Article
New Group Emerges with Similarities to ALPHV/BlackCat
Threat Actors
Arete Analysis

A new Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) group calling themselves Cicada3301 emerged in early June 2024 and has been using recruitment posts in dark web forums to attract new affiliates. As with many of the current active RaaS organizations, Cicada3301 uses double extortion, encrypting victim systems and stealing sensitive data. They have a data leak site (DLS) on the dark web where they have been posting victims since mid-June. The group has been observed encrypting Linux/VMware ESXi in addition to Windows operating systems.
Similarities with ALPHV/BlackCat
A recent analysis of Cicada3301’s ransomware conducted by cyber researchers discovered several significant code overlaps with the ransomware used by ALPHV, the prolific threat group who was targeted by law enforcement earlier this year and subsequently shut down their RaaS. According to researchers from Truesec, Cicada3301 and ALPHV ransomware similarities include:
Written in Rust programming language
Use the ChaCha20 algorithm for encryption
Use almost identical commands to shutdown VM and remove snapshots
Use the same command parameters to provide a graphic output on encryption
Use intermittent encryptions on files larger than 100MB
Use a similar naming convention for the ransom note file and the same key parameter used to decrypt the ransomware note
In addition to the code overlaps, Arete has also observed similarities in the format and design of the Tor chats Cicada3301 uses to communicate ransom payments to its victims. Like the Tor chats ALPHV used, Cicada3301’s has a similar layout, with certain words bolded in the instructions, a countdown timer, two prices listed based on whether the victim pays within the time limit posted, and payments are accepted in both Bitcoin and Monero.

Figure 1. Screenshot of TOR chat used by Cicada3301 (source: Arete)

Figure 2. Screenshot of TOR chat used by ALPHV (source: bleepingcomputer.com)
Will the Real Cicada Please Stand Up?
This new ransomware group also appears to have taken their name from Cicada 3301, which was an unknown group who posted elaborate puzzles on the internet between 2012 and 2014. Solving the puzzles required knowledge of computer science and data security concepts such as coding, cryptography, and encryption. The last puzzle posted by the group was in early 2014 and has still not been solved. Although the purpose of the puzzles, and individuals who created them remains a mystery, there is no indication that this current ransomware group has any association with the original Cicada 3301. This wouldn’t be the first time a threat actor has used the name, as an unrelated group of hackers operating in 2015 also called themselves 3301.
Analyst Comments
At this time, it is too early to assess whether the similarities between the two groups are coincidental, or if there is a connection in the form of a rebranding of ALPHV, a new group working with former developers from ALPHV, or if ALPHV’s ransomware code was sold after the RaaS shut down its operations earlier this year. Following ALPHV’s exit scam and departure from the ransomware landscape, it was assumed members of the RaaS would rebrand or re-affiliate with other threat groups, so any of these connections are plausible. However, with 24 victims already posted to its DLS in less than three months, Cicada3301 already appears to be an emerging threat in the near-term, regardless of who is ultimately behind the new RaaS.
Sources
Back to Blog Posts
Article
Ransomware Trends & Data Insights: March 2026
The threat landscape in March had a much more even distribution of threat groups than has been observed since the first half of 2025. Although Akira, Qilin, Play, and INC remained among the most active groups, Arete observed 21 unique ransomware and extortion groups in March, compared to only 15 in February. Akira and Qilin’s activity also declined from the previous month; in February, the two groups were responsible for almost half of all ransomware incidents, but in March they only comprised a little more than a quarter of all activity. Arete also observed activity from several emerging groups in the past month, including BravoX, NightSpire, Payouts King, and Securotrop.

Figure 1. Activity from the top 5 threat groups in March 2026
Analysts at Arete identified several trends behind the threat actors perpetrating cybercrime activities:
In March, threat actors actively exploited FortiGate Next-Generation Firewall appliances as initial access vectors to compromise enterprise networks. The activity involves the exploitation of recently disclosed security vulnerabilities, including CVE-2025-59718, CVE-2025-59719, and CVE-2026-24858, or weak credentials, allowing attackers to gain administrative access, extract configuration files, and obtain service account credentials. Arete also observed Fortinet device exploitation involving various threat groups, with the Qilin ransomware group notably leveraging Fortinet device exploits.
Phishing campaigns leveraging OAuth redirection and a resurgence of Microsoft Teams–based social engineering were also observed in March. In one campaign, attackers sent emails disguised as Microsoft Teams recordings or Microsoft 365 alerts, redirecting victims through legitimate OAuth endpoints to attacker-controlled pages hosting malicious ZIP payloads. A separate campaign has been ongoing since last year, in which attackers flood users’ inboxes with spam and impersonate IT support personnel to trick victims into initiating remote support sessions via tools like Quick Assist.
Arete recently released its 2025 Annual Crimeware Report. Leveraging data and intelligence collected during ransomware and extortion incident response engagements, this report highlights notable trends and shifts in the threat landscape throughout 2025, including Akira’s unusually high activity levels in the second half of 2025, evolving social engineering techniques, and trends in ransom demands and impacted industries.
Sources
Arete Internal
Report
Arete's 2025 Annual Crimeware Report
Harness Arete’s unique data and expertise on extortion and ransomware to inform your response to the evolving threat landscape.
Article
FortiGate Exploits Enable Network Breaches and Credential Theft
A recent security report indicates that threat actors are actively exploiting FortiGate Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW) appliances as initial access vectors to compromise enterprise networks. The activity leverages recently disclosed vulnerabilities or weak credentials to gain unauthorized access and extract configuration files, which often contain sensitive information, including service account credentials and detailed network topology data.
Analysis of these incidents shows significant variation in attacker dwell time, ranging from immediate lateral movement to delays of up to two months post-compromise. Since these appliances often integrate with authentication systems such as Active Directory and Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP), their compromise can grant attackers extensive access, substantially increasing the risk of widespread network intrusion and data exposure.
What’s Notable and Unique
The activity involves the exploitation of recently disclosed security vulnerabilities, including CVE-2025-59718, CVE-2025-59719, and CVE-2026-24858, or weak credentials, allowing attackers to gain administrative access, extract configuration files, and obtain service account credentials and network topology information.
In one observed incident, attackers created a FortiGate admin account with unrestricted firewall rules and maintained access over time, consistent with initial access broker activity. After a couple of months, threat actors extracted and decrypted LDAP credentials to compromise Active Directory.
In another case, attackers moved from FortiGate access to deploying remote access tools, including Pulseway and MeshAgent, while also utilizing cloud infrastructure such as Google Cloud Storage and Amazon Web Services (AWS).
Analyst Comments
Arete has identified multiple instances of Fortinet device exploitation for initial access, involving various threat actors, with the Qilin ransomware group notably leveraging Fortinet device exploits. Given their integration with systems like Active Directory, NGFW appliances remain high-value targets for both state-aligned and financially motivated actors. In parallel, Arete has observed recent dark web activity involving leaked FortiGate VPN access, further highlighting the expanding risk landscape. This aligns with the recent reporting from Amazon Threat Intelligence, which identified large-scale compromises of FortiGate devices driven by exposed management ports and weak authentication, rather than vulnerability exploitation. Overall, these developments underscore the increasing focus on network edge devices as entry points, reinforcing the need for organizations to strengthen authentication, restrict external exposure, and address fundamental security gaps to mitigate the risk of widespread compromise.
Sources
FortiGate Edge Intrusions | Stolen Service Accounts Lead to Rogue Workstations and Deep AD Compromise
Article
Vulnerability Discovered in Anthropic’s Claude Code
Security researchers discovered two critical vulnerabilities in Anthropic's agentic AI coding tool, Claude Code. The vulnerabilities, tracked as CVE-2025-59536 and CVE-2026-21852, allowed attackers to achieve remote code execution and to compromise a victim's API credentials. The vulnerabilities exploit maliciously crafted repository configurations to circumvent control mechanisms. It should be noted that Anthropic worked closely with the security researchers throughout the process, and the bugs were patched before the research was published.
What’s Notable and Unique
The configuration files .claude/settings.json and .mcp.json were repurposed to execute malicious commands. Because the configurations could be applied immediately upon starting Claude Code, the commands ran before the user could deny permissions via a dialogue prompt, or they bypassed the authentication prompt altogether.
.claude/settings.json also defines the endpoint for all Claude Code API communications. By replacing the default localhost URL with a URL they own, an attacker could redirect traffic to infrastructure they control. Critically, the authentication traffic generated upon starting Claude Code included the user's full Anthropic API key in plain text and was sent before the user could interact with the trust dialogue.
Restrictive permissions on sensitive files could be bypassed by simply prompting Claude Code to create a copy of the file's contents, which did not inherit the original file's permissions. A threat actor using a stolen API key could gain complete read and write access to all files within a workspace.
Analyst Comments
The vulnerabilities and attack paths detailed in the research illustrate the double-edged nature of AI tools. The speed, scale, and convenience characteristics that make AI tools attractive to developer teams also benefit threat actors who use them for nefarious purposes. Defenders should expect adversaries to continue seeking ways to exploit configurations and orchestration logic to increase the impact of their attacks. Organizations planning to implement AI development tools should prioritize AI supply-chain hygiene and CI/CD hardening practices.
Sources
Caught in the Hook: RCE and API Token Exfiltration Through Claude Code Project Files | CVE-2025-59536 | CVE-2026-21852



