EXPLORE

Article

What To Do When A Hacker Encrypts Your Data

Combating Ransomware

Cyber Threats

RANSOMWARE, RANSOMWARE...

It’s the boogeyman looming in the corners of every digital task we do. Even businesses that don’t operate primarily online have data points that can be exploited, and hackers are always on the lookout for those with poor cyber health.


[This article originally appeared in Risk & Insurance at:
We Talk About Ransomware All the Time. So What Do We Actually Do When a Hacker Has Our Data? : Risk & Insurance (riskandinsurance.com)]

The cost of an attack is growing, too. As Gallagher reported in its 2022 Cyber Insurance Market Conditions Report, during the first six months of 2021, $590 million were paid in ransom payments, as opposed to $416 million paid in all of 2020.

While we talk about best practices to protect ourselves, how often do we flip the conversation and look at the steps we must take when a hack actually occurs? “Unfortunately, no one is safe from ransomware,” said Evgueni Erchov, head of security research & strategy, Arete.

“The most sophisticated groups can focus on larger organizations … but we also see the small companies being targeted all the time.”

Erchov is an experienced hacker negotiator, with more than 20 years in IT security, application development, cybercrime investigations, computer forensics, cryptocurrency blockchain and cyber threat intelligence analysis.

Erchov, alongside John Farley, managing director, cyber practice, at Gallagher, put on a recent webinar on what to do when a hacker strikes, running through a simulated hack to give businesses recovery tips.

The presentation, “What Really Happens When You Negotiate With a Hacker: An Insider’s View,” illuminated several key points, from how to communicate with hackers, where to gather cryptocurrency if a hacker demands it, and what conversations with underwriters should look like when reviewing cyber controls.

Getting in Touch with Your Hacker

Believe it or not, hacking is a business, and hackers treat what they do as such.

Organized criminals work together to suss out vulnerable targets — from a large corporation all the way down to the neighborhood corner store. If the business has the capability to store data — credit card info, health records, trade secrets, you name it — the business is a viable target.

When a hacker infiltrates a system, the language used in their demand can follow a similar pattern. Hackers will note the data they have access to — employee personal records, partner and client data, financial and accountant documents — and how they intend to gain ransom for encrypting these files.

Next steps will focus on how to communicate with the hacker.

“It depends on how sophisticated the group is,” Erchov said. “Sometimes a ransom note will contain an email address that will be used to go back and forth and negotiate a ransom.”

Money and Extortion: How Demands Lives Have Changed

“In the old days, five or six years ago, we had hackers typically freezing our data, we had extortion, but if you didn’t pay, you just didn’t get your data back,” Farley said.

The scare tactics being used by hackers are changing.

In the simulation during the presentation, the fictive hacker threatens to reveal extremely sensitive data from the company CEO if they don’t receive $1 million in bitcoin within five days. To prove how serious they are, the hacker sends an excerpt of that sensitive info.

Extortion and double extortion are commonplace for hackers these days, Erchov said.

“That really happens quite often, on average, close to 70% of cases nowadays will involve data exfiltration along with the encryption,” he said.

It’s a tactic used to encourage payment, because it not only involves the encryption of sensitive data, but it also hangs corporate reputation in the balance. The ransom becomes more than just retrieving data; it becomes about keeping that data out of public hands.

Bitcoin: How the Heck Do I get My Hands on That?

Once the decision to pay the hackers is made, the next issue is figuring out how to follow through. More hackers are demanding bitcoin payments in their ransoms, but not all companies are working in bitcoin.

So then, what do companies do when their data is held for ransom?

As noted by Farley and Erchov, people believe the first place to go for bitcoin is their cyber insurer. But this is not correct.

“The forensic investigator … the company that deals with forensic investigation and interim response, that’s typically the company that will be handling that,” Erchov said.

However, the cyber insurer can be there to guide the process.

“The beauty of the cyber insurance policy is that you have access to these companies [like a forensic investigation company] that have access to bitcoin and can facilitate the payments,” added Farley.

Forensic investigation companies are often operating on a 24/7 basis as well, and the cyber insurance policy acts as a bridge between client and forensics.

Farley noted these payments are also on reimbursement, so the cyber policy is typically designed to reimburse ransoms after the fact.

The Decision to Negotiate

While paying a hacker immediately to get encrypted data back seems like a no brainer, sometimes negotiating down the ransom is the best line of action, especially if a ransom demand is really large or unfeasible.

But what if low-balling a hacker leads to a bigger data leak?

“They almost expect the initial demand is not going to be paid,” said Erchov.

But it’s important to partner with a negotiator, he said, because the negotiation strategist knows what is a reasonable offer versus what could anger the hacker.

The good news: On average, hackers will negotiate down a ransom by 70%, according to Erchov, based on the cases his company Arete has dealt with in the past.

But that depends on several different factors.

“Potentially, the backups might be available. So in that case, if we only have to negotiate for promise of data deletion, it gives us additional leverage because we don’t need a decryption tool,” Erchov gave as an example.

Questions Your Underwriter Will Ask

“We have a very hard cyber insurance marketplace today,” said Farley. “We’re in a place where ransomware and other factors are really getting the underwriting community very nervous.”

Because of the risk landscape and the size of demand, rates are increasing. Some entities with less cyber controls in place are facing nonrenewal.

So, how can a company make itself a good risk for an underwriter?

“They are going to have a lot of questions for you,” said Farley. He noted his list was not all encompassing, but these are key areas to start.

“Multi-factor authentication. If you don’t have that in place, there’s a chance you might not get underwritten at all,” he said.

Underwriters will also want to see patch management — a written and detailed plan to manage any hacker exploitation. Point detection and response, which is technology used to find a hacker in your system and alert you to them, is another control underwriters like to see.

At the end of the day, the key thing to remember is if your company is on the receiving end of a cyber ransomware event, call your cyber partners immediately.

They will know which resources, from bitcoin, negotiators, forensics and more, will aid in appeasing the hacker and getting your data secured.

Back to Blog Posts

Article

Ransomware Trends & Data Insights: July 2026

INC Ransom was the most active threat group in July, while activity remained relatively distributed among multiple threat groups, with 19 unique groups observed throughout the month. Alongside INC Ransom, Qilin, Global Secret Group, Anubis, and DragonForce rounded out the five most active threat groups observed in July. Several emerging threat actors were also observed during the month, including Booba Team, Settra, and Global Secret Group.

Figure 1. Activity from the top 3 threat groups in July 2026

 Throughout the month, analysts at Arete identified several trends behind the threat actors perpetrating cybercrime activities:

  • In July 2026, Global Secret Group emerged as a new threat actor, leveraging the leaked LockBit 3.0 (LockBit Black) source code. Although the group began operations in June 2026, it quickly accumulated a substantial number of victims on its data leak site (DLS). The group operates through TOR-based negotiation portals and qTox communications. Notably, its DLS provides step-by-step guidance on purchasing Bitcoin, including references to Coinbase and Binance, demonstrating a streamlined, victim-focused extortion process designed to simplify ransom payments.

  • Similar to Fulcrumsec, the recently emerged Settra ransomware group appears to leverage AI-driven analysis of stolen data, publishing detailed and highly structured victim reports on its DLS. Additionally, a potential EDR-disabling tool, edr_blind.exe, was identified in multiple cases, suggesting a focus on defense-evasion capabilities.

  • With the continuation of the FortiBleed campaign, researchers have now identified compromised FortiGate credentials being leveraged by both the INC and Lynx ransomware operations. Analysis revealed direct operational links between the groups, including shared ransomware infrastructure and overlap between FortiBleed victims and ransomware targets. The operators are also incorporating AI to enhance various stages of the attack lifecycle and increase operational efficiency and scale. Notably, Arete also observed an INC ransomware intrusion leveraging FortiBleed-derived access in July, reinforcing the campaign's role as a precursor to ransomware deployment.

Sources

  • Arete Internal

Podcast

Cyber Campfire: June Threat Trends & Insights

In this episode of Arete’s Cyber Campfire podcast, our Threat Intelligence Team discusses trends, statistics, and emerging threat actors from June 2026. Tune in for firsthand insights on today’s threat landscape that can enhance your approach to cyber risk.

Article

Current: Misconfigured Server Reveals Multiple Phishing Campaigns

Researchers uncovered three Microsoft 365 phishing campaigns after discovering a misconfigured HTTP server that exposed a threat actor’s phishing tools, configurations, victim logs, and operational infrastructure. The investigation revealed two operators using custom Evilginx-based adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing frameworks to steal authentication sessions and bypass MFA protections. A third operator abused Microsoft’s OAuth Device Code flow by tricking victims into completing authentication through Microsoft’s legitimate login process, allowing attackers to obtain valid access and refresh tokens without stealing passwords. The largest campaign compromised at least 218 victims across 12 countries, primarily targeting corporate Microsoft 365 accounts, with refresh tokens enabling persistent access. Researchers also identified the use of remote management tools for maintaining access, AI-assisted development of phishing tooling, and links to broader Phishing-as-a-Service (PhaaS) ecosystems, highlighting how commodity frameworks and automation are lowering the barrier for sophisticated identity-based attacks.

What’s Notable and Unique

  • The campaigns demonstrate the continued shift from traditional credential theft to identity- and token-based compromise, in which attackers target authentication sessions, cookies, and OAuth tokens rather than relying solely on password theft. By obtaining valid authentication artifacts, attackers can access Microsoft 365 environments while bypassing conventional MFA protections.


  • The use of Evilginx-based AiTM frameworks highlights how publicly available phishing tools have evolved into effective MFA-bypass platforms. These frameworks proxy legitimate login pages, capture authenticated sessions, and allow attackers to reuse valid sessions without requiring victims’ credentials again.


  • The OAuth Device Code flow abuse represents a different attack method, in which attackers leverage a legitimate Microsoft authentication mechanism to obtain tokens after victims approve the request. This approach bypasses password theft entirely by abusing trusted authentication workflows.


  • The exposed infrastructure provided insight into attacker operations, including phishing configurations, victim tracking data, remote administration tools, and evidence of AI-assisted development. The findings demonstrate how phishing ecosystems now provide reusable tooling and automation that reduce the technical expertise required to conduct large-scale identity attacks.

Analyst Comments

These Microsoft 365 phishing campaigns demonstrate the ongoing evolution of identity-focused attacks, as adversaries increasingly target authentication sessions, tokens, and legitimate cloud authorization mechanisms to bypass traditional security controls. The combination of AiTM phishing, OAuth abuse, remote management tools, and PhaaS infrastructure enables threat actors to maintain persistent access while blending into legitimate cloud activity.

The growing availability of phishing frameworks and AI-assisted attack development highlights the need for continuous identity security improvements beyond traditional phishing defenses. Arete recommends that organizations strengthen identity monitoring, adopt phishing-resistant MFA where possible, review OAuth application permissions, monitor token activity, and implement conditional access policies to detect and restrict suspicious Microsoft 365 authentication behavior. Security teams should also monitor post-compromise indicators such as abnormal mailbox access, suspicious application consent, unauthorized remote tools, and unusual sign-in activity.

Sources

  • One Misconfigured Server, Three Active Campaigns: Full exposure of three AiTM Phishing Operators

  • Misconfigured Server Reveals Three Evilginx Phishing Operations Targeting Microsoft 365

Podcast

Digital Forensics Meets the Courtroom: Insights on Expert Witness and Cyber-Related Litigation

In this episode of Bytes of Insight, host Vinny Sakore and special guest Dr. Bruce Hartley, Managing Director and Co-Founder of Advisory Services at Arete, discuss the evolving role of digital forensics and expert witness work in cybersecurity litigation. Tune in for firsthand insights on how Arete conducts post-breach investigations, what it takes to undergo cross-examination on the stand, and how emerging threats like AI-driven social engineering and third-party breaches are reshaping the advisory landscape.