Article
Max-Severity React2Shell Vulnerability
Arete Analysis
Cybersecurity Trends
Combating Ransomware

A maximum-severity flaw in the widely used JavaScript library React, as well as several React-based frameworks, including Next.js, allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute malicious code on vulnerable instances. The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2025-55182, also known as React2Shell, has been assigned a maximum CVSS severity rating of 10.0, with an estimated 39% of cloud environments affected.
Within hours of disclosure, multiple threat actors, including state-sponsored groups, were observed exploiting the flaw, with researchers confirming that over 30 organizations across multiple sectors have already been compromised.
What’s Notable and Unique
This vulnerability originates from insecure deserialization, where attacker-controlled inputs are processed without adequate validation. Since the flaw is unauthenticated, exploitation becomes significantly easier for threat actors. During deserialization, object properties are implicitly expanded, enabling prototype pollution that can alter application behavior and, when aligned with specific React Server Components execution paths, escalate to remote code execution (RCE).
Active exploitation of the React2Shell (CVE-2025-55182) vulnerability has already been observed from China state-nexus groups Earth Lamia and Jackpot Panda, as well as suspected North Korean actors who are attacking unpatched React Server Components using automated scans and PoC exploits.
Subsequent activity includes EtherRAT and EtherHiding-based payload delivery linked to Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) actor UNC5342, BPFDoor attributed to Red Menshen, the newly identified Auto-color PAM backdoor, and Cobalt Strike, demonstrating the broad use of React2Shell as an initial access vector.
The issue affects versions 19.0.0, 19.1.0, 19.1.1, and 19.2.0 of the react-server-dom-parcel, react-server-dom-webpack, and react-server-dom-turbopack packages, which are embedded in frameworks such as Next.js (≥14.3.0-canary.77, ≥15, ≥16) and other tools including Vite, Parcel, React Router, RedwoodSDK, and Waku.
Analyst Comments
Organizations should prioritize immediate patching to address the React2Shell (CVE-2025-55182) vulnerability and ensure all internet-facing applications are updated to the vendor-recommended versions. In the interim, it is advisable to restrict access to Server Function/Flight endpoints and monitor for any unusual Node.js activity or anomalous React Server Components request patterns due to confirmed exploitation attempts.
At Arete, we are actively monitoring all endpoints for suspicious activity related to this vulnerability and will take prompt action to contain and mitigate any threats. Our security monitoring and response capabilities are fully maintained to ensure timely detection and protection against emerging risks.
Sources
China-nexus cyber threat groups rapidly exploit React2Shell vulnerability (CVE-2025-55182)
‘Exploitation is imminent’ as 39 percent of cloud environs have max-severity React hole
Responding to CVE-2025-55182: Secure your React and Next.js workloads
Protect against React RSC CVE-2025-55182 with Azure Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Back to Blog Posts
Article
Ransomware Trends & Data Insights: July 2026
INC Ransom was the most active threat group in July, while activity remained relatively distributed among multiple threat groups, with 19 unique groups observed throughout the month. Alongside INC Ransom, Qilin, Global Secret Group, Anubis, and DragonForce rounded out the five most active threat groups observed in July. Several emerging threat actors were also observed during the month, including Booba Team, Settra, and Global Secret Group.

Figure 1. Activity from the top 3 threat groups in July 2026
Throughout the month, analysts at Arete identified several trends behind the threat actors perpetrating cybercrime activities:
In July 2026, Global Secret Group emerged as a new threat actor, leveraging the leaked LockBit 3.0 (LockBit Black) source code. Although the group began operations in June 2026, it quickly accumulated a substantial number of victims on its data leak site (DLS). The group operates through TOR-based negotiation portals and qTox communications. Notably, its DLS provides step-by-step guidance on purchasing Bitcoin, including references to Coinbase and Binance, demonstrating a streamlined, victim-focused extortion process designed to simplify ransom payments.
Similar to Fulcrumsec, the recently emerged Settra ransomware group appears to leverage AI-driven analysis of stolen data, publishing detailed and highly structured victim reports on its DLS. Additionally, a potential EDR-disabling tool, edr_blind.exe, was identified in multiple cases, suggesting a focus on defense-evasion capabilities.
With the continuation of the FortiBleed campaign, researchers have now identified compromised FortiGate credentials being leveraged by both the INC and Lynx ransomware operations. Analysis revealed direct operational links between the groups, including shared ransomware infrastructure and overlap between FortiBleed victims and ransomware targets. The operators are also incorporating AI to enhance various stages of the attack lifecycle and increase operational efficiency and scale. Notably, Arete also observed an INC ransomware intrusion leveraging FortiBleed-derived access in July, reinforcing the campaign's role as a precursor to ransomware deployment.
Sources
Arete Internal
Podcast
Cyber Campfire: June Threat Trends & Insights
In this episode of Arete’s Cyber Campfire podcast, our Threat Intelligence Team discusses trends, statistics, and emerging threat actors from June 2026. Tune in for firsthand insights on today’s threat landscape that can enhance your approach to cyber risk.
Article
Current: Misconfigured Server Reveals Multiple Phishing Campaigns
Researchers uncovered three Microsoft 365 phishing campaigns after discovering a misconfigured HTTP server that exposed a threat actor’s phishing tools, configurations, victim logs, and operational infrastructure. The investigation revealed two operators using custom Evilginx-based adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing frameworks to steal authentication sessions and bypass MFA protections. A third operator abused Microsoft’s OAuth Device Code flow by tricking victims into completing authentication through Microsoft’s legitimate login process, allowing attackers to obtain valid access and refresh tokens without stealing passwords. The largest campaign compromised at least 218 victims across 12 countries, primarily targeting corporate Microsoft 365 accounts, with refresh tokens enabling persistent access. Researchers also identified the use of remote management tools for maintaining access, AI-assisted development of phishing tooling, and links to broader Phishing-as-a-Service (PhaaS) ecosystems, highlighting how commodity frameworks and automation are lowering the barrier for sophisticated identity-based attacks.
What’s Notable and Unique
The campaigns demonstrate the continued shift from traditional credential theft to identity- and token-based compromise, in which attackers target authentication sessions, cookies, and OAuth tokens rather than relying solely on password theft. By obtaining valid authentication artifacts, attackers can access Microsoft 365 environments while bypassing conventional MFA protections.
The use of Evilginx-based AiTM frameworks highlights how publicly available phishing tools have evolved into effective MFA-bypass platforms. These frameworks proxy legitimate login pages, capture authenticated sessions, and allow attackers to reuse valid sessions without requiring victims’ credentials again.
The OAuth Device Code flow abuse represents a different attack method, in which attackers leverage a legitimate Microsoft authentication mechanism to obtain tokens after victims approve the request. This approach bypasses password theft entirely by abusing trusted authentication workflows.
The exposed infrastructure provided insight into attacker operations, including phishing configurations, victim tracking data, remote administration tools, and evidence of AI-assisted development. The findings demonstrate how phishing ecosystems now provide reusable tooling and automation that reduce the technical expertise required to conduct large-scale identity attacks.
Analyst Comments
These Microsoft 365 phishing campaigns demonstrate the ongoing evolution of identity-focused attacks, as adversaries increasingly target authentication sessions, tokens, and legitimate cloud authorization mechanisms to bypass traditional security controls. The combination of AiTM phishing, OAuth abuse, remote management tools, and PhaaS infrastructure enables threat actors to maintain persistent access while blending into legitimate cloud activity.
The growing availability of phishing frameworks and AI-assisted attack development highlights the need for continuous identity security improvements beyond traditional phishing defenses. Arete recommends that organizations strengthen identity monitoring, adopt phishing-resistant MFA where possible, review OAuth application permissions, monitor token activity, and implement conditional access policies to detect and restrict suspicious Microsoft 365 authentication behavior. Security teams should also monitor post-compromise indicators such as abnormal mailbox access, suspicious application consent, unauthorized remote tools, and unusual sign-in activity.
Sources
One Misconfigured Server, Three Active Campaigns: Full exposure of three AiTM Phishing Operators
Misconfigured Server Reveals Three Evilginx Phishing Operations Targeting Microsoft 365
Podcast
Digital Forensics Meets the Courtroom: Insights on Expert Witness and Cyber-Related Litigation
In this episode of Bytes of Insight, host Vinny Sakore and special guest Dr. Bruce Hartley, Managing Director and Co-Founder of Advisory Services at Arete, discuss the evolving role of digital forensics and expert witness work in cybersecurity litigation. Tune in for firsthand insights on how Arete conducts post-breach investigations, what it takes to undergo cross-examination on the stand, and how emerging threats like AI-driven social engineering and third-party breaches are reshaping the advisory landscape.



