes. Similarly, Warlock ransomware has been observed exploiting the vulnerable NSecKrnl.sys driver to bypass security controls. The use of BYOVD has also been observed across ransomware campaigns associated with Akira, INC, Medusa, and other threat actors. 

What’s Notable and Unique 

  • The Qilin ransomware group employs a sophisticated multi-stage infection chain, leveraging DLL side-loading (msimg32.dll) to execute malicious payloads directly in memory and evade traditional file-based detection. In DLL side-loading, a threat actor tricks a program into loading a malicious dynamic link library. The malware escalates privileges and uses signed but vulnerable drivers (rwdrv.sys and hlpdrv.sys) to bypass security controls, access system memory, and systematically disable endpoint defenses by terminating security processes and disabling monitoring callbacks at the kernel level. 

  • Akira ransomware operators have also exploited the rwdrv.sys and hlpdrv.sys drivers. Additionally, Arete has observed threat actors leveraging multiple other drivers, including the vulnerable TrueSight.sys, to bypass security controls. 

  • Meanwhile, Warlock ransomware operators disguised malicious activity by renaming rclone.exe to TrendSecurity.exe to appear legitimate. The file functioned as a loader, exploiting the vulnerable NSecKrnl.sys driver to disable security processes, while Group Policy Objects (GPOs) were leveraged to systematically disable security controls across the environment. 

Analyst Comments 

The BYOVD technique, employed by multiple known ransomware operators, reflects a broader shift toward pre-encryption defense evasion, including suppression of Windows telemetry, removal of monitoring callbacks, and abuse of legitimately signed but vulnerable drivers. This technique enables threat actors to evade detection, maintain persistence for extended periods, and maximize the operational impact of ransomware deployment across compromised environments. Organizations should implement strict driver control policies, such as Microsoft’s Vulnerable Driver Blocklist and application control mechanisms. Additionally, enforcing least privilege access, enabling multi-factor authentication (MFA), maintaining up-to-date patching, and continuously monitoring for anomalous driver and kernel-level activity can further reduce the risk of such attacks. 

Sources 

  • Qilin EDR killer infection chain

  • Web Shells, Tunnels, and Ransomware: Dissecting a Warlock Attack 

Article

Ransomware Trends & Data Insights: March 2026

The threat landscape in March had a much more even distribution of threat groups than has been observed since the first half of 2025. Although Akira, Qilin, Play, and INC remained among the most active groups, Arete observed 21 unique ransomware and extortion groups in March, compared to only 15 in February. Akira and Qilin’s activity also declined from the previous month; in February, the two groups were responsible for almost half of all ransomware incidents, but in March they only comprised a little more than a quarter of all activity. Arete also observed activity from several emerging groups in the past month, including BravoX, NightSpire, Payouts King, and Securotrop.

 Figure 1. Activity from the top 5 threat groups in March 2026

Analysts at Arete identified several trends behind the threat actors perpetrating cybercrime activities:

  • In March, threat actors actively exploited FortiGate Next-Generation Firewall appliances as initial access vectors to compromise enterprise networks. The activity involves the exploitation of recently disclosed security vulnerabilities, including CVE-2025-59718, CVE-2025-59719, and CVE-2026-24858, or weak credentials, allowing attackers to gain administrative access, extract configuration files, and obtain service account credentials. Arete also observed Fortinet device exploitation involving various threat groups, with the Qilin ransomware group notably leveraging Fortinet device exploits.


  • Phishing campaigns leveraging OAuth redirection and a resurgence of Microsoft Teams–based social engineering were also observed in March. In one campaign, attackers sent emails disguised as Microsoft Teams recordings or Microsoft 365 alerts, redirecting victims through legitimate OAuth endpoints to attacker-controlled pages hosting malicious ZIP payloads. A separate campaign has been ongoing since last year, in which attackers flood users’ inboxes with spam and impersonate IT support personnel to trick victims into initiating remote support sessions via tools like Quick Assist.


  • Arete recently released its 2025 Annual Crimeware Report. Leveraging data and intelligence collected during ransomware and extortion incident response engagements, this report highlights notable trends and shifts in the threat landscape throughout 2025, including Akira’s unusually high activity levels in the second half of 2025, evolving social engineering techniques, and trends in ransom demands and impacted industries.

Sources

  • Arete Internal

Report

Arete's 2025 Annual Crimeware Report

Harness Arete’s unique data and expertise on extortion and ransomware to inform your response to the evolving threat landscape.