Article
Fundamentals of Ransomware: What to Do Before and After Ransomware Strikes
Arete Analysis

By Raj Sivaraju
Amid the pandemic and as more people began working from home via unsecure networks, India saw a 31 percent rise in ransomware attacks.[i] What’s more, according to the Sophos “State of Ransomware 2020” study, of 300 Indian companies surveyed, 82 percent said they’d been hit by ransomware, with average ransom payments of approximately ₹80M.[ii]
Those numbers don’t bode well, especially as success is known to breed success. And don’t ransomware operators know it. There’s no reason for them to quit while they’re ahead — unless you give them one.
For now, the best way to combat this upward trend is to understand what you need to do before and after a ransomware attacks happens.
How to prepare: Get ready for ransomware before it strikes
Before a ransom note arrives and you see your business suddenly grind to a halt, there are actions you can take to limit your risk.
Get cyber insurance. Make sure you have cyber insurance. Ransomware attacks can get expensive fast — and for many, cyber insurance can be a business saver. Not only is there the extortion element to consider, but also the indirect costs of business disruption, reputational damage, data loss, data recovery, and potentially, diminished customer trust. Most regular insurance policies will not cover cyber risk exposure. So, speak to the experts and find out what your policy needs to keep you as safe and covered as possible.
Assess cybersecurity. If you aren’t already, start conducting annual audits and assessments of your environment so that you are aware of your company’s cybersecurity maturity and resilience levels, including potential security gaps.
Harden security posture. Consider deploying endpoint protection to all endpoints across your organization that could be potential gateways for malware attacks — there are some powerful endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools available on the market. Additionally, consider the latest technologies with behavioral artificial intelligence (AI) and fileless identification as well as containment tools.
Write an incident response plan and enlist assistance. Make sure to engage with a specialized third-party incident response vendor who not only will be on standby if an attack occurs but can also provide incident response preparedness training and design and guide you through tabletop exercises. Much like you would run fire drills in physical office spaces, it’s important to conduct simulation activities for incident response.
Dos and don’ts when ransomware hits
Now, let’s say you’ve been hit by ransomware. Here’s a checklist of what you should do — and of equal importance, what you should not do.
The dos:
Call your insurance carrier and third-party incident response vendor.
Remove infected systems from the network, take them offline.
Follow the instructions in the ransom note related to powering off systems.
Preserve all data from systems, firewalls, VPNs, proxy logs for forensic analysis.
Deploy advanced endpoint protection to all systems.
Dependent on organizational size, plan for a full return to normal operations to take up to two weeks.
The don’ts:
Do not panic. If you’ve done the pre-work and already set up your response teams, you can rest assured that they will react fast to triage, mitigate, negotiate, restore, all the things they’ve been trained to handle.
Do not shut down, power cycle, or reboot any infected systems.
Do not contact the threat actor yourself or try to negotiate. Leave this to your incident response vendor.
Do not wipe or re-image any systems as the forensic experts will need these for their investigation.
Do not rely on antivirus solutions, which failed to stop the ransomware.
Do not assume that once a decryptor is purchased that it’s all downhill from there.
Overview of Arete incident response
Arete has worked thousands of ransomware cases. When engaged, our incident response team focuses on getting your business back up and running as quickly as possible.
Step one is a scoping call to collect as many details as possible about the incident and begin collaborating with your insurance carrier to establish next steps for the investigation. Often, our incident response team will also be quick to deploy SentinelOne, an industry-leading EDR solution to clean and protect your environment — and help ensure that the threat actors do not re-encrypt systems after restoration.
If at any point you and your insurance carrier determine that paying a ransom is the most effective way to resolve the issue and return to normal business operations, our team will communicate with the bad actor on your behalf to negotiate a settlement.
With access regained, the team will assist in attack analysis and critical system restoration, bringing varied skill sets to deliver:
Data-driven security architecture review and recommendations.
Decryption and data recovery assistance.
IT infrastructure restoration and rebuilds.
Collection and preservation of forensic evidence.
Security improvements to limit or eliminate unauthorized access to networks, endpoints, and data.
Combined, these services can help you regain and maintain control of systems and assets, improve your cybersecurity going forward, and gather insights to prevent future incidents.
India’s unique opportunity: The time to get ahead of ransomware attacks is now
It’s time to be proactive. India is undergoing a digital transformation, which presents an opportunity to get ahead of this trend by educating employees, assessing security gaps, putting the right protections in place from the start, and having a clear and well-rehearsed incident response plan in place.
[i] Ransomware attacks rose by 31% amid pandemic: Report- The New Indian Express
Back to Blog Posts
Article
FortiBleed Campaign Linked to INC and Lynx Ransomware Operations
Researchers have linked the FortiBleed credential-harvesting campaign to the INC and Lynx ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) operations, establishing a direct connection between large-scale FortiGate credential theft and subsequent ransomware deployment. The attribution is based on a variety of factors, including an operator observed managing negotiation panels for both ransomware groups, notable overlap between FortiBleed victim data and subsequent ransomware targets, and internal infrastructure exposing attack workflows. The campaign is estimated to have targeted more than 430,000 internet-facing FortiGate devices, resulting in administrative access to hundreds of organizations.
What’s Notable and Unique
Researchers identified a shared operator actively managing negotiation panels for both the INC and Lynx ransomware groups, providing rare operational evidence linking the two RaaS operations beyond infrastructure or malware similarities.
Analysis of the exposed infrastructure revealed a structured ransomware operation with dedicated roles for access acquisition, victim management, negotiations, and technical support, reflecting an organized ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) model rather than an ad hoc criminal group.
The operation reportedly integrates artificial intelligence into multiple stages of the attack lifecycle, including vulnerability research, penetration testing, attack automation, and ransomware development, demonstrating the increasing adoption of AI to enhance offensive capabilities.
Mitigations
Organizations should assume that exposed or previously compromised FortiGate credentials may be leveraged for ransomware deployment and immediately reset administrative and VPN credentials while enforcing multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all privileged access. Security teams should ensure that FortiGate appliances are fully patched, restrict management interfaces to trusted networks, and audit administrative accounts and firewall configurations for unauthorized changes. Organizations should also monitor for anomalous authentication activity, hunt for published indicators of compromise (IOCs), and review VPN and firewall logs for signs of unauthorized access. Maintaining centralized logging and a well-practiced incident response process can help detect and contain attacks before they progress to lateral movement or ransomware deployment.
Analyst Comments
The attribution of FortiBleed to the INC and Lynx ransomware operations reinforces the growing convergence between credential-harvesting campaigns and ransomware deployment, highlighting the role of initial access operations in modern RaaS ecosystems. The relationship between INC and Lynx also aligns with Arete's previous research, which identified a shared malware lineage. INC Ransom, first observed in 2023, was later leaked or sold, enabling code reuse by other threat actors. Lynx, which emerged in 2024, is widely regarded as an evolution of the INC codebase. Sinobi ransomware, identified in 2025, shares near-identical binaries and infrastructure, and approximately 99% code similarity with Lynx. Further details on the code correlation between INC, Lynx, and Sinobi are available in Arete's 2025 Annual Report.
Sources
Is FortiBleed Linked to INC and Lynx Ransomware?
FortiBleed credential-theft campaign linked to Lynx ransomware
FortiBleed Unmasked: A Joint Operation by Lynx and INC Ransomware Groups
FortiBleed Credential Theft Campaign Attributed to INC and Lynx Ransomware Groups
Article
Ransomware Trends & Data Insights: June 2026
Although Akira was once again the most active ransomware threat in June, activity remained relatively distributed among multiple threat groups, with 17 unique threat groups observed throughout the month. Along with Akira, Qilin and INC Ransom remained active and were among the top five most active threat groups observed in June. Several new threat actors also emerged during the month, including KryBit, Settra, and Icarus.

Figure 1. Activity from the top 5 threat groups in June 2026
Throughout the month, analysts at Arete identified several trends behind the threat actors perpetrating cybercrime activities:
In June, a threat actor calling themselves Icarus compromised and exfiltrated data from customers of the market intelligence platform Klue. Klue later confirmed the security incident, which involved attackers stealing OAuth tokens used to connect to customers' Salesforce environments, and reported that the threat actor was deleting the data stolen from affected Klue customers. In an odd twist, reports emerged of a second threat actor claiming to have compromised Icarus's infrastructure and attempting to re-extort Klue's customers. Regardless, the Klue breach highlights the growing threat of software-as-a-service (SaaS) supply chain compromises, particularly those exploiting OAuth tokens and trusted integrations to bypass traditional security controls.
In mid-June, security researchers identified a large-scale credential-harvesting and valid account abuse campaign dubbed “FortiBleed” that systematically targets internet-facing Fortinet FortiGate firewalls and SSL-VPN gateways, relying heavily on automated password spraying and configuration exfiltration rather than vulnerability exploitation. The scale of exposure and attack activity has been significant and globally distributed, with attackers collecting the login credentials of over 86,000 FortiGate devices across 194 countries. There is no singular ‘fix’ to mitigate the database exposure, and it is important that organizations work with their security teams, incident response providers, and other stakeholders to review environments holistically and monitor for signs of potentially unauthorized activity.
Multiple threat groups continue to leverage vulnerable drivers to bypass endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions in a technique known as Bring Your Own Vulnerable Driver (BYOVD). Arete has observed Akira and DragonForce using the technique in multiple engagements, and The Gentlemen ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) has also been observed using what researchers are calling "GentleKiller", a framework consisting of multiple variants that leverage vulnerable drivers and EDR-disabling utilities to target a wide range of endpoint security products.
Sources
Arete Internal
Article
Update on FortiBleed Credential Exposure
Last week, security researchers identified a large-scale credential-harvesting and valid account abuse campaign dubbed “FortiBleed” that systematically targets internet-facing Fortinet FortiGate firewalls and SSL-VPN gateways. The campaign relies heavily on automated password spraying and configuration exfiltration rather than vulnerability exploitation.
Attackers first scan for exposed FortiGate devices and rank targets based on revenue. SSH brute-force attacks are used against admin accounts to gain initial access.
Following initial access, operators deploy stealthy packet-sniffing capabilities and establish external listening posts to receive harvested credentials and session data in near real time.
Observed post-exploitation activity strongly indicates pre-positioning for broader enterprise compromise, including lateral movement and potential ransomware deployment.
The scale of exposure and attack activity has been significant and globally distributed. The campaign has been ongoing since at least February 2026, with attackers collecting the login credentials of over 86,000 FortiGate devices across 194 nations.
How Arete Can Help
Arete continues to monitor this campaign, utilizing our extensive experience in detection, threat hunting, and attack surface review to look for indications of unauthorized activity related to this database exposure. Additional information regarding important considerations, containment and credential compromise mitigation actions, and additional hardening recommendations can be found in Arete’s FortiBleed Advisory.
Sources
FortiBleed: SOCRadar’s Investigation into 86,644 Compromised Fortinet Firewalls
FortiBleed Attackers Turn Firewalls Into Credential Stealers as Heists Persist
FortiBleed: The Most Detailed Breakdown Yet of an Active Russian Credential-Harvesting Operation
Hackers Using FortigateSniffer Tool That Turns Compromised Firewalls Into Password Collectors
Article
Europol Disrupts AudiA6 Crypto Laundering Service
European authorities have dismantled AudiA6, a major cryptocurrency laundering service linked to ransomware groups and broader cybercriminal networks. Between 2022 and 2025, the platform is believed to have processed over €336 million in illicit funds, enabling threat actors to obscure financial trails and monetize cybercrime proceeds. Its operators are also suspected of running Dark2Web, a dark web forum that facilitated collaboration, services, and connections among cybercriminals globally. This development underscores the expanding role of sophisticated, large-scale cryptocurrency laundering services in sustaining the cybercrime economy, enabling threat actors to obscure illicit funds and evade regulatory controls.
What’s Notable and Unique
Following law enforcement disruption of Cryptex and Garantex, AudiA6 emerged as another platform involved in financial activities linked to ransomware groups. Investigators believe that AudiA6 became a central hub for cybercriminals seeking to launder stolen digital assets while obscuring the transaction trail from authorities.
On June 10, 2026, a coordinated operation resulted in two arrests in Georgia, the dismantling of key infrastructure (30+ servers, 25 domains), the freezing or seizure of over €778,000 in crypto, and the takedown of the AudiA6 and Dark2Web platforms.
Analyst Comments
Ransomware groups and cybercriminal networks are increasingly leveraging sophisticated techniques, including chain-hopping, decentralized exchanges, and mixer-as-a-service platforms, to rapidly move illicit cryptocurrency across multiple blockchains, effectively obscuring transaction trails. Concurrently, the widespread use of fraudulent exchange accounts, mule wallets, and privacy-enhancing tools has elevated cryptocurrency laundering to a core enabler of the cybercrime ecosystem, allowing actors to bypass anti-money-laundering controls at scale. This investigation identified over 6,000 KYC records linked to money-mule accounts, many of which were tied to Russian-speaking intermediaries specifically recruited to facilitate the movement of illicit proceeds. These threat actors systematically used both commercial and domain-controlled email services to establish mule accounts across multiple cryptocurrency platforms. Collectively, these findings underscore the growing scale, coordination, and professionalization of cryptocurrency-enabled crime, highlighting the critical need for sustained, intelligence-led, and internationally coordinated efforts to disrupt these evolving financial ecosystems.
Sources
Ransomware gangs cut off from EUR 336 million ‘AudiA6’ crypto laundering pipeline



