Article
The Road Back: Recovery from a Malware Attack in the Long Term
Arete Analysis
Cybersecurity 101
Arete Incident Response is currently answering the call of duty for about 60 companies per month who have experienced malware intrusions. These are mostly ransomware or business email compromise attacks. Arete’s primary goal is to restore what was broken and get the client back into business. However, another important goal is to harden the client’s IT environment against future attacks.
The steps taken by Arete commonly involve the following:
Implementing a more secure login process, such as two factor authentication—especially for remote access
Installing endpoint protection agents, which some call “Next Gen AV”, but are far more than just antivirus software
Minimizing the attack service by disabling unneeded services and protocols; and
Changing passwords, particularly on administrative accounts.
During the initial stages of the response process, the Arete team is completely focused on remediating the malware and getting the client’s critical systems back online. But what does this experience mean for the future of the company? Usually, the business owner has some regret about not having taken sufficient security precautions before the incident, and the question always arises: “How do we keep this from happening again?”
One critical piece has already been implemented – endpoint protection. Comprehensive coverage of the network boundaries increases the chances that intrusions will be detected. However, cyber-extortion/ransomware and the malware that enables it can evolve rapidly and
require a continuously trained staff to thwart. Acquiring, retaining, and training adequate staff is beyond the capability of many businesses. A cybersecurity firm offering vCISO (virtual chief security officer) services can provide the needed expertise to ensure that the business develops a formal information security program that addresses current risk, as well as prepares for the next wave of attacks.
Preventing the recurrence of a breach involves more than technology and requires a more comprehensive approach to security. Information security is not just a technical problem–it is a business problem. It should be approached in the same methodical fashion by which other business problems are managed. Just as the company has a “quality culture” for products, it must be understood that security is just another aspect of product and service quality. Quality is achieved through deliberate and continuous actions. The development of policies, standards of behavior, and contingency protocols for security should run parallel to the critical business processes that generate revenue. A successful security program requires some investment, but in the long run pays off in safeguarding the business’ data, intellectual property, consumer information, business processes and most importantly, its reputation.
A comprehensive treatment of a full security program is beyond the scope of this article. Nevertheless, significant components include:
IT policy that clearly establishes expectations that management has regarding the protection and handling of company/customer data, company technology and resources.
IT infrastructure review for assessing the current state of company technology and means of access to that technology, with a roadmap of continuous security improvement.
Data security and privacy reviews that map the movement and protection of sensitive data as that data traverses the critical business activities and processes.
Special attention should be paid to understanding what is most important to continue generating revenue, with contingency planning for disaster recovery and business resilience for each critical process. The people, processes and technology that actually make the business what it is should be well understood, documented, and have redundant resources for ensuring continuous operations, even during a cyber-attack.
Spending on improving the security posture of a business can be a hard pill to swallow, particularly after expenses from a breach come in, but there will never be a better moment to tackle it. Security events can be a focal point for employee awareness, and the need to heighten that awareness will never make more sense than in the days following the event. Building a culture of security and framing the effort required as just another part of the business day is a relatively low-cost way to improve. Other investments in maturing processes and technology will probably be required to ensure a secure future for the business. The best way to spend on security could be to acquire the services of those who have built programs before, at least until there is a functioning security program that can stand on its own two feet.
Back to Blog Posts
Article
Arete's 2026 Q1 Crimeware Report
Harness Arete’s unique data and expertise on extortion and ransomware to inform your response to the evolving threat landscape.
Article
CMS Vulnerability Leads to ClickFix Campaign
Threat actors compromised at least 700 education and technology websites in a recent ClickFix campaign by exploiting a critical SQL injection flaw (CVE-2026-26980) in the Ghost content management system (CMS). Adversaries combined the vulnerability with the ClickFix social engineering tactic to steal admin keys and inject a malicious JavaScript that delivers a fake Cloudflare or CAPTCHA verification pop-up, tricking victims into copying and pasting a malicious command into their systems.
What’s Notable and Unique
Rather than targeting the end user first, this campaign is unique in its initial exploitation of the system, followed by social engineering attempts. This hybrid attack style is likely being leveraged to bypass traditional defenses.
This recent campaign also highlights how trusted web properties can be weaponized at scale and coupled with unpatched CMS vulnerabilities. Rather than using the CMS compromise to perpetrate a single attack, threat actors turned it into a supply-chain attack that ultimately affected over 700 trusted websites.
Analyst Comments
As network defenders and their tools enhance threat detection capabilities, adversaries increasingly seek methods to bypass these defenses. By combining vulnerability exploitation, social engineering techniques, and staging for ancillary attacks, this campaign successfully bypassed traditional defenses and inflicted significant impact. Defending against hybrid cyberattacks requires comprehensive security controls beyond simply patching vulnerabilities. Organizations should focus on limiting movement within the environment, detecting abuse of trusted applications, and preventing end-user manipulation.
Sources
700+ education and tech websites hijacked in huge ClickFix malware campaign
Under the engineering hood: Why Malwarebytes chose WordPress as its CMS
Think before you Click(Fix): Analyzing the ClickFix social engineering technique
Ghost CMS Vulnerability Exploited to Infect 700 Sites With ClickFix Malware
Article
Threat Actors Leverage Fake JPEG Files for Initial Access
In a recent campaign, researchers observed threat actors using fake JPEG image files as a delivery mechanism to initiate the deployment of additional malicious components. The false JPEG files are typically distributed via phishing emails or other social engineering-based lures, and are actually PowerShell-based malware that deploys a trojanized version of ConnectWise ScreenConnect to establish and maintain persistence in the compromised environment.
What’s Notable and Unique
This campaign leverages JPEG images as the initial lure, where the images are not merely decoys but part of the infection workflow. Victims are typically led to download or open an image that triggers hidden execution logic or redirects them to a payload-delivery sequence that initiates later stages of the intrusion chain.
The attack chain is designed to blend into legitimate environments, making detection more difficult. Execution typically relies on scripted or native Windows components, often including PowerShell or other living-off-the-land binaries, enabling fileless or near-fileless execution and reducing forensic artifacts on disk.
The multistage design ensures that the initial JPEG does not directly contain the full payload but instead triggers retrieval or decryption steps that progressively assemble the final malicious components in memory.
Analyst Comments
This campaign illustrates how threat actors continue to blur the line between legitimate file handling and malicious execution chains, indicating potential overlap with remote management or administrative tooling. The use of JPEG-based staging combined with script-based execution reflects a broader evolution toward a stealth-first intrusion design, in which file formats serve as triggers rather than payload containers.
Sources
OPERATION SILENTCANVAS : JPEG BASED MULTISTAGE POWERSHELL INTRUSION
Podcast
Cyber Risk and Insurance for Law Firms
In this episode of Bytes of Insight, host Vinny Sakore is joined by Laura Zaroski, Managing Director of the Law Firms Group at Gallagher, as they discuss the evolution of cyber risk for law firms. Tune in for firsthand insights on how to select the right cyber policy, the incident response process, and the nuances of ransom payments and sensitive data.